Literature DB >> 22136839

Comparison of clinical and imaging features in succinate dehydrogenase-positive versus sporadic paragangliomas.

Aradhana M Venkatesan1, Hari Trivedi, Karen T Adams, Electron Kebebew, Karel Pacak, Marybeth S Hughes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist concerning the clinical and imaging features that distinguish sporadic from familial paragangliomas (PGLs).
METHODS: Clinical, genetic (succinate dehydrogenase [SDHB] vs no SDHx), and imaging (computed tomography [CT], magnetic resonance imaging, (18)F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography [(18)F-FDG-PET]) features obtained during a decade in 124 PGL patients were studied. Data were analyzed by Fisher's exact test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
RESULTS: Mean age at diagnosis was younger in the SDHB-positive (SDHB+) group compared with the sporadic (no SDHx) group (28 vs 39 years, respectively, P < .001). Rate of supradiaphragmatic neoplasms were greater in the SDHB+ group (16.7 vs 4.7%, P = .11). Metastasis rates were greater in the SDHB+ group (78.9 vs 48.3%, P < .001), as was the existence of metastases or multiple PGLs at presentation (38.5 vs 16.7%, P < .05). Tumor volumes >250 mL were exclusively observed in SDHB+ patients (P < .05). On CT, SDHB+ tumors were more enhanced (P < .05). On (18)F-FDG-PET, SDHB+ tumors' had greater mean standard uptake values (12.3 vs 8.0, P < .05).
CONCLUSION: Clinically young age, large tumor volume, greater rate of metastatic and multifocal PGLs, greater SUV values on (18)F-FDG-PET, and increased CT enhancement are observed in SDHB+ PGLs. These findings may warrant genetic screening. Because SDHB+ patients demonstrate more supradiaphragmatic lesions, whole-body imaging may be of particular value in these patients.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Mosby, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22136839      PMCID: PMC3635828          DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.09.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  12 in total

1.  Mutations in SDHD, a mitochondrial complex II gene, in hereditary paraganglioma.

Authors:  B E Baysal; R E Ferrell; J E Willett-Brozick; E C Lawrence; D Myssiorek; A Bosch; A van der Mey; P E Taschner; W S Rubinstein; E N Myers; C W Richard; C J Cornelisse; P Devilee; B Devlin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-02-04       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Editorial: paraganglioma--all in the family.

Authors:  William F Young; Abbie L Abboud
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Gene mutations in the succinate dehydrogenase subunit SDHB cause susceptibility to familial pheochromocytoma and to familial paraganglioma.

Authors:  D Astuti; F Latif; A Dallol; P L Dahia; F Douglas; E George; F Sköldberg; E S Husebye; C Eng; E R Maher
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Predictors and prevalence of paraganglioma syndrome associated with mutations of the SDHC gene.

Authors:  Francesca Schiavi; Carsten C Boedeker; Birke Bausch; Mariola Peçzkowska; Clara Fuentes Gomez; Thomas Strassburg; Christian Pawlu; Mary Buchta; Maren Salzmann; Michael M Hoffmann; Ansgar Berlis; Ingo Brink; Markus Cybulla; Mihaela Muresan; Martin A Walter; Flavio Forrer; Matti Välimäki; Andrzej Kawecki; Zbigniew Szutkowski; Jörg Schipper; Martin K Walz; Pascal Pigny; Catherine Bauters; Joan E Willet-Brozick; Bora E Baysal; Andrzej Januszewicz; Charis Eng; Giuseppe Opocher; Hartmut P H Neumann
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Mutations in SDHC cause autosomal dominant paraganglioma, type 3.

Authors:  S Niemann; U Müller
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Clinical presentation and penetrance of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma syndromes.

Authors:  Diana E Benn; Anne-Paule Gimenez-Roqueplo; Jennifer R Reilly; Jérôme Bertherat; John Burgess; Karen Byth; Michael Croxson; Patricia L M Dahia; Marianne Elston; Oliver Gimm; David Henley; Philippe Herman; Victoria Murday; Patricia Niccoli-Sire; Janice L Pasieka; Vincent Rohmer; Kathy Tucker; Xavier Jeunemaitre; Deborah J Marsh; Pierre-François Plouin; Bruce G Robinson
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2005-11-29       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Prevalence of SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD germline mutations in clinic patients with head and neck paragangliomas.

Authors:  B E Baysal; J E Willett-Brozick; E C Lawrence; C M Drovdlic; S A Savul; D R McLeod; H A Yee; D E Brackmann; W H Slattery; E N Myers; R E Ferrell; W S Rubinstein
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.318

8.  Distinct clinical features of paraganglioma syndromes associated with SDHB and SDHD gene mutations.

Authors:  Hartmut P H Neumann; Christian Pawlu; Mariola Peczkowska; Birke Bausch; Sarah R McWhinney; Mihaela Muresan; Mary Buchta; Gerlind Franke; Joachim Klisch; Thorsten A Bley; Stefan Hoegerle; Carsten C Boedeker; Giuseppe Opocher; Jörg Schipper; Andrzej Januszewicz; Charis Eng
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-08-25       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Comparison of 18F-fluoro-L-DOPA, 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose, and 18F-fluorodopamine PET and 123I-MIBG scintigraphy in the localization of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma.

Authors:  Henri J L M Timmers; Clara C Chen; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Millie Whatley; Alexander Ling; Bastiaan Havekes; Graeme Eisenhofer; Lucia Martiniova; Karen T Adams; Karel Pacak
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 5.958

10.  Superiority of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to other functional imaging techniques in the evaluation of metastatic SDHB-associated pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma.

Authors:  Henri J L M Timmers; Anna Kozupa; Clara C Chen; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Alexander Ling; Graeme Eisenhofer; Karen T Adams; Daniel Solis; Jacques W M Lenders; Karel Pacak
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  5 in total

1.  Determination of the unmetabolised (18)F-FDG fraction by using an extension of simplified kinetic analysis method: clinical evaluation in paragangliomas.

Authors:  Dominique Barbolosi; Sebastien Hapdey; Stephanie Battini; Christian Faivre; Julien Mancini; Karel Pacak; Bardia Farman-Ara; David Taïeb
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Metabolic Subtyping of Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma by 18F-FDG Pharmacokinetics Using Dynamic PET/CT Scanning.

Authors:  Anouk van Berkel; Dennis Vriens; Eric P Visser; Marcel J R Janssen; Martin Gotthardt; Ad R M M Hermus; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Henri J L M Timmers
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Functional characterization of nonmetastatic paraganglioma and pheochromocytoma by (18) F-FDOPA PET: focus on missed lesions.

Authors:  Sophie Gabriel; Elise M Blanchet; Frédéric Sebag; Clara C Chen; Nicolas Fakhry; Arnaud Deveze; Anne Barlier; Isabelle Morange; Karel Pacak; David Taïeb
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 3.478

Review 4.  Non-invasive tumor genotyping using radiogenomic biomarkers, a systematic review and oncology-wide pathway analysis.

Authors:  Robin W Jansen; Paul van Amstel; Roland M Martens; Irsan E Kooi; Pieter Wesseling; Adrianus J de Langen; Catharina W Menke-Van der Houven van Oordt; Bernard H E Jansen; Annette C Moll; Josephine C Dorsman; Jonas A Castelijns; Pim de Graaf; Marcus C de Jong
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-04-13

Review 5.  Neuroendocrine tumours of the head and neck: anatomical, functional and molecular imaging and contemporary management.

Authors:  Navaraj Subedi; Robin Prestwich; Fahmid Chowdhury; Chirag Patel; Andrew Scarsbrook
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.909

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.