OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether low knee confidence at baseline is associated with poor baseline-to-3-year physical function outcome in the Osteoarthritis Initiative. METHODS: Knee confidence was assessed using an item from the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score instrument. Physical function was assessed using self-report measures (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC] function score and Short Form 12 physical component scale) and performance-based measures (20-meter walk and chair stand test). Poor function outcome was defined as moving into a worse function group or remaining in the 2 worst function groups between baseline and 3 years. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between baseline knee confidence level and poor baseline-to-3-year function outcome, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: The sample included 3,975 men and women with or at high risk of developing osteoarthritis of the knee, of whom 37-53% had poor baseline-to-3-year function outcome. For both self-report measures, increasingly worse knee confidence was associated with a greater risk of poor function outcome, and trend tests supported a graded response (e.g., the adjusted odds ratios [95% confidence intervals] for the WOMAC function score for worsening confidence categories were 1.26 [1.07-1.49], 1.43 [1.16-1.77], and 2.05 [1.49-2.82], P for trend <0.0001). Similar associations between confidence and performance-based function outcome were observed, but statistical significance did not persist in adjusted analyses. Factors independently associated with poor function outcome for all 4 outcome measures were depressive symptoms, comorbidity, body mass index, and joint space narrowing. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that worse knee confidence at baseline is independently associated with greater risk of poor function outcome by self-report measures, with evidence of a graded response; the relationship with performance measures is not significant in fully adjusted models.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether low knee confidence at baseline is associated with poor baseline-to-3-year physical function outcome in the Osteoarthritis Initiative. METHODS: Knee confidence was assessed using an item from the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score instrument. Physical function was assessed using self-report measures (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC] function score and Short Form 12 physical component scale) and performance-based measures (20-meter walk and chair stand test). Poor function outcome was defined as moving into a worse function group or remaining in the 2 worst function groups between baseline and 3 years. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between baseline knee confidence level and poor baseline-to-3-year function outcome, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: The sample included 3,975 men and women with or at high risk of developing osteoarthritis of the knee, of whom 37-53% had poor baseline-to-3-year function outcome. For both self-report measures, increasingly worse knee confidence was associated with a greater risk of poor function outcome, and trend tests supported a graded response (e.g., the adjusted odds ratios [95% confidence intervals] for the WOMAC function score for worsening confidence categories were 1.26 [1.07-1.49], 1.43 [1.16-1.77], and 2.05 [1.49-2.82], P for trend <0.0001). Similar associations between confidence and performance-based function outcome were observed, but statistical significance did not persist in adjusted analyses. Factors independently associated with poor function outcome for all 4 outcome measures were depressive symptoms, comorbidity, body mass index, and joint space narrowing. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that worse knee confidence at baseline is independently associated with greater risk of poor function outcome by self-report measures, with evidence of a graded response; the relationship with performance measures is not significant in fully adjusted models.
Authors: Matthew S Harkey; Lori Lyn Price; Timothy E McAlindon; Julie E Davis; Alina C Stout; Bing Lu; Ming Zhang; Charles B Eaton; Mary F Barbe; Grace H Lo; Jeffrey B Driban Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Jasmijn F M Holla; Diana C Sanchez-Ramirez; Marike van der Leeden; Johannes C F Ket; Leo D Roorda; Willem F Lems; Martijn P M Steultjens; Joost Dekker Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2014-05-20
Authors: Michael C Nevitt; Irina Tolstykh; Najia Shakoor; Uyen-Sa D T Nguyen; Neil A Segal; Cora Lewis; David T Felson Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Brian Pietrosimone; Brittney A Luc; Austin Duncan; Susan A Saliba; Joseph M Hart; Christopher D Ingersoll Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2017-06-02 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Leena Sharma; Joan S Chmiel; Orit Almagor; Kirsten Moisio; Alison H Chang; Laura Belisle; Yunhui Zhang; Karen W Hayes Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: A H Chang; J S Chmiel; O Almagor; K W Hayes; A Guermazi; P V Prasad; K C Moisio; Y Zhang; J Szymaszek; L Sharma Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2019-02-28 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Mackenzie M Herzog; Jeffrey B Driban; Nicole M Cattano; Kenneth L Cameron; Timothy W Tourville; Stephen W Marshall; Brian Pietrosimone Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Leena Sharma; Kent Kwoh; Jungwha Julia Lee; Jane Cauley; Rebecca Jackson; Marc Hochberg; Alison H Chang; Charles Eaton; Michael Nevitt; Jing Song; Orit Almagor; Joan S Chmiel Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2019-06-26 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Carmelita J Colbert; Orit Almagor; Joan S Chmiel; Jing Song; Dorothy Dunlop; Karen W Hayes; Leena Sharma Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 4.794