Literature DB >> 22133063

Evaluation of long-term patient satisfaction and experience with the Baha® bone conduction implant.

Jacob Rasmussen1, Steen Østergaard Olsen, Lars Holme Nielsen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate long-term patient satisfaction with bone-anchored hearing aids (the Baha®, now referred to by Cochlear as a 'bone conduction implant') in our hospital clinic spanning the eighteen-year period from the inception of our Baha program. The researchers further wished to analyse the various factors leading to patient satisfaction/dissatisfaction with their Baha. We developed a new questionnaire to obtain a comprehensive impression of individual patient practices, general satisfaction, and experiences with their Baha in respect to time spent using Baha, sound quality, annoyance from noise disturbance, ease of communication, cosmetic appearance, and satisfaction with the Baha amongst patient relatives, an aspect not previously investigated.
DESIGN: The study design was retrospective and executed as a postal questionnaire. The questionnaire was developed by the authors of this paper. STUDY SAMPLE: Patients operated on for a Baha at our hospital from 1989 to 2007.
RESULTS: The response rate was 92.4%. Eighty-six percent were satisfied or very satisfied with their Baha. Ninety-one percent of respondents could communicate using their Baha in a one-on-one conversational setting. A primary factor leading to dissatisfaction, experienced by 70% of responding patients, was annoyance from wind noise.
CONCLUSIONS: Baha was found to yield good overall patient satisfaction over the long-term, and it was possible to identify specific factors attributing to satisfaction/dissatisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22133063     DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2011.635315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  5 in total

1.  Influence of directionality and maximal power output on speech understanding with bone anchored hearing implants in single sided deafness.

Authors:  Silvia Krempaska; Juraj Koval; Christoph Schmid; Flurin Pfiffner; Anja Kurz; Martin Kompis
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  A multicenter study on objective and subjective benefits with a transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid device: first Nordic results.

Authors:  Dan Dupont Hougaard; Soren Kjaergaard Boldsen; Anne Marie Jensen; Soren Hansen; Per Cayé Thomassen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Bone-anchored hearing aids in conductive and mixed hearing losses: why do patients reject them?

Authors:  Richard T K Siau; Baljeet Dhillon; Derrick Siau; Kevin M J Green
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  First experience in Italy with a new transcutaneous bone conduction implant.

Authors:  P Marsella; A Scorpecci; G Dalmasso; C Pacifico
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.124

5.  Clinical Outcomes of Soft Tissue Preservation Surgery With Hydroxyapatite-Coated Abutments Compared to Traditional Percutaneous Bone Conduction Hearing Implant Surgery-A Pragmatic Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  M van Hoof; S Wigren; J Ivarsson Blechert; M A Joore; D J M Mateijsen; S J H Bom; J Stalfors; Måns Eeg-Olofsson; O Deguine; A J M van der Rijt; M C Flynn; J Marco Algarra; R J Stokroos
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2020-03-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.