Literature DB >> 22135228

DCE and DW MRI in monitoring response to androgen deprivation therapy in patients with prostate cancer: a feasibility study.

T Barrett1, A B Gill, M Y Kataoka, A N Priest, I Joubert, M A McLean, M J Graves, S Stearn, D J Lomas, J R Griffiths, D Neal, V J Gnanapragasam, E Sala.   

Abstract

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a key primary treatment for advanced and metastatic prostate cancer and is an important neoadjuvant before radiotherapy. We evaluated 3.0 T dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI in monitoring ADT response. Twenty-three consecutive patients with prostate cancer treated by primary ADT were included. Imaging was performed at baseline and 3 months posttreatment with ADT. After 3 months therapy there was a significant reduction in all dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters measured in tumor regions of interest (K(trans), k(ep), v(p), IAUGC-90); P < 0.001. Areas of normal-appearing peripheral zone showed no significant change; P = 0.285-0.879. Post-ADT, there was no significant change in apparent diffusion coefficient values in tumors, whilst apparent diffusion coefficient values significantly decreased in areas of normal-appearing peripheral zone, from 1.786 × 10(-3) mm(2) /s to 1.561 × 10(-3) mm(2) /s; P = 0.007. As expected the median Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) significantly reduced from 30 ng/mL to 1.5 ng/mL posttreatment, and median prostate volume dropped from 47.6 cm(3) to 24.9 cm(3) ; P < 0.001. These results suggest that dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted MRI offer different information but that both could prove useful adjuncts to the anatomical information provided by T2-weighted imaging. dynamic contrast-enhanced as a marker of angiogenesis may help demonstrate ADT resistance and diffusion-weighted imaging may be more accurate in determining presence of tumor cell death versus residual tumor.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22135228     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.23062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  30 in total

1.  A comparison of two methods for estimating DCE-MRI parameters via individual and cohort based AIFs in prostate cancer: a step towards practical implementation.

Authors:  Andriy Fedorov; Jacob Fluckiger; Gregory D Ayers; Xia Li; Sandeep N Gupta; Clare Tempany; Robert Mulkern; Thomas E Yankeelov; Fiona M Fennessy
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Quantitative effects of acquisition duration and temporal resolution on the measurement accuracy of prostate dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data: a phantom study.

Authors:  Silvin Paul Knight; Jacinta Elizabeth Browne; James Frances Mary Meaney; Andrew John Fagan
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 3.  Imaging and evaluation of patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marc A Bjurlin; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Luis S Beltran; Roy A Raad; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Diffusion-weighted MRI in early assessment of tumour response to radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  L Liu; N Wu; H Ouyang; J-R Dai; W-H Wang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer clinical trials: potential roles and possible pitfalls.

Authors:  Fiona M Fennessy; Rana R McKay; Clair J Beard; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Clare M Tempany
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

6.  Prostate Cancer: assessing the effects of androgen-deprivation therapy using quantitative diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Andreas M Hötker; Yousef Mazaheri; Junting Zheng; Chaya S Moskowitz; Joshua Berkowitz; Joshua E Lantos; Xin Pei; Michael J Zelefsky; Hedvig Hricak; Oguz Akin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Arguments against using an abbreviated or biparametric prostate MRI protocol.

Authors:  Felipe B Franco; Fiona M Fennessy
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-12

8.  Prostate magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients treated for testosterone deficiency while on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Takeshi Hashimoto; Krishnan Rahul; Toshikazu Takeda; Nicole Benfante; John P Mulhall; Hedvig Hricak; James A Eastham; Hebert Alberto Vargas
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 9.  Functional MR Imaging Techniques in Oncology in the Era of Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Matthias R Benz; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Evis Sala
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 2.266

10.  Multiparametric prostate MR imaging with T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences: are all pulse sequences necessary to detect locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy?

Authors:  Olivio F Donati; Sung Il Jung; Hebert Alberto Vargas; David H Gultekin; Junting Zheng; Chaya S Moskowitz; Hedvig Hricak; Michael J Zelefsky; Oguz Akin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.