Literature DB >> 22131389

Monitoring of ovarian activity by measurement of urinary excretion rates of estrone glucuronide and pregnanediol glucuronide using the Ovarian Monitor, Part II: reliability of home testing.

Leonard F Blackwell1, Pilar Vigil, Barbara Gross, Catherine d'Arcangues, Delwyn G Cooke, James B Brown.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The UNDP/WHO/World Bank/Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (Geneva) set up a study to determine whether it is feasible for women to monitor their ovarian activity reliably by home testing. Daily self-monitoring of urinary hormone metabolites for menstrual cycle assessment was evaluated by comparison of results obtained with the Home Ovarian Monitor by untrained users both at home and in study centres.
METHODS: Women collected daily data for urinary estrone glucuronide (E1G) and pregnanediol glucuronide (PdG) for two cycles, then the procedure was repeated in the women's local centre (in Chile, Australia or New Zealand) giving a total of 113 duplicate cycles. The tests were performed without the benefit of replicates or quality controls. The home and centre cycles were normalized and compared to identify assay errors, and the resulting home and centre menstrual cycle profiles were averaged.
RESULTS: Reliable mean cycle profiles were obtained with the home and centre excretion rates agreeing to within 36 ± 21 nmol/24 h for E1G and 0.77 ± 0.28 µmol/24 h for baseline PdG values (1-5 µmol/24 h). The cycles had a mean length of 28.1 ± 3.1 days (n = 112; 5th and 95th percentiles: 24 and 35 days, respectively), a mean follicular phase of 14.8 ± 3.1 days (n = 107; 5th and 95th percentiles: 11 and 21 days) and a mean luteal phase length of 13.3 ± 1.5 days (n = 106; 5th and 95th percentiles: 11 and 17 days), calculated from the day of the LH peak.
CONCLUSIONS: The study confirmed that the Ovarian Monitor pre-coated assay tubes worked well even in the hands of lay users, without standard curves, quality controls or replicates. Point-of-care monitoring to give reliable fertility data is feasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22131389     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  12 in total

1.  Self-Monitoring of Fertility Hormones: A New Era for Natural Family Planning?

Authors:  Leonard Blackwell; Delwyn Cooke; Simon Brown
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2018-03-28

2.  Dissociation between Cervical Mucus and Urinary Hormones during the Postpartum Return of Fertility in Breastfeeding Women.

Authors:  Thomas Bouchard; Len Blackwell; Simon Brown; Richard Fehring; Suzanne Parenteau-Carreau
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2018-11-30

Review 3.  Determining menstrual phase in human biobehavioral research: A review with recommendations.

Authors:  Alicia M Allen; Aimee L McRae-Clark; Samantha Carlson; Michael E Saladin; Kevin M Gray; Cora Lee Wetherington; Sherry A McKee; Sharon S Allen
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  Sex Differences in Renal Proximal Tubular Cell Homeostasis.

Authors:  Thomas Seppi; Sinikka Prajczer; Maria-Magdalena Dörler; Oliver Eiter; Daniel Hekl; Meinhard Nevinny-Stickel; Iraida Skvortsova; Gerhard Gstraunthaler; Peter Lukas; Judith Lechner
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  Assessment of anovulation in eumenorrheic women: comparison of ovulation detection algorithms.

Authors:  Kristine E Lynch; Sunni L Mumford; Karen C Schliep; Brian W Whitcomb; Shvetha M Zarek; Anna Z Pollack; Elizabeth R Bertone-Johnson; Michelle Danaher; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Audrey J Gaskins; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Modern fertility awareness methods: wrist wearables capture the changes in temperature associated with the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Mohaned Shilaih; Brianna M Goodale; Lisa Falco; Florian Kübler; Valerie De Clerck; Brigitte Leeners
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Pilot observational prospective cohort study on the use of a novel home-based urinary pregnanediol 3-glucuronide (PDG) test to confirm ovulation when used as adjunct to fertility awareness methods (FAMs) stage 1.

Authors:  Rene Leiva; Marie McNamara-Kilian; Helen Niezgoda; René Ecochard; Thomas Bouchard
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Towards the Clinical Evaluation of the Luteal Phase in Fertile Women: A Preliminary Study of Normative Urinary Hormone Profiles.

Authors:  María Elena Alliende; José Antonio Arraztoa; Ulises Guajardo; Fernando Mellado
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-05-31

Review 9.  The Use of Estrone-3-Glucuronide and Pregnanediol-3-Glucuronide Excretion Rates to Navigate the Continuum of Ovarian Activity.

Authors:  Leonard F Blackwell; Delwyn G Cooke; Simon Brown
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-05-31

10.  A progesterone biosensor derived from microbial screening.

Authors:  Chloé Grazon; R C Baer; Uroš Kuzmanović; Thuy Nguyen; Mingfu Chen; Marjon Zamani; Margaret Chern; Patricia Aquino; Xiaoman Zhang; Sébastien Lecommandoux; Andy Fan; Mario Cabodi; Catherine Klapperich; Mark W Grinstaff; Allison M Dennis; James E Galagan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.