| Literature DB >> 22143572 |
Kedan Chu1, Wei Xu, Huang Li, Lidian Chen, Yuqin Zhang, Xuchong Tang.
Abstract
The supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) of Lepidium apetalum seed oil and its anti-oxidant activity were studied. The SFE process was optimized using response surface methodology (RSM) with a central composite design (CCD). Independent variables, namely operating pressure, temperature, time and flow rate were evaluated. The maximum extraction of Lepidium apetalum seed oil by SFE-CO₂ (about 36.3%) was obtained when SFE-CO₂ extraction was carried out under the optimal conditions of 30.0 MPa of pressure, 70 °C of temperature, 120 min of extraction time and 25.95 L/h of flow rate. GC-MS analysis showed the presence of four fatty acids in Lepidium apetalum seed oil, with a high content (91.0%) of unsaturated fatty acid. The anti-oxidant activity of the oil was assessed by the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical-scavenging assay and 2,2'-azino- bis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) diammonium salt (ABTS) test. Lepidium apetalum seed oil possessed a notable concentration-dependent antioxidant activity, with IC₅₀ values of 1.00 and 3.75 mg/mL, respectively.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22143572 PMCID: PMC6264353 DOI: 10.3390/molecules161210029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Experimental program and results for SFE-CO2 of Lepidium apetalum seed oil.
| No. | A | B | C | D | Pressure | Temperature | Time | Flow | Extraction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pressure | Temperature | Time | Flow rate | MPa | °C | min | rate L/h | yield (%) | |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 60 | 90 | 25 | 29.92 |
| 2 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 30 | 50 | 120 | 30 | 32.58 |
| 3 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 30 | 50 | 120 | 20 | 31.17 |
| 4 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 30 | 50 | 60 | 30 | 29.47 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −2 | 25 | 60 | 90 | 15 | 28.09 |
| 6 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 30 | 70 | 60 | 30 | 30.53 |
| 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 30 | 70 | 120 | 20 | 34.42 |
| 8 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 20 | 50 | 60 | 20 | 25.01 |
| 9 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 20 | 50 | 60 | 20 | 15.21 |
| 10 | 0 | −2 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 60 | 60 | 30 | 30.11 |
| 11 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 20 | 50 | 90 | 20 | 28 |
| 12 | 0 | 0 | −2 | 0 | 25 | 60 | 30 | 25 | 25.13 |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 60 | 90 | 25 | 31.97 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 60 | 90 | 25 | 33.06 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 60 | 90 | 25 | 29.52 |
| 16 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 20 | 70 | 120 | 20 | 27.07 |
| 17 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 70 | 120 | 30 | 27.54 |
| 18 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 20 | 50 | 60 | 30 | 28.33 |
| 19 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 60 | 90 | 25 | 30.32 |
| 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 60 | 90 | 25 | 33.05 |
| 21 | −2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 60 | 90 | 25 | 11.79 |
| 22 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 30 | 70 | 120 | 30 | 35.56 |
| 23 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 20 | 70 | 60 | 30 | 17.44 |
| 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 25 | 60 | 90 | 35 | 30.66 |
| 25 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 80 | 90 | 25 | 31.82 |
| 26 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 25 | 60 | 150 | 25 | 30.18 |
| 27 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 30 | 50 | 60 | 20 | 31.06 |
| 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 60 | 90 | 25 | 31.98 |
| 29 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 30 | 70 | 60 | 20 | 30.73 |
| 30 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 50 | 120 | 30 | 28.15 |
Lepidium apetalum seed extraction yield the regression equation coefficient and significant testing.
| Source | Sum of | df | Mean square | F-value | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| squares | ||||||
| Model | 766.95 | 14 | 54.78 | 14.716 | <0.0001 | significant |
| A-Pressure | 382.64 | 1 | 382.64 | 102.71 | <0.0001 | |
| B-Temperature | 5.85 | 1 | 5.85 | 1.57 | 0.2293 | |
| C-Time | 91.3 | 1 | 91.3 | 24.51 | 0.0002 | |
| D-Flow | 6.07 | 1 | 6.03 | 1.63 | 0.2212 | |
| AB | 53.25 | 1 | 53.25 | 14.29 | 0.0018 | |
| AC | 10.29 | 1 | 10.29 | 2.76 | 0.1173 | |
| AD | 1.83 | 1 | 1.83 | 0.49 | 0.4942 | |
| BC | 37.98 | 1 | 37.98 | 10.19 | 0.0061 | |
| BD | 7.656E−003 | 1 | 7.656E−003 | 2.055E−003 | 0.9644 | |
| CD | 0.022 | 1 | 0.022 | 5.840E−0.003 | 0.9401 | |
| A2 | 166.62 | 1 | 166.62 | 44.73 | <0.0001 | |
| B2 | 4.503E−003 | 1 | 4.503E−003 | 1.209E−003 | 0.9727 | |
| C2 | 18.2 | 1 | 18.2 | 4.89 | 0.043 | |
| D2 | 4.06 | 1 | 4.06 | 1.09 | 0.3131 | |
| Residual | 55.88 | 15 | 3.73 | |||
| Lack of Fit | 44.22 | 10 | 4.42 | 1.9 | 0.2489 | not significant |
| Pure Error | 11.66 | 5 | 2.33 | |||
| Cor Total | 822.83 | 29 |
Values of "Prob > F" less than 0.0500 indicate model terms are significant.
Figure 1Response surfaces representations for the yield of oil (a–f) from Lepidium apetalum seed. (a) Effect of pressure (P) and temperature (T) under fixed flow rate (F) 25L/h and extraction time (t) 90 min; (b) Effect of P and t at F = 25 L/h and T = 60 °C; (c) Effect of F and P at T = 60 °C and t = 90 min; (d) Effect of T and t at P = 25 MPa and F = 25 L/h; (e) Effect of F and T at P = 25 MPa and t = 90 min; (f) Effect of F and t at P = 25 MPa and T = 60 °C.
Figure 2Total ion chromatogram (TIC) of the fatty acid methyl ester of Lepidium apetalum seed oil extracted by SFE-CO2 (A) and conventional organic solvent extraction (B).
Figure 3Antiradical activity determined using DPPH and ABTS. (a) The DPPH radical-scavenging of BHT. The concentration was from 3 µg/mL to 60 µg/mL; (b) The DPPH radical-scavenging of Lepidium apetalum seed oil. The concentration was from 0.5 mg/mL to 10 mg/mL. Data are averages with S.D. (error bars) from at least three independent experiments. * P < 0.05, versus control; (c) The ABTS radical-scavenging of BHT. The concentration was from 3 µg/mL to 60 µg/mL; (d) The ABTS radical-scavenging of Lepidium apetalum seed oil. The concentration was from 0.5 mg/mL to 10 mg/mL. Data are averages with S.D. (error bars) from at least three independent experiments. * P < 0.05, versus control.
Level and factors chosen for the trial.
| Variable | Code | Levels | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −2 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | ||
| Pressure (MPa) X1 | A | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 | 35 |
| Temperature (°C) X2 | B | 40 | 50 | 60 | 70 | 80 |
| Time (min) X3 | C | 30 | 60 | 90 | 120 | 150 |
| Flow (L/h) X4 | D | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 | 35 |