Literature DB >> 22139029

Better functional outcome provided by short-armed sigmoid colon-rectal side-to-end anastomosis after laparoscopic low anterior resection: a match-paired retrospective study from China.

Yuan-Chuan Zhang1, Xiao-Dong Jin, Yu-Ting Zhang, Zi-Qiang Wang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Side-to-end anastomosis using the descending colon has been proved to be as effective as J pouch in alleviating low anterior resection syndrome. However, using the sigmoid colon, which is less compliant for reconstruction after rectal cancer surgery, is common in China due to less prevalence of diverticulosis. The effectiveness of using the sigmoid colon for a side-to-end colorectal anastomosis in improving bowel dysfunction after laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer has not been investigated. This study was designed to compare the functional and surgical outcomes between the two anastomoses.
METHODS: From October 2007 to December 2008, 16 rectal cancer patients underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection with short-armed (length of side limb 2-4 cm) side-to-end sigmoidorectal anastomosis at our department. The bowel functional results of these patients at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively were recorded and compared with that of another 1:2 matched 30 patients undergoing straight anastomosis.
RESULTS: Bowel movement frequency in the side-to-end group was obviously less than that in the straight group 6 months postoperatively. Patients in the side-to-end group also had an improved incontinence score, a better ability to defer defecation, and less repeated evacuation. No differences were found between two groups 1 year after surgery.
CONCLUSION: The study shows that the short-armed side-to-end colorectal anastomosis using the sigmoid colon can also improve the short-term bowel function in patients undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22139029     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-011-1359-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  17 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Andrea Vignali; Luca Gianotti; Walter Zuliani; Giovanni Radaelli; Paola Gruarin; Paolo Dellabona; Valerio Di Carlo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Neorectal reservoir is not the functional principle of the colonic J-pouch: the volume of a short colonic J-pouch does not differ from a straight coloanal anastomosis.

Authors:  Alois Fürst; Karin Burghofer; Lilli Hutzel; Karl-Walter Jauch
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Comparison of functional and surgical outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted colonic J-pouch versus straight reconstruction after total mesorectal excision for lower rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jin-Tung Liang; Hong-Shiee Lai; Po-Huang Lee; Kuo-Chin Huang
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Colonic pouch vs. side-to-end anastomosis in low anterior resection.

Authors:  F T Huber; B Herter; J R Siewert
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Laser Doppler blood flow measurement in rectal resection for carcinoma--comparison between the straight and colonic J pouch reconstruction.

Authors:  O Hallböök; K Johansson; R Sjödahl
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Physiologic characteristics of straight and colonic J-pouch anastomoses after rectal excision for cancer.

Authors:  O Hallböök; P O Nystrom; R Sjödahl
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer.

Authors:  E Rullier; C Laurent; J L Garrelon; P Michel; J Saric; M Parneix
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Resection of the rectum with construction of a colonic reservoir and colo-anal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum.

Authors:  F Lazorthes; P Fages; P Chiotasso; J Lemozy; E Bloom
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Resection and colo-anal anastomosis with colonic reservoir for rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  R Parc; E Tiret; P Frileux; E Moszkowski; J Loygue
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Why do some patients experience poor functional results after anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma?

Authors:  W G Lewis; I G Martin; M E Williamson; B M Stephenson; P J Holdsworth; P J Finan; D Johnston
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Safety and efficacy of side-to-end anastomosis versus colonic J-pouch anastomosis in sphincter-preserving resections: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Sen Hou; Quan Wang; Shidong Zhao; Fan Liu; Peng Guo; Yingjiang Ye
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 2.754

2.  Long-term effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by sphincter-preserving resection on anal sphincter function in relation to quality of life among locally advanced rectal cancer patients: a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Zerrin Ozgen; Sevgi Ozden; Beste M Atasoy; Hazan Ozyurt; Rasim Gencosmanoglu; Nese Imeryuz
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.481

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.