Ling-Ping Chen1, Shyh-Jer Lin, Ming-Sun Yu. 1. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, 386 Ta-Chung 1st Road, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, R.O.C. xguaalu@yahoo.com.tw
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Besides International Prognostic Index, many parameters have proven prognostic significance in aggressive lymphoma. However, the most appropriate system of risk stratification in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is not yet clear. In this study, we attempt to clarify the prognostic value of platelet count at the onset of lymphoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2000 and December 2009, 100 patients with DLBCL receiving R-CEOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone) in a single institution were enrolled. Patient characteristics and survival outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Before front-line treatment, 17 patients with thrombocytopenia (< 150 × 10(9)/L) and 83 patients without thrombocytopenia were enrolled. Thrombocytopenic patients initially presented with more B symptoms (P = .040), more bone marrow involvement (P = .001), later staging (P = .001), and higher International Prognostic Index (P < .001). Thrombocytopenia was shown to be an independently poor prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis of overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 3.405; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.431-8.101; P = .006) and progression-free survival (HR, 4.299; 95% CI, 1.786-10.343; P = .001). CONCLUSION: Platelet count at diagnosis is a simple but useful indicator for predicting survival outcomes of DLBCL. Although the mechanisms of thrombocytopenia may be complex in lymphoma, further investigations are warranted to illustrate the predictive merit.
BACKGROUND: Besides International Prognostic Index, many parameters have proven prognostic significance in aggressive lymphoma. However, the most appropriate system of risk stratification in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is not yet clear. In this study, we attempt to clarify the prognostic value of platelet count at the onset of lymphoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2000 and December 2009, 100 patients with DLBCL receiving R-CEOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone) in a single institution were enrolled. Patient characteristics and survival outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Before front-line treatment, 17 patients with thrombocytopenia (< 150 × 10(9)/L) and 83 patients without thrombocytopenia were enrolled. Thrombocytopenicpatients initially presented with more B symptoms (P = .040), more bone marrow involvement (P = .001), later staging (P = .001), and higher International Prognostic Index (P < .001). Thrombocytopenia was shown to be an independently poor prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis of overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 3.405; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.431-8.101; P = .006) and progression-free survival (HR, 4.299; 95% CI, 1.786-10.343; P = .001). CONCLUSION: Platelet count at diagnosis is a simple but useful indicator for predicting survival outcomes of DLBCL. Although the mechanisms of thrombocytopenia may be complex in lymphoma, further investigations are warranted to illustrate the predictive merit.