Literature DB >> 22144023

The pH sensitivity of -NH exchange in LnDOTA-tetraamide complexes varies with amide substituent.

Ana Christina L Opina1, Yunkou Wu, Piyu Zhao, Garry Kiefer, A Dean Sherry.   

Abstract

The amide proton exchange rates in various lanthanide(III) DOTA-tetraamide complexes were investigated by CEST as a function of variable chemical structures and charges on the amide substituents. Comparisons were made between YbDOTA-(gly)(4)(-) (Yb-1), YbDOTA-(NHCH(2)PO(3))(4 (5-) (Yb-2) and YbDOTA-(NHCH(2)PO(3)Et(2))(4)(3+) (Yb-3). The general shapes of the CEST vs pH profiles were similar for the three complexes but they showed maximum CEST intensities at different pH values, pH 8.3, 8.8 and 6.9 for Yb-1, Yb-2 and Yb-3, respectively. This indicates that a more negatively charged substituent on the amide helps stabilize the partial positive charge on the amide nitrogen and consequently more base is required to catalyze proton exchange. The chemical shifts of the -NH protons in Yb-1 and Yb-2 were similar (-17 ppm) while the -NH proton in Yb-3 was at -13 ppm. This shows that the crystal field produced by the amide oxygen donor atoms in Yb-3 is substantially weaker than that in the other two complexes. In an effort to expand the useful range of pH values that might be measured using these complexes as CEST agents, the shapes of the CEST vs pH curves were also determined for two thulium(III) complexes with much larger hyperfine shifted -NH proton resonances. The ratio of CEST from -NH exchange in Tm-1 compared with CEST from -NH exchange in Tm-3 was found to be linear over an extended pH range, from 6.3 to 7.4. This demonstrates a potential advantage of using mixtures of lanthanide(III) DOTA-tetraamides for mapping tissue pH by use of ratiometric CEST imaging.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22144023      PMCID: PMC3233223          DOI: 10.1002/cmmi.445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1555-4309            Impact factor:   3.161


  22 in total

1.  Magnetization transfer in MRI: a review.

Authors:  R M Henkelman; G J Stanisz; S J Graham
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  Determination of pH using water protons and chemical exchange dependent saturation transfer (CEST).

Authors:  K M Ward; R S Balaban
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  A novel europium(III)-based MRI contrast agent.

Authors:  S Zhang; P Winter; K Wu; A D Sherry
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2001-02-21       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Novel pH-reporter MRI contrast agents.

Authors:  Silvio Aime; Daniela Delli Castelli; Enzo Terreno
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 5.  PARACEST agents: modulating MRI contrast via water proton exchange.

Authors:  Shanrong Zhang; Matthew Merritt; Donald E Woessner; Robert E Lenkinski; A Dean Sherry
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 22.384

6.  Ln(III)-DOTAMGly complexes: a versatile series to assess the determinants of the efficacy of paramagnetic chemical exchange saturation transfer agents for magnetic resonance imaging applications.

Authors:  Enzo Terreno; Daniela Delli Castelli; Giancarlo Cravotto; Luciano Milone; Silvio Aime
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 7.  Paramagnetic lanthanide complexes as PARACEST agents for medical imaging.

Authors:  Mark Woods; Donald E Woessner; A Dean Sherry
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 54.564

8.  Numerical solution of the Bloch equations provides insights into the optimum design of PARACEST agents for MRI.

Authors:  Donald E Woessner; Shanrong Zhang; Matthew E Merritt; A Dean Sherry
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Acid-mediated tumor invasion: a multidisciplinary study.

Authors:  Robert A Gatenby; Edward T Gawlinski; Arthur F Gmitro; Brant Kaylor; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Paramagnetic lanthanide(III) complexes as pH-sensitive chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) contrast agents for MRI applications.

Authors:  Silvio Aime; Alessandro Barge; Daniela Delli Castelli; Franco Fedeli; Armando Mortillaro; Flemming U Nielsen; Enzo Terreno
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of divalent transition metal ion paraCEST MRI contrast agents.

Authors:  Sarina J Dorazio; Abiola O Olatunde; Pavel B Tsitovich; Janet R Morrow
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.358

2.  Lanthanide ion (III) complexes of 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraaminophosphonate for dual biosensing of pH with chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) and biosensor imaging of redundant deviation in shifts (BIRDS).

Authors:  Yuegao Huang; Daniel Coman; Meser M Ali; Fahmeed Hyder
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Modulating water-exchange rates of lanthanide(III)-containing polyaminopolycarboxylate-type complexes using polyethylene glycol.

Authors:  Buddhima N Siriwardena-Mahanama; Matthew J Allen
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 4.390

4.  Characterizing the magnetic susceptibility tensor of lanthanide-containing polymethylated-DOTA complexes.

Authors:  Madeleine Strickland; Charles D Schwieters; Christoph Göbl; Ana C L Opina; Marie-Paule Strub; Rolf E Swenson; Olga Vasalatiy; Nico Tjandra
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 5.  Strategies for optimizing water-exchange rates of lanthanide-based contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Buddhima N Siriwardena-Mahanama; Matthew J Allen
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 4.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.