Literature DB >> 27511478

High-dose calcium channel blocker (CCB) monotherapy vs combination therapy of standard-dose CCBs and angiotensin receptor blockers for hypertension: a meta-analysis.

T He1, X Liu1, Y Li2, X Y Liu1, Q Y Wu1, M L Liu3, H Yuan1,2.   

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of high-dose calcium channel blocker (CCB) monotherapy and standard-dose CCBs combined with angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) for patients with hypertension. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed in December 2015. Randomized controlled trials designed to identify the above goal were included. Thirteen trials including 2371 patients were identified. The standard-dose CCB/ARB combination resulted in a greater reduction of systolic blood pressure (WMD -2.52, 95% confidence interval (CI): -3.76 to -1.28) and diastolic blood pressure (weighted mean difference (WMD) -2.07, 95% CI: -3.73 to -0.42) compared to high-dose CCB monotherapy. The overall hypertension control rate for the CCB/ARB combination was higher than that for CCB monotherapy (relative risk (RR): 1.17, 95% CI: 1.08-1.26). Furthermore, the CCB/ARB combination treatment yielded significantly fewer overall adverse events (RR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.74-0.95), oedema (RR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.18-0.52) and rash (RR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.08-0.96, P=0.04) than did CCB monotherapy. The standard-dose CCB/ARB combination is superior to high-dose CCB monotherapy for lowering blood pressure and reducing adverse events in hypertensive patients. Future research should focus on the cost-effectiveness and long-term effects of these two treatment strategies for patients with hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27511478     DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2016.46

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  36 in total

1.  [National survey of blood pressure control rate in Chinese hypertensive outpatients-China STATUS].

Authors:  Da-yi Hu; Li-sheng Liu; Jin-ming Yu; Chong-hua Yao
Journal:  Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi       Date:  2010-03

2.  GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

Authors:  Gordon H Guyatt; Andrew D Oxman; Gunn E Vist; Regina Kunz; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-26

3.  Cutaneous adverse reactions to calcium channel blockers.

Authors:  Papapit Tuchinda; Kanokvalai Kulthanan; Sakunee Khankham; Kowit Jongjarearnprasert; Naruemon Dhana
Journal:  Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 4.  Calcium channel blockers and hypertension.

Authors:  Giuliano Tocci; Allegra Battistoni; Jasmine Passerini; Maria Beatrice Musumeci; Pietro Francia; Andrea Ferrucci; Massimo Volpe
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 2.457

5.  Comparative study of high dose mono-therapy of amlodipine or telmisartan, and their low dose combination in mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors:  Jaswant Goyal; Zafer Yab Khan; Prerna Upadhyaya; Barkha Goyal; Shipra Jain
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-06-20

6.  Amlodipine-induced petechial rash.

Authors:  M B Murthy; B Murthy
Journal:  J Postgrad Med       Date:  2011 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.476

Review 7.  Calcium channel blockers in the management of hypertension in the elderly.

Authors:  Francisco J Caballero-Gonzalez
Journal:  Cardiovasc Hematol Agents Med Chem       Date:  2015

8.  The combination of olmesartan medoxomil and amlodipine besylate in controlling high blood pressure: COACH, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week factorial efficacy and safety study.

Authors:  Steven G Chrysant; Michael Melino; Sulekha Karki; James Lee; Reinilde Heyrman
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.393

9.  Telmisartan and amlodipine single-pill combinations vs amlodipine monotherapy for superior blood pressure lowering and improved tolerability in patients with uncontrolled hypertension: results of the TEAMSTA-5 study.

Authors:  Steen Neldam; Margreet Lang; Russell Jones
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Effects of ACEIs Versus ARBs on Proteinuria or Albuminuria in Primary Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Rui Xu; Shanmei Sun; Yan Huo; Lin Yun; Shuai Huang; Guohua Li; Suhua Yan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.817

View more
  4 in total

1.  First-line combination therapy versus first-line monotherapy for primary hypertension.

Authors:  Javier Garjón; Luis Carlos Saiz; Ana Azparren; Idoia Gaminde; Mª José Ariz; Juan Erviti
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-02-06

2.  Comparison of Efficacies of Commonly Used Hypertension Treatment Modalities: A Retrospective Study of 1900 Participants in a Hypertension Clinic.

Authors:  Xiexiong Zhao; Anu Dahal; Qiong Yang; Yan Yang; Zewen Ding; Junwen Wang; Joel Dominic Swai; Weihong Jiang; Xiaogang Li
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-04-30

3.  Blood pressure lowering effect of calcium channel blockers on perioperative hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu Lin; Lina Ma
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Magnitude of and Characteristics Associated With the Treatment of Calcium Channel Blocker-Induced Lower-Extremity Edema With Loop Diuretics.

Authors:  Scott Martin Vouri; Xinyi Jiang; Todd M Manini; Laurence M Solberg; Carl Pepine; Daniel C Malone; Almut G Winterstein
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-12-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.