Crystal L Dussault1, Lisa L Weyandt. 1. Psychology Department, University of Rhode Island, 10 Chafee Road, Kingston, RI 02881, USA. sweethrt3884@yahoo.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine nonmedical stimulant use among fraternity/sorority members and nonmembers and whether psychological variables (e.g., internal restlessness, depression, anxiety, and stress) were related to nonmedical stimulant use. METHOD: The sample consisted of 1,033 undergraduate students from five universities located in the northeastern, southeastern, northwestern, southwestern, and midwestern regions of the United States. RESULTS: The findings revealed that fraternity and sorority members reported a higher rate of nonmedical stimulant use than nonmembers. In addition, regression analyses revealed that higher ratings of anxiety, stress, internal impulsivity, and internal restlessness significantly predicted nonmedical stimulant use. CONCLUSION: Current findings support further examination of nonmedical stimulant use among other college student subpopulations (i.e., athletic teams, honor societies, residence halls). In addition, there is a strong need to develop research-based intervention and preventive measures that target college populations identified as being at risk for nonmedical stimulant use.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine nonmedical stimulant use among fraternity/sorority members and nonmembers and whether psychological variables (e.g., internal restlessness, depression, anxiety, and stress) were related to nonmedical stimulant use. METHOD: The sample consisted of 1,033 undergraduate students from five universities located in the northeastern, southeastern, northwestern, southwestern, and midwestern regions of the United States. RESULTS: The findings revealed that fraternity and sorority members reported a higher rate of nonmedical stimulant use than nonmembers. In addition, regression analyses revealed that higher ratings of anxiety, stress, internal impulsivity, and internal restlessness significantly predicted nonmedical stimulant use. CONCLUSION: Current findings support further examination of nonmedical stimulant use among other college student subpopulations (i.e., athletic teams, honor societies, residence halls). In addition, there is a strong need to develop research-based intervention and preventive measures that target college populations identified as being at risk for nonmedical stimulant use.
Authors: Lisa L Weyandt; Danielle R Oster; Marisa E Marraccini; Bergljot Gyda Gudmundsdottir; Bailey A Munro; Emma S Rathkey; Alison McCallum Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Patricia A Goodhines; Lea E Taylor; Michelle J Zaso; Kevin M Antshel; Aesoon Park Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2020-08-04 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Morgan M Philbin; Emily R Greene; Silvia S Martins; Natalie J LaBossier; Pia M Mauro Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2020-09-24 Impact factor: 5.043