Literature DB >> 22140193

Process analysis to reduce MRI access time at a German University Hospital.

S Tokur1, K Lederle, D D Terris, M N Jarczok, S Bender, S O Schoenberg, G Weisser.   

Abstract

QUALITY PROBLEM OR ISSUE: Long access times for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can negatively impact the quality of care provided to patients. We investigated improving access by reducing MRI processing time. INITIAL ASSESSMENT: Data were collected for scans (n= 360) performed over 3 weeks (April-May 2008) at the University Hospital of Mannheim, Germany. Average access time, excluding emergencies, was 44 (±44) days for outpatients and 3 (±5) days for inpatients. Factors influencing total MRI processing time were identified using multivariate linear regression. In addition to region scanned, the total MRI processing time was significantly related to performing multiple scans (β = 33.57, P< 0.01), using oral contrast media (β = 13.58, P< 0.01), placing an intravenous (IV) catheter (β = 5.00, P= 0.04) and scanning patients ≤8 years old (β = 0.41, P= 0.03). Contrary to prior perceptions, emergency cases (5.6%) and late arrivals (12.8% >5 min late) were less than expected. CHOICE OF SOLUTION: Increasing scheduling flexibility to address non-modifiable process variation and completing preparatory activities outside the scanner room were identified as process improvement targets. IMPLEMENTATION: Scheduling was adapted to utilize three expected total MRI processing times and IV placement was moved outside the scanner room. EVALUATION: Planned hardware and software upgrades were completed concurrent to the process improvements. As a result, it was not possible to accurately measure the effect of implementing the scheduling and preparatory activity changes. LESSONS LEARNED: Clinical study team members' prior perceptions of workflow obstacles did not match the study findings. Utilizing insiders and outsiders during process analysis may limit bias in identification of process improvement opportunities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22140193     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  4 in total

1.  How much abdominal fat do obese patients lose short term after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy? A quantitative study evaluated with MRI.

Authors:  Jing Sun; Han Lv; Mengyi Li; Lei Zhao; Yawen Liu; Na Zeng; Xuan Wei; Qian Chen; Pengling Ren; Yang Liu; Peng Zhang; Zhenghan Yang; Zhongtao Zhang; Zhenchang Wang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-11

2.  Neuroimaging for Pediatric Non-First-Time Seizures in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Emma Mazzio; Rakesh D Mistry; Scott Rosenthal; Eileen Ser; Jerry Jewell; Jan Martin; Ricka Messer; Megan Straley; Jan Leonard; Craig A Press
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2022-06

3.  The analysis of waiting time and utilization of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in Croatia: a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Zrinka Biloglav; Petar Medaković; Jure Buljević; Franko Žuvela; Ivan Padjen; Dina Vrkić; Josip Ćurić
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 1.351

Review 4.  The effectiveness of service delivery initiatives at improving patients' waiting times in clinical radiology departments: a systematic review.

Authors:  B Olisemeke; Y F Chen; K Hemming; A Girling
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.056

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.