Literature DB >> 22136978

Comparative efficacy and safety profile of amlodipine 5 mg/losartan 50 mg fixed-dose combination and amlodipine 10 mg monotherapy in hypertensive patients who respond poorly to amlodipine 5 mg monotherapy: an 8-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind phase III noninferiority study.

Seok-Min Kang1, Jong-Chan Youn, Shung Chull Chae, Chang Gyu Park, Joo Young Yang, Moo Hyun Kim, Taek Jong Hong, Cheol Ho Kim, Jae Joong Kim, Dong Gu Shin, Jin Won Jeong, Jin Won Jung, Jung Han Yoon, Si Hoon Park, Jun Kwon, Seung Yun Cho.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The number of hypertensive patients achieving treatment targets is not ideal with therapies that engage a single mechanism of action, and combination therapies using different mechanisms of action can increase drug efficacy in a synergistic way.
OBJECTIVE: This noninferiority study compared the clinical efficacy and safety profile of fixed-dose combination of amlodipine/losartan 5/50 mg and amlodipine 10 mg monotherapy in essential hypertensive patients who respond poorly to amlodipine 5 mg monotherapy.
METHODS: This was a double-blind, multicenter, randomized trial of hypertensive patients (N = 185) aged ≥18 years taking amlodipine 5 mg during the run-in treatment period but failed to achieve sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) <90 mm Hg. After randomization into the amlodipine/losartan 5/50 mg fixed-dose combination group (n = 92) and the amlodipine 10 mg monotherapy group (n = 93), treatment was maintained without dose escalation for 8 weeks. The noninferiority margin was prespecified as 4 mm Hg after 8 weeks of treatment for the difference of the average change in DBP between treatments. The primary efficacy evaluation of noninferiority was tested using a confidence interval approach with a 97.5% 1-sided lower confidence limit using the average difference in DBP measured at baseline and 8 weeks.
RESULTS: After 8 weeks, the DBP of both groups decreased from baseline by 8.9 (6.1) and 9.4 (7.5) mm Hg, respectively (difference = -0.5 [6.9] mm Hg, 95% CI: -2.5 to 1.5). Secondary end points of reductions in DBP after 4 weeks (-8.1 [6.7] vs -9.9 [7.3] mm Hg, difference = -1.8 mm Hg, 95% CI: -3.9 to 0.2) and sitting systolic blood pressure after 4 (-10.2 [11.8] vs -12.8 [10.2] mm Hg, difference = -2.6 mm Hg, 95% CI: -5.9 to 0.6) and 8 weeks (-12.2 [11.0] vs -13.4 [11.3] mm Hg, difference = -1.2 mmHg, 95% CI: -4.4 to 2.1) were comparable between the 2 treatment groups. There were 38 adverse events in 20 patients (21.7%) in the amlodipine/losartan 5/50 mg fixed-dose combination group and 31 in 24 patients (26.1%) in the amlodipine 10 mg monotherapy group; most were mild. There were 7 adverse events in 6 patients (6.5%) related to treatment in the fixed-dose combination group and 13 in 10 patients (10.9%) in the monotherapy group (P = 0.30).
CONCLUSIONS: Fixed-dose combination amlodipine/losartan 5/50 mg was not inferior in terms of reductions in DBP after 8 weeks of treatment and had comparable safety profile to amlodipine 10 mg in patients who did not respond to amlodipine 5 mg monotherapy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00940667.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22136978     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  6 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of adding an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) to a calcium channel blocker (CCB) following ineffective CCB monotherapy.

Authors:  Jin Ma; Xiao-Yan Wang; Zhi-De Hu; Zhi-Rui Zhou; Paul Schoenhagen; Hao Wang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  High-dose calcium channel blocker (CCB) monotherapy vs combination therapy of standard-dose CCBs and angiotensin receptor blockers for hypertension: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  T He; X Liu; Y Li; X Y Liu; Q Y Wu; M L Liu; H Yuan
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.012

3.  Comparisons of the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of fixed-dose combinations of amlodipine besylate/losartan and amlodipine camsylate/losartan in healthy subjects: a randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-period, two-sequence crossover study.

Authors:  YoonJung Choi; SeungHwan Lee; Sang-Min Cho; Won-Ho Kang; Kyu-Yeol Nam; In-Jin Jang; Kyung-Sang Yu
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.162

4.  Comparative peripheral edema for dihydropyridines calcium channel blockers treatment: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ling Liang; Janice Y Kung; Bradley Mitchelmore; Andrew Cave; Hoan Linh Banh
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.885

5.  Evaluation of blood pressure reduction response and responder characteristics to fixed-dose combination treatment of amlodipine and losartan: a post hoc analysis of pooled clinical trials.

Authors:  Sreevalsa Unniachan; David Wu; Srinivasan Rajagopalan; Mary E Hanson; Kenji P Fujita
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Uptitrating amlodipine significantly reduces blood pressure in diabetic patients with hypertension: a retrospective, pooled analysis.

Authors:  Barrett W Jeffers; Rahul Bhambri; Jeffery Robbins
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2014-11-14
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.