Literature DB >> 22138323

A review of statistical methods for prediction of proteolytic cleavage.

David A duVerle1, Hiroshi Mamitsuka.   

Abstract

A fundamental component of systems biology, proteolytic cleavage is involved in nearly all aspects of cellular activities: from gene regulation to cell lifecycle regulation. Current sequencing technologies have made it possible to compile large amount of cleavage data and brought greater understanding of the underlying protein interactions. However, the practical impossibility to exhaustively retrieve substrate sequences through experimentation alone has long highlighted the need for efficient computational prediction methods. Such methods must be able to quickly mark substrate candidates and putative cleavage sites for further analysis. Available methods and expected reliability depend heavily on the type and complexity of proteolytic action, as well as the availability of well-labelled experimental data sets: factors varying greatly across enzyme families. For this review, we chose to give a quick overview of the general issues and challenges in cleavage prediction methods followed by a more in-depth presentation of major techniques and implementations, with a focus on two particular families of cysteine proteases: caspases and calpains. Through their respective differences in proteolytic specificity (high for caspases, broader for calpains) and data availability (much lower for calpains), we aimed to illustrate the strengths and limitations of techniques ranging from position-based matrices and decision trees to more flexible machine-learning methods such as hidden Markov models and Support Vector Machines. In addition to a technical overview for each family of algorithms, we tried to provide elements of evaluation and performance comparison across methods.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22138323     DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbr059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brief Bioinform        ISSN: 1467-5463            Impact factor:   11.622


  9 in total

1.  Twenty years of bioinformatics research for protease-specific substrate and cleavage site prediction: a comprehensive revisit and benchmarking of existing methods.

Authors:  Fuyi Li; Yanan Wang; Chen Li; Tatiana T Marquez-Lago; André Leier; Neil D Rawlings; Gholamreza Haffari; Jerico Revote; Tatsuya Akutsu; Kuo-Chen Chou; Anthony W Purcell; Robert N Pike; Geoffrey I Webb; A Ian Smith; Trevor Lithgow; Roger J Daly; James C Whisstock; Jiangning Song
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 11.622

2.  Antagonism of the STING Pathway via Activation of the AIM2 Inflammasome by Intracellular DNA.

Authors:  Leticia Corrales; Seng-Ryong Woo; Jason B Williams; Sarah M McWhirter; Thomas W Dubensky; Thomas F Gajewski
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 5.422

3.  The importance of physicochemical characteristics and nonlinear classifiers in determining HIV-1 protease specificity.

Authors:  Timmy Manning; Paul Walsh
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 3.269

4.  PROSPERous: high-throughput prediction of substrate cleavage sites for 90 proteases with improved accuracy.

Authors:  Jiangning Song; Fuyi Li; André Leier; Tatiana T Marquez-Lago; Tatsuya Akutsu; Gholamreza Haffari; Kuo-Chen Chou; Geoffrey I Webb; Robert N Pike; John Hancock
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Deep Learning-Based Advances In Protein Posttranslational Modification Site and Protein Cleavage Prediction.

Authors:  Subash C Pakhrin; Suresh Pokharel; Hiroto Saigo; Dukka B Kc
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

6.  Predictions of Cleavability of Calpain Proteolysis by Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Analysis Using Newly Determined Cleavage Sites and Catalytic Efficiencies of an Oligopeptide Array.

Authors:  Fumiko Shinkai-Ouchi; Suguru Koyama; Yasuko Ono; Shoji Hata; Koichi Ojima; Mayumi Shindo; David duVerle; Mika Ueno; Fujiko Kitamura; Naoko Doi; Ichigaku Takigawa; Hiroshi Mamitsuka; Hiroyuki Sorimachi
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 5.911

7.  Cleavage entropy as quantitative measure of protease specificity.

Authors:  Julian E Fuchs; Susanne von Grafenstein; Roland G Huber; Michael A Margreiter; Gudrun M Spitzer; Hannes G Wallnoefer; Klaus R Liedl
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  SVM-based prediction of propeptide cleavage sites in spider toxins identifies toxin innovation in an Australian tarantula.

Authors:  Emily S W Wong; Margaret C Hardy; David Wood; Timothy Bailey; Glenn F King
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Toward more accurate prediction of caspase cleavage sites: a comprehensive review of current methods, tools and features.

Authors:  Yu Bao; Simone Marini; Takeyuki Tamura; Mayumi Kamada; Shingo Maegawa; Hiroshi Hosokawa; Jiangning Song; Tatsuya Akutsu
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 11.622

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.