| Literature DB >> 22141397 |
Maria Salgado1, S Alireza Rabi, Karen A O'Connell, Robert W Buckheit, Justin R Bailey, Amina A Chaudhry, Autumn R Breaud, Mark A Marzinke, William Clarke, Joseph B Margolick, Robert F Siliciano, Joel N Blankson.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While initiation of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) during primary HIV-1 infection occasionally results in transient control of viral replication after treatment interruption, the vast majority of patients eventually experience a rebound in plasma viremia.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22141397 PMCID: PMC3293762 DOI: 10.1186/1742-4690-8-97
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Retrovirology ISSN: 1742-4690 Impact factor: 4.602
Figure 1Clinical characteristics of Patient 169. The patient's CD4 counts and viral load are shown. Viral load measurements below the limit of detection are denoted by open symbols. The time on HAART is denoted by the shaded region.
Differences in sequence of replication-competent 1999 and 2010 isolates.
| Differences between Pt-169 1999 and 2010-1A/1B isolates | ||
|---|---|---|
| Nucleotides | Amino Acids | |
| LTR | 2 | |
| Gag | Δ18* | Δ6* |
| Pol | 2 | 2 |
| Vif | 0 | 0 |
| Vpr | 1 | 1 |
| Vpu | 0 | 0 |
| Env | 2, Δ21 (V4)* | 1, Δ7 (V4)* |
| Nef | 1 | 1 |
| Total | 47 | 18 |
Isolate 2B from 2010 is identical to the 1999 isolate with the exception of a single nucleotide in the LTR. Isolates 1A and 1B are identical to each other.
* The triangle denotes deletions in the 2010-1A/1B isolates.
Figure 2Phylogenetic Analysis: An alignment of the variable regions of env is shown for replication-competent isolates obtained from Patient 169 and his spouse. Numbering is from the first amino acid in gp120. (A). The sequences are also compared to other Clade B sequences(B). Phylogenies were estimated by using a classical approach, functioning under a maximum-likelihood (ML) optimality criterion.
Figure 3Phenotypic analyses of viral isolates from Patient 169. (A) Viral tropism was determined using GHOST cells expressing CCR5 and/or CXCR4. Open bars were below the limit of the detection (B) Replication kinetics was determined in primary CD4+ T cells (left) and the MT-2 cell line (right).
Analysis of genetic factors associated with protection in HIV-1 infection
| Genetic factors | |
|---|---|
| CCR5 | wild type |
| HLA-A | *3001, *6801 |
| HLA C SNP (rs9264942) | T/C |
Figure 4CD4+ T cell susceptibility assay. CD4+ T cells from five healthy donors (grey columns) and Patient 169 (shaded column) were infected with CCR5 tropic (Bal) and CXCR4 tropic (NL43) pseudotypevirus by spinoculation (A) or with NL43pseudotype virus without spinoculation (B). Infection with serial dilutions of CXCR4-tropic (C), CCR5-tropic (D) and dual-tropic virus (E) was also performed by spinoculation. The percent of infected cells (GFP positive) are shown.
Figure 5Titers of HIV-specific neutralizing antibodies. (A) Neutralizing activity of plasma from viremic patients, ES, and patient 169 against recombinant virus with Env from the laboratory strain SF162. The open symbols denote titers that were greater than 1:4. (B) Neutralizing activity of plasma from Patient 169 against recombinant virus with Env from 1999 and 2010-1A isolates. Relative infection of TZMb1 cells by the recombinant isolates is shown in the presence of four fold dilutions of plasma.
Figure 6CD8+ T cell epitope analysis. Epitopes in Nef (A) and Gag (B) targeted by CD8+ T cells as determined by an IFN-g ELISPOT assay using overlapping 15 mers. Open boxes represent actual peptides targeted in the assay whereas the shaded boxes represent predicted optimal HLA-B*42 restricted epiotpes which were not targeted.
Figure 7CD8+ T cell functional analysis. The effect of CD8+ T cell depletion on autologous virus outgrowth is shown by a comparison of virus replication in activated unfractionated PBMC or activated PBMC from which CD8+ T cells were depleted (A). The ability of CD8+ T cells to inhibit replication of GFP expression virus in activated autologous CD4+ T cells is shown. Open bars were below the limit of the detection. (B) by comparing the percentage of infected CD4+ T cells (GFP positive) in the absence and presence of CD8+ T cells.