Literature DB >> 22133876

Oncogenic stress sensitizes murine cancers to hypomorphic suppression of ATR.

David W Schoppy1, Ryan L Ragland, Oren Gilad, Nishita Shastri, Ashley A Peters, Matilde Murga, Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo, J Alan Diehl, Eric J Brown.   

Abstract

Oncogenic Ras and p53 loss-of-function mutations are common in many advanced sporadic malignancies and together predict a limited responsiveness to conventional chemotherapy. Notably, studies in cultured cells have indicated that each of these genetic alterations creates a selective sensitivity to ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) pathway inhibition. Here, we describe a genetic system to conditionally reduce ATR expression to 10% of normal levels in adult mice to compare the impact of this suppression on normal tissues and cancers in vivo. Hypomorphic suppression of ATR minimally affected normal bone marrow and intestinal homeostasis, indicating that this level of ATR expression was sufficient for highly proliferative adult tissues. In contrast, hypomorphic ATR reduction potently inhibited the growth of both p53-deficient fibrosarcomas expressing H-rasG12V and acute myeloid leukemias (AMLs) driven by MLL-ENL and N-rasG12D. Notably, DNA damage increased in a greater-than-additive fashion upon combining ATR suppression with oncogenic stress (H-rasG12V, K-rasG12D, or c-Myc overexpression), indicating that this cooperative genome-destabilizing interaction may contribute to tumor selectivity in vivo. This toxic interaction between ATR suppression and oncogenic stress occurred without regard to p53 status. These studies define a level of ATR pathway inhibition in which the growth of malignancies harboring oncogenic mutations can be suppressed with minimal impact on normal tissue homeostasis, highlighting ATR inhibition as a promising therapeutic strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22133876      PMCID: PMC3248295          DOI: 10.1172/JCI58928

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Invest        ISSN: 0021-9738            Impact factor:   14.808


  64 in total

1.  ATR inhibition selectively sensitizes G1 checkpoint-deficient cells to lethal premature chromatin condensation.

Authors:  P Nghiem; P K Park; Y Kim ; C Vaziri; S L Schreiber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-31       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  ATR is not required for p53 activation but synergizes with p53 in the replication checkpoint.

Authors:  Paul Nghiem; Peter K Park; Yong-son Kim Ys; Bimal N Desai; Stuart L Schreiber
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Targeted disruption of the cell-cycle checkpoint gene ATR leads to early embryonic lethality in mice.

Authors:  A de Klein; M Muijtjens; R van Os; Y Verhoeven; B Smit; A M Carr; A R Lehmann; J H Hoeijmakers
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-04-20       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Somatic mutations in the DNA damage-response genes ATR and CHK1 in sporadic stomach tumors with microsatellite instability.

Authors:  A Menoyo; H Alazzouzi; E Espín; M Armengol; H Yamamoto; S Schwartz
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Aberrant cell cycle checkpoint function and early embryonic death in Chk1(-/-) mice.

Authors:  H Takai; K Tominaga; N Motoyama; Y A Minamishima; H Nagahama; T Tsukiyama; K Ikeda; K Nakayama; M Nakanishi; K Nakayama
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Chk1 is an essential kinase that is regulated by Atr and required for the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  Q Liu; S Guntuku; X S Cui; S Matsuoka; D Cortez; K Tamai; G Luo; S Carattini-Rivera; F DeMayo; A Bradley; L A Donehower; S J Elledge
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Efficacy of CHK inhibitors as single agents in MYC-driven lymphoma cells.

Authors:  P T Ferrao; E P Bukczynska; R W Johnstone; G A McArthur
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  ATR disruption leads to chromosomal fragmentation and early embryonic lethality.

Authors:  E J Brown; D Baltimore
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Inhibition of Chk1-dependent G2 DNA damage checkpoint radiosensitizes p53 mutant human cells.

Authors:  K Koniaras; A R Cuddihy; H Christopoulos; A Hogg; M J O'Connell
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2001-11-08       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  Tissue regenerative delays and synthetic lethality in adult mice after combined deletion of Atr and Trp53.

Authors:  Yaroslava Ruzankina; David W Schoppy; Amma Asare; Carolyn E Clark; Robert H Vonderheide; Eric J Brown
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-08-30       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  89 in total

1.  ATR phosphorylates SMARCAL1 to prevent replication fork collapse.

Authors:  Frank B Couch; Carol E Bansbach; Robert Driscoll; Jessica W Luzwick; Gloria G Glick; Rémy Bétous; Clinton M Carroll; Sung Yun Jung; Jun Qin; Karlene A Cimprich; David Cortez
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 2.  Mechanisms of Oncogene-Induced Replication Stress: Jigsaw Falling into Place.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kotsantis; Eva Petermann; Simon J Boulton
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 39.397

3.  The Mre11 complex suppresses oncogene-driven breast tumorigenesis and metastasis.

Authors:  Gaorav P Gupta; Katelynd Vanness; Afsar Barlas; Katia O Manova-Todorova; Yong H Wen; John H J Petrini
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  The cancer genome: from structure to function.

Authors:  Ad Geurts van Kessel
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 6.730

Review 5.  Exploiting replicative stress to treat cancer.

Authors:  Matthias Dobbelstein; Claus Storgaard Sørensen
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 84.694

6.  Chk'ing p53-deficient breast cancers.

Authors:  David W Schoppy; Eric J Brown
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  ATR Plays a Direct Antiapoptotic Role at Mitochondria, which Is Regulated by Prolyl Isomerase Pin1.

Authors:  Benjamin A Hilton; Zhengke Li; Phillip R Musich; Hui Wang; Brian M Cartwright; Moises Serrano; Xiao Zhen Zhou; Kun Ping Lu; Yue Zou
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  Wild-type H- and N-Ras promote mutant K-Ras-driven tumorigenesis by modulating the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Elda Grabocka; Yuliya Pylayeva-Gupta; Mathew J K Jones; Veronica Lubkov; Eyoel Yemanaberhan; Laura Taylor; Hao Hsuan Jeng; Dafna Bar-Sagi
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 31.743

9.  HUS1 regulates in vivo responses to genotoxic chemotherapies.

Authors:  G Balmus; P X Lim; A Oswald; K R Hume; A Cassano; J Pierre; A Hill; W Huang; A August; T Stokol; T Southard; R S Weiss
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 10.  Perspectives on the combination of radiotherapy and targeted therapy with DNA repair inhibitors in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Shih-Hung Yang; Ting-Chun Kuo; Hsu Wu; Jhe-Cyuan Guo; Chiun Hsu; Chih-Hung Hsu; Yu-Wen Tien; Kun-Huei Yeh; Ann-Lii Cheng; Sung-Hsin Kuo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.