| Literature DB >> 22132863 |
Jihed Boubaker1, Hedi Ben Mansour, Kamel Ghedira, Leila Chekir-Ghedira.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Three extracts were prepared from the leaves of Accacia salicina; ethyl acetate (EA), chloroform (Chl) and petroleum ether (PE) extracts and was designed to examine antimutagenic, antioxidant potenty and oxidative DNA damage protecting activity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22132863 PMCID: PMC3267653 DOI: 10.1186/1476-0711-10-37
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob ISSN: 1476-0711 Impact factor: 3.944
Phytochemical screening of extracts from Accacia salicina
| PE extract | Chl extract | EA extract | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sterols | ++++ | ++ | - |
| Flavonoids | - | - | +++ |
| Tanins | - | - | +++ |
| Coumarins | - | ++ | ++ |
| polyphenols | - | ++ | ++ |
| Yield (%) | 1.90 | 3.24 | 2.31 |
- = not detectable; + = low quantitiy; ++ = average quantitiy +++ = high quantitiy ++++ = very high quantitiy
Quantitative phytochemical screening of extracts from Accacia salicina leaves
| Extract content (%) | PE extract | Chl extract | EA extract |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tanins(%) | - | - | 1.9 ± 0.01 |
| Flavonoid(%) | - | - | 2.2 ± 0.01 |
| Polyphenols (%) | - | 3.62 ± 0.008 | 3. 31 ± 012 |
| sterols(%) | 12.5 ± 0.02 | 5 ± 0.007 | 2 ± 0.01 |
(results are represented by the means ± SD of three experiments)
TEAC of ABTS radical formation by Acaccia salicina leaf extracts
| Extracts b | Concentrations | Inhibition percentage a (%) | IC50 | TEAC values mM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.05 | 1.86 ± 1.11 | |||
| 0.5 | 10. 5 ± 2.23 | |||
| 2.5 | 16.7 ± 2.36 | - | 0.24 ± .008 | |
| 4.5 | 28 ± 1.11 | |||
| 7.5 | 41.5* ± 2.18 | |||
| 0.05 | 2.52 ± 2.03 | |||
| 0.5 | 19.2 ± 2.53 | |||
| 2.5 | 57.8* ± 2.81 | |||
| 4.5 | 72.20* ± 3.82 | |||
| 7.5 | 91* ± 1.65 | |||
| 0.05 | 5.52 ± 2.06 | |||
| 0.5 | 28 ± 1.68 | |||
| 2.5 | 90. 2* ± 2. 12 | |||
| 4.5 | 99.28* ± 1.92 | |||
| 7.5 | 100 | |||
| TRolox c | ||||
a Inhibition of absorbance at 734 nm relative to that of standart ABTS solution
b Values were expressed as means ± standard deviation of three experiments
c positive control
* P < 0.05 compared to negative control without the tested extract by ANOVA followed by student test.
