Literature DB >> 35696087

Deep Learning-Based Advances In Protein Posttranslational Modification Site and Protein Cleavage Prediction.

Subash C Pakhrin1, Suresh Pokharel2, Hiroto Saigo3, Dukka B Kc4.   

Abstract

Posttranslational modification (PTM ) is a ubiquitous phenomenon in both eukaryotes and prokaryotes which gives rise to enormous proteomic diversity. PTM mostly comes in two flavors: covalent modification to polypeptide chain and proteolytic cleavage. Understanding and characterization of PTM is a fundamental step toward understanding the underpinning of biology. Recent advances in experimental approaches, mainly mass-spectrometry-based approaches, have immensely helped in obtaining and characterizing PTMs. However, experimental approaches are not enough to understand and characterize more than 450 different types of PTMs and complementary computational approaches are becoming popular. Recently, due to the various advancements in the field of Deep Learning (DL), along with the explosion of applications of DL to various fields, the field of computational prediction of PTM has also witnessed the development of a plethora of deep learning (DL)-based approaches. In this book chapter, we first review some recent DL-based approaches in the field of PTM site prediction. In addition, we also review the recent advances in the not-so-studied PTM , that is, proteolytic cleavage predictions. We describe advances in PTM prediction by highlighting the Deep learning architecture, feature encoding, novelty of the approaches, and availability of the tools/approaches. Finally, we provide an outlook and possible future research directions for DL-based approaches for PTM prediction.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep learning; Machine learning; Phosphorylation; Posttranslational modification site; Proteolytic cleavage

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35696087     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2317-6_15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  82 in total

1.  Sequence and structure-based prediction of eukaryotic protein phosphorylation sites.

Authors:  N Blom; S Gammeltoft; S Brunak
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-12-17       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 2.  Prediction of post-translational glycosylation and phosphorylation of proteins from the amino acid sequence.

Authors:  Nikolaj Blom; Thomas Sicheritz-Pontén; Ramneek Gupta; Steen Gammeltoft; Søren Brunak
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.984

3.  A support vector machine approach to the identification of phosphorylation sites.

Authors:  Dariusz Plewczyński; Adrian Tkacz; Adam Godzik; Leszek Rychlewski
Journal:  Cell Mol Biol Lett       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.787

Review 4.  Mapping protein post-translational modifications with mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Eric S Witze; William M Old; Katheryn A Resing; Natalie G Ahn
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 5.  Prediction of posttranslational modification of proteins from their amino acid sequence.

Authors:  Birgit Eisenhaber; Frank Eisenhaber
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2010

Review 6.  Computational prediction of eukaryotic phosphorylation sites.

Authors:  Brett Trost; Anthony Kusalik
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Prediction of in-vivo modification sites of proteins from their primary structures.

Authors:  K Nakai; M Kanehisa
Journal:  J Biochem       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.387

Review 8.  Protein post-translational modifications in bacteria.

Authors:  Boris Macek; Karl Forchhammer; Julie Hardouin; Eilika Weber-Ban; Christophe Grangeasse; Ivan Mijakovic
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 9.  Protein post-translational modifications: In silico prediction tools and molecular modeling.

Authors:  Martina Audagnotto; Matteo Dal Peraro
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 7.271

Review 10.  Deep Learning in Proteomics.

Authors:  Bo Wen; Wen-Feng Zeng; Yuxing Liao; Zhiao Shi; Sara R Savage; Wen Jiang; Bing Zhang
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.984

View more
  1 in total

1.  Improving protein succinylation sites prediction using embeddings from protein language model.

Authors:  Suresh Pokharel; Pawel Pratyush; Michael Heinzinger; Robert H Newman; Dukka B Kc
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.