Literature DB >> 22142841

Occurrence of secondary fracture around intramedullary nails used for trochanteric hip fractures: a systematic review of 13,568 patients.

Rory Norris1, Dhritiman Bhattacharjee, Martyn J Parker.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A sliding hip screw (SHS) is currently the treatment of choice for trochanteric hip fractures, largely due to the low incidence of complications. An alternative treatment is the use of intramedullary proximal femoral nails. Unfortunately these implants have been associated with a risk of later fracture around the implant. The aim of this study was to see if any improvements have been made to the current intramedullary nails, to reduce the incidence of secondary fracture around the distal tip of the nail.
METHODS: We analysed data related to 13,568 patients from 89 studies, focusing on the incidence of post operative secondary femoral shaft fracture following the use of intramedullary nails in the fixation of trochanteric hip fractures.
RESULTS: The overall reported incidence of secondary fracture around the nail was 1.7%. The incidence of fracture has reduced in the 3rd generation Gamma nails when compared to the older Gamma nail (1.7% versus 2.6%, p value 0.03). However, the incidence of secondary fracture in the 3rd generation Gamma nails is still significantly higher than the other brands of short nail (1.7% versus 0.7%, p value 0.0005). Long nails had a slight tendency towards a lower risk of fracture although the difference was not statistically significant (1.1% versus 1.7%, p value 0.28). There was a significantly lower risk of fracture for those nails with a biaxial fixation as opposed to uniaxial fixation (0.6% versus 1.9%, p value <0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Secondary fracture around a proximal femoral nail is one of the most significant of fracture healing complications, and this study suggests that continuing design changes to this method of fixation has reduced the risk of this complication occurring.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22142841     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.10.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  38 in total

1.  Comparative study of InterTAN and Dynamic Hip Screw in treatment of femoral intertrochanteric injury and wound.

Authors:  Qiang Wang; Xin Yang; Hua-Zheng He; Li-Jun Dong; De-Gang Huang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-15

2.  Is distal locking of long nails for intertrochanteric fractures necessary? A clinical study.

Authors:  Bryan G Vopat; Patrick M Kane; Jeremy Truntzer; Philip McClure; David Paller; Emily Abbood; Christopher Born
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2014-07-28

3.  Short versus long intramedullary nails for treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures (AO 31-A1 and AO 31-A2): a systematic review.

Authors:  Pernille Bovbjerg; Lonnie Froberg; Hagen Schmal
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-07-18

4.  Biomechanical evaluation of the risk of secondary fracture around short versus long cephalomedullary nails.

Authors:  William E Daner; John R Owen; Jennifer S Wayne; Ryan B Graves; Mark C Willis
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-06-08

Review 5.  Intertrochanteric fractures: a review of fixation methods.

Authors:  Senthil Nathan Sambandam; Jayadev Chandrasekharan; Varatharaj Mounasamy; Cyril Mauffrey
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-03-30

6.  How are peri-implant fractures below short versus long cephalomedullary nails different?

Authors:  L Henry Goodnough; Brett P Salazar; Jamie Furness; James E Feng; Malcolm R DeBaun; Sean T Campbell; Justin F Lucas; William W Cross; Philipp Leucht; Kevin D Grant; Michael J Gardner; Julius A Bishop
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-09-09

7.  Peri-implant fracture of the distal tibia after intra-medullary nailing of a tibial fracture: a report of two cases.

Authors:  Varatharaj Mounasamy; Pingal Desai
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-08-11

8.  Complications of short versus long cephalomedullary nail for intertrochanteric femur fractures, minimum 1 year follow-up.

Authors:  Josh Vaughn; Eric Cohen; Bryan G Vopat; Patrick Kane; Emily Abbood; Christopher Born
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-10-22

9.  How evolution of the nailing system improves results and reduces orthopedic complications: more than 2000 cases of trochanteric fractures treated with the Gamma Nail System.

Authors:  R Pascarella; R Fantasia; A Maresca; C Bettuzzi; L Amendola; S Violini; F Cuoghi; P Sangiovanni; S Cerbasi; S Boriani; D S Tigani
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2015-12-14

10.  Rehabilitation protocols in unstable trochanteric fractures treated with cephalomedullary nails in elderly: current practices and outcome.

Authors:  Xavier Lizano-Díez; Marius Johann Baptist Keel; Klaus Arno Siebenrock; Marc Tey; Johannes Dominik Bastian
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 3.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.