Literature DB >> 22446183

Chk'ing p53-deficient breast cancers.

David W Schoppy1, Eric J Brown.   

Abstract

Loss or functional impairment of p53 occurs in many human cancers, and its absence is often associated with a poor response to conventional chemotherapy. Hence, much effort is currently devoted to developing novel treatments for p53-deficient malignancies. One approach is to target pathways that are selectively required for the survival of p53-deficient cancer cells, thus exploiting a synthetic lethal interaction. Previous studies have demonstrated that inhibition of the ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) and checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) pathway in p53-deficient cells can induce such a synthetic lethal outcome. In this issue of the JCI, Ma et al. take these findings a step closer to the clinic by demonstrating that highly specific inhibitors of Chk1 synergize with chemotherapy to stem progression of p53-deficient triple-negative breast cancers in a xenotransplant model of this disease. Together with other recent studies, this report highlights the promise of ATR and Chk1 inhibitors in targeted cancer treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22446183      PMCID: PMC3314482          DOI: 10.1172/JCI63205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Invest        ISSN: 0021-9738            Impact factor:   14.808


  22 in total

1.  ATR inhibition selectively sensitizes G1 checkpoint-deficient cells to lethal premature chromatin condensation.

Authors:  P Nghiem; P K Park; Y Kim ; C Vaziri; S L Schreiber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-31       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Targeting the checkpoint kinases: chemosensitization versus chemoprotection.

Authors:  Bin-Bing S Zhou; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  p53-deficient cells rely on ATM- and ATR-mediated checkpoint signaling through the p38MAPK/MK2 pathway for survival after DNA damage.

Authors:  H Christian Reinhardt; Aaron S Aslanian; Jacqueline A Lees; Michael B Yaffe
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 31.743

4.  Activation of the DNA damage checkpoint and genomic instability in human precancerous lesions.

Authors:  Vassilis G Gorgoulis; Leandros-Vassilios F Vassiliou; Panagiotis Karakaidos; Panayotis Zacharatos; Athanassios Kotsinas; Triantafillos Liloglou; Monica Venere; Richard A Ditullio; Nikolaos G Kastrinakis; Brynn Levy; Dimitris Kletsas; Akihiro Yoneta; Meenhard Herlyn; Christos Kittas; Thanos D Halazonetis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Jirina Bartkova; Zuzana Horejsí; Karen Koed; Alwin Krämer; Frederic Tort; Karsten Zieger; Per Guldberg; Maxwell Sehested; Jahn M Nesland; Claudia Lukas; Torben Ørntoft; Jiri Lukas; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  ATR disruption leads to chromosomal fragmentation and early embryonic lethality.

Authors:  E J Brown; D Baltimore
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  UCN-01: a potent abrogator of G2 checkpoint function in cancer cells with disrupted p53.

Authors:  Q Wang; S Fan; A Eastman; P J Worland; E A Sausville; P M O'Connor
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1996-07-17       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Inhibition of Chk1-dependent G2 DNA damage checkpoint radiosensitizes p53 mutant human cells.

Authors:  K Koniaras; A R Cuddihy; H Christopoulos; A Hogg; M J O'Connell
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2001-11-08       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  Differential sensitivity of p53(-) and p53(+) cells to caffeine-induced radiosensitization and override of G2 delay.

Authors:  S N Powell; J S DeFrank; P Connell; M Eogan; F Preffer; D Dombkowski; W Tang; S Friend
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1995-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Abrogation of the G2 checkpoint results in differential radiosensitization of G1 checkpoint-deficient and G1 checkpoint-competent cells.

Authors:  K J Russell; L W Wiens; G W Demers; D A Galloway; S E Plon; M Groudine
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1995-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  5 in total

1.  Targeting the ATR/CHK1 Axis with PARP Inhibition Results in Tumor Regression in BRCA-Mutant Ovarian Cancer Models.

Authors:  Hyoung Kim; Erin George; Ryan Ragland; Stavros Rafail; Rugang Zhang; Clemens Krepler; Mark Morgan; Meenhard Herlyn; Eric Brown; Fiona Simpkins
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Depletion of ATR selectively sensitizes ATM-deficient human mammary epithelial cells to ionizing radiation and DNA-damaging agents.

Authors:  Yuxia Cui; Stela S Palii; Cynthia L Innes; Richard S Paules
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

3.  Checkpoint Kinase 1 Expression Predicts Poor Prognosis in Nigerian Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Henry Okuchukwu Ebili; Victoria O Iyawe; Kikelomo Rachel Adeleke; Babatunde Abayomi Salami; Adekunbiola Aina Banjo; Chris Nolan; Emad Rakha; Ian Ellis; Andrew Green; Ayodeji Olayinka Johnson Agboola
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.074

4.  Hormone receptor status (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor), human epidermal growth factor-2 and p53 in South Indian breast cancer patients: A tertiary care center experience.

Authors:  Rashmi Patnayak; Amitabh Jena; Nandyala Rukmangadha; Amit Kumar Chowhan; K Sambasivaiah; Bobbit Venkatesh Phaneendra; Mandyam Kumaraswamy Reddy
Journal:  Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

5.  Targeting Sphingosine Kinase Isoforms Effectively Reduces Growth and Survival of Neoplastic Mast Cells With D816V-KIT.

Authors:  Geethani Bandara; Rosa Muñoz-Cano; Araceli Tobío; Yuzhi Yin; Hirsh D Komarow; Avanti Desai; Dean D Metcalfe; Ana Olivera
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 7.561

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.