Literature DB >> 22130775

Common deficiencies with bioequivalence submissions in abbreviated new drug applications assessed by FDA.

Qing Liu1, Barbara M Davit, Svetlana A Cherstniakova, Suman Dandamudi, Johnetta F Walters, Christina H Lee, Kimberly W Raines, Ke Ren, Leeh N Williamson, Dale P Conner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A generic product must meet the standards established by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to be approved for marketing in the USA. FDA approves a generic product for marketing if it is proved to be therapeutically equivalent to the reference product. Bioequivalence (BE) between a proposed generic product and its corresponding reference product is one of the major components of therapeutic equivalence. These approvals may be delayed if the BE portion of the submission is determined to be deficient. Many of these BE deficiencies recur commonly and can be avoided.
METHOD: We conducted a survey of the BE submissions to abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) over years 2001 to 2008 to identify the most commonly occurring BE deficiencies.
RESULTS: Recurring deficiencies are found in a majority of the ANDAs reviewed by FDA's Division of Bioequivalence. The most common deficiencies were the two deficiencies related to dissolution (method and specifications) found in 23.3% of the applications and analytical method validation and/or report found in 16.5% of the applications. The approval of generic drugs would be greatly accelerated if these deficiencies could be avoided.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22130775      PMCID: PMC3291193          DOI: 10.1208/s12248-011-9312-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  5 in total

1.  Dissolution Similarity Requirements: How Similar or Dissimilar