Literature DB >> 22143170

Prognostic value of real time dobutamine stress myocardial contrast echocardiography in patients with chest pain syndrome.

Geu-Ru Hong1, Jong-Seon Park, Sang-Hee Lee, Dong-Gu Shin, Ung Kim, Jung Hyun Choi, Robin Abdelmalik, Jesús A Vera, Jin-Kyung Kim, Jagat Narula, Mani A Vannan.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were (1) to evaluate the prognostic value of negative wall motion (WM) and myocardial perfusion during contrast-dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE), (2) to determine whether WM-myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) had incremental prognostic value over just WM during DSE in patients with chest pain in the emergency room (ER), and (3) to compare the prognostic value of negative DSE-WM, and DSE-WM-MCE to nuclear-myocardial perfusion imaging (N-MPI) in a similar patient population over the same time period. We retrospectively studied 569 patients with real time contrast DSE, and 147 patients underwent N-MPI for evaluation of chest pain. Follow-up for cardiac events was obtained between 12 and 25 months. The cumulative cardiac event-free survival was 94.5% in negative DSE-WM, 97.1% in negative DSE-WM-MCE and 96.7% in negative N-MPI group. Cardiac event-free survival of the negative DSE-WM-MCE group was significantly higher than the DSE-WM group (log rank P < 0.01), and similar in the DSE-WM-MCE group compared to the N-MPI group. Combined WM and perfusion during DSE was the strongest independent predictor for cardiac events. The negative predictive power of DSE-WM-MCE is superior to that of just negative DSE-WM and is comparable to that of N-MPI. Myocardial perfusion and WM analysis during DSE provide independent information for predicting cardiac events in patients with chest pain syndrome in the ER.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22143170      PMCID: PMC4694632          DOI: 10.1007/s10554-011-9976-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  31 in total

Review 1.  Stress echocardiography: a historical perspective.

Authors:  Eugenio Picano
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Stress echocardiography: the scourge of subjective interpretation.

Authors:  R Hoffmann; P Hanrath
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 3.  The present role of nuclear cardiology in clinical practice.

Authors:  A N Clark; G A Beller
Journal:  Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.346

Review 4.  Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms.

Authors:  N B Schiller; P M Shah; M Crawford; A DeMaria; R Devereux; H Feigenbaum; H Gutgesell; N Reichek; D Sahn; I Schnittger
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.251

5.  Prognostic value of pharmacological stress echocardiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: a prospective, large-scale, multicenter, head-to-head comparison between dipyridamole and dobutamine test. Echo-Persantine International Cooperative (EPIC) and Echo-Dobutamine International Cooperative (EDIC) Study Groups.

Authors:  A Pingitore; E Picano; A Varga; G Gigli; L Cortigiani; M Previtali; G Minardi; M Q Colosso; J Lowenstein; W Mathias; P Landi
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography in predicting cardiac events in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  J Krivokapich; J S Child; D O Walter; A Garfinkel
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Dobutamine stress tele-echocardiography for evaluation of emergency department patients with chest pain.

Authors:  J A Trippi; K S Lee; G Kopp; D R Nelson; K G Yee; W H Cordell
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Effect of time delay on the diagnostic use of contrast echocardiography in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain and no S-T segment elevation.

Authors:  Saul Kalvaitis; Sanjiv Kaul; Khim Leng Tong; Diana Rinkevich; Todd Belcik; Kevin Wei
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.251

9.  Comparative accuracy of real-time myocardial contrast perfusion imaging and wall motion analysis during dobutamine stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Abdou Elhendy; Edward L O'Leary; Feng Xie; Anna C McGrain; James R Anderson; Thomas R Porter
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Prognostic value of predischarge dobutamine stress echocardiography in chest pain patients with a negative cardiac troponin T.

Authors:  Radha Bholasingh; Jan Hein Cornel; Otto Kamp; Jan P van Straalen; Gerard T Sanders; Jan G P Tijssen; Victor A W M Umans; Cees A Visser; Robbert J de Winter
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-02-19       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.