Figure 1Electrophoretic pattern of DNA after UV photolysis of H. A : DNA, B : DNA + hydrogen peroxide + UV, C: DNA + PE extract (25 μg/assay) + H2O2, D : DNA + PE extract (10 μg/assay) + UV+ H2O2 , E : DNA + PE extract (5 μg/assay) + UV+ H2O2, F : DNA + Chl extract (25 μg/assay) + UV+ H2O2, G : DNA + Chl extract (10 μg/assay) + UV+ H2O2, H : DNA + Chl extract (5 μg/assay) + UV + H2O2, I : DNA + EA extract (25 μg/assay) + UV+ H2O2, J : DNA + EA extract (10 μg/assay) + UV+ H2O2 , K : DNA + EA extract (5 μg/assay) + UV+ H2O2. I: supercoiled form (Sc DNA), II: circular-relaxed form (Oc DNA), III: linear form (Lin DNA)
Mutagenic effect of different Accacia salicina leaf extracts in S.typhimurium TA104 and TA102 assay systems in the presence and absence of an exogenous metabolic activation system (S9)
| Extracts | Doses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -S9 | +S 9 | -S9 | +S9 | ||
| Spontaneous | - | 312 ± 8 | 335 ± 11 | 244 ± 18 | 265 ± 25 |
| PC | - | 2144 ± 23 | 1149 ± 15 | 1721 ± 24 | 652 ± 10 |
| Petroleum ether extract | 25 | 352 ± 21 | 375 ± 18 | 289 ± 11 | 294 ± 14 |
| 10 | 348 ± 14 | 369 ± 17 | 260 ± 14 | 284 ± 15 | |
| Chloroform extract | 5 | 336 ± 16 | 361 ± 19 | 249 ± 13 | 270 ± 17 |
| 25 | 336 ± 10 | 359 ± 21 | 299 ± 13 | 304 ± 12 | |
| 10 | 328 ± 11 | 353 ± 13 | 249 ± 13 | 289 ± 15 | |
| Ethyl Acetate extract | 5 | 318 ± 10 | 344 ± 9 | 242 ± 15 | 275 ± 19 |
| 25 | 381 ± 15 | 363 ± 16 | 254 ± 22 | 304 ± 14 | |
| 10 | 333 ± 17 | 356 ± 20 | 246 ± 12 | 294 ± 11 | |
| 5 | 322 ± 25 | 340 ± 09 | 242 ± 18 | 272 ± 19 | |
Positive control (PC): S. typhimurium TA104/-S9, MMS (325 μg/plate); S. typhimurium TA104/+S9, 2-AA (5 μg/plate); S. typhimurium TA102/-S9, MMS (130 μg/plate); S. typhimurium TA102/+S9, 2 AA (10 μg/plate).
MMS: Methylmethane sulfonate, 2-AA: 2-amino anthracene
Effect of different extracts from Accacia salicina leaves on the mutagenicity induced by MMS in Salmonella thyphimurium TA104 and TA102 assay systems without S9
| Extracts | Doses | Nb revertants | % inhibition of mutagenesis | Nb revertants | % inhibition mutagenesis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spontaneous | - | - | |||
| PC | - | - | |||
| Petroleum ether extract | 1454 ± 95 | 1239 ± 73 | |||
| 1712 ± 45 | 1265 ± 42 | ||||
| 2002 ± 43 | 7.75 | 1325 ± 56 | 2.63 | ||
| Chloroform extract | 965 ± 99 | 996 ± 68 | |||
| 1135 ± 64 | 1016 ± 82 | ||||
| 1266 ± 59 | 1099 ± 47 | ||||
| Ethyl acetate extract | 1328 ± 58 | 1109 ± 73 | |||
| 1475 ± 98 | 1195 ± 42 | ||||
| 1813 ± 54 | 18.06 | 1235 ± 56 | |||
Positive control (PC): S. typhimurium TA104/-S9, MMS (325 μg/plate); S. typhimurium TA102/-S9, MMS (130 μg/plate). MMS: Methylmethane sulfonate, 2-AA: 2-amino anthracene.
Effect of different extracts from Accacia salicina leaves on the mutagenicity induced by 2-AA in Salmonella thyphimurium TA104 and TA102 assay systems in the presence of S9
| Extracts | TA104 | TA 102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Doses (μg/plate) | Nb revertants | % inhibition of mutagenesis | Nb revertants | % inhibition of mutagenesis | |
| Spontaneous | - | - | |||
| PC | - | - | |||
| Petroleum ether extract | 925 ± 46 | 520 ± 11 | |||
| 934 ± 14 | 582 ± 8 | 16.78 | |||
| Chloroform extract | 1105 ± 28 | 5.4 | - | ||
| 638 ± 47 | 281 ± 16 | ||||
| 764 ± 38 | 426 ± 17 | ||||
| Ethyl acetate extract | 881 ± 22 | 506 ± 7 | |||
| 847 ± 34 | 476 ± 5 | ||||
| 865 ± 52 | 584 ± 17 | 16.3 | |||
| 1077 ± 19 | 8.84 | 652 ± 6 | - | ||