Literature DB >> 22137493

Knowledge and attitudes regarding expanded genetic carrier screening among women's healthcare providers.

Kaylene Ready1, Imran S Haque, Balaji S Srinivasan, John R Marshall.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine women's healthcare providers' knowledge and attitudes regarding genetic disorders and expanded genetic screening.
DESIGN: Survey of American Society for Reproductive Medicine 2010 and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2011 Annual Meeting attendees. The survey included 60 items (12 demographic, 10 knowledge, and 38 attitude). Attitudes were assessed with a 5-point Likert scale. Chi-square or t tests determined significance.
SETTING: American Society for Reproductive Medicine 2010 and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2011 Annual Meeting. PATIENT(S): A total of 203 participants completed the survey. Of these, 48% were male, 61% were physicians, 73% were Caucasian, and 42% were aged 35-50 years. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): None. RESULT(S): Physicians had better knowledge scores than other participants (87% vs. 79%). Knowledge was not influenced by prior personal/family experience with genetic screening. Fewer correct answers were observed for the probability of a positive test (65.2%), the risk of transmitting a gene mutation (62.2%), and the risk of having an affected child (56.2%). Very few participants (18.3%) disagreed with the notion of carrier screening as socially responsible behavior. Some had concerns about test result confidentiality (40.1%) and resulting insurance rate increases (37.0%). Assuming equal costs, most participants preferred to be tested for a larger number of diseases (77.7%) and believed posttest counseling to be helpful (83.7%). CONCLUSION(S): Women's healthcare providers generally had good knowledge and positive attitudes about genetic disorders and expanded genetic screening. Specific misperceptions, both medical and legal, require education.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22137493     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  16 in total

1.  Structurating Expanded Genetic Carrier Screening: A Longitudinal Analysis of Online News Coverage.

Authors:  Heather E Canary; Yvonne K Clark; Avery Holton
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2018-05-25

2.  Comparison of Informed Consent Preferences for Multiplex Genetic Carrier Screening among a Diverse Population.

Authors:  Ashley Reeves; Angela Trepanier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Attitude of Reproductive Healthcare Providers to Prenatal Diagnosis in a Low Resource Nigerian Setting.

Authors:  Leonard Ogbonna Ajah; Silas Alegu Nwali; Christopher Chim Amah; Theophilus Ogochukwu Nwankwo; Lucky Osaheni Lawani; Benjamin Chukwuma Ozumba
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-02-01

4.  Expanded carrier screening: a current survey of physician utilization and attitudes.

Authors:  Allison Briggs; Parvaneh K Nouri; Michael Galloway; Kathleen O'Leary; Nigel Pereira; Steven R Lindheim
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Attitudes of health care professionals toward carrier screening for cystic fibrosis. A review of the literature.

Authors:  S Janssens; A De Paepe; P Borry
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-12-29

6.  Advantages of expanded universal carrier screening: what is at stake?

Authors:  Sanne van der Hout; Kim Ca Holtkamp; Lidewij Henneman; Guido de Wert; Wybo J Dondorp
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Expanded carrier screening in reproductive healthcare: perspectives from genetics professionals.

Authors:  D Cho; M L McGowan; J Metcalfe; R R Sharp
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-04-14       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Swedish healthcare providers' perceptions of preconception expanded carrier screening (ECS)-a qualitative study.

Authors:  A Matar; U Kihlbom; A T Höglund
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2016-05-25

9.  Health practitioners' perceptions of the barriers and enablers to the implementation of reproductive genetic carrier screening: A systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie Best; Janet Long; Tahlia Theodorou; Sarah Hatem; Rebecca Lake; Alison Archibald; Lucinda Freeman; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 3.050

10.  Expanded carrier screening in an infertile population: how often is clinical decision making affected?

Authors:  Jason M Franasiak; Meir Olcha; Paul A Bergh; Kathleen H Hong; Marie D Werner; Eric J Forman; Rebekah S Zimmerman; Richard T Scott
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.