Literature DB >> 10080472

Prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography in predicting cardiac events in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

J Krivokapich1, J S Child, D O Walter, A Garfinkel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The study sought to determine the utility of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in predicting cardiac events in the year after testing.
BACKGROUND: Increasingly, DSE has been applied to risk stratification of patients.
METHODS: Medical records of 1,183 consecutive patients who underwent DSE were reviewed. The cardiac events that occurred during the 12 months after DSE were tabulated: myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac death, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), and coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). Patient exclusions included organ transplant receipt or evaluation, recent PTCA, noncardiac death, and lack of follow-up. A positive stress echocardiogram (SE) was defined as new or worsened wall-motion abnormalities (WMAs) consistent with ischemia during DSE. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis identified variables that best predicted future cardiac events.
RESULTS: The average age was 68+/-12 years, with 338 women and 220 men. The overall cardiac event rate was 34% if SE was positive, and 10% if it was negative. The event rates for MI and death were 10% and 8%, respectively, if SE was positive, and 3% and 3%, respectively, if SE was negative. If an ischemic electrocardiogram (ECG) and a positive SE were present, the overall event rate was 42%, versus a 7% rate when ECG and SE were negative for ischemia. Rest WMA was the most useful variable in predicting future cardiac events using CART: 25% of patients with and 6% without a rest WMA had an event. Other important variables were a dobutamine EF <52.5%, a positive SE, an ischemic ECG response, history of hypertension and age.
CONCLUSIONS: A positive SE provides useful prognostic information that is enhanced by also considering rest-wall motion, stress ECG response, and dobutamine EF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10080472     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00632-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  15 in total

1.  Post-myocardial infarction risk stratification with stress nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging versus echocardiography: separate but not equal.

Authors:  K A Brown
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Prognostic value of real time dobutamine stress myocardial contrast echocardiography in patients with chest pain syndrome.

Authors:  Geu-Ru Hong; Jong-Seon Park; Sang-Hee Lee; Dong-Gu Shin; Ung Kim; Jung Hyun Choi; Robin Abdelmalik; Jesús A Vera; Jin-Kyung Kim; Jagat Narula; Mani A Vannan
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Comparison of the cost-effectiveness of stress myocardial SPECT and stress echocardiography in suspected coronary artery disease considering the prognostic value of false-negative results.

Authors:  Dong Soo Lee; Myoung Jin Jang; Gi Jeong Cheon; June-Key Chung; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Prognostic value of stress echocardiogram in patients with angiographically significant coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Siu-Sun Yao; Omar Wever-Pinzon; Xiaoqian Zhang; Sripal Bangalore; Farooq A Chaudhry
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 5.  Stress echocardiography for the detection and assessment of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Nowell M Fine; Patricia A Pellikka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Interpreting the change in left ventricular ejection fraction during pharmacological coronary vasodilation: Proceed with caution!

Authors:  Steven Port
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Prognostic value of stress echocardiography in women with high (> or = 80%) probability of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  J I Davar; E B Roberts; J G Coghlan; T R Evans; D P Lipkin
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.401

8.  Parallel imaging and dobutamine stress magnetic resonance imaging in patients with atypical chest pain or equivocal ECG not suitable for stress echocardiography.

Authors:  E Di Cesare; S Battisti; A Riva; C Corbacelli; G De Bernardinis; S Cicogna; C Masciocchi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 9.  How is risk defined in high-risk surgical patient management?

Authors:  Owen Boyd; Neil Jackson
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Prognostic implications of negative dobutamine stress echocardiography in African Americans compared to Caucasians.

Authors:  Ajay V Srivastava; Karthik Ananthasubramaniam; Salil J Patel; Natesh Lingam; Gordon Jacobsen
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 2.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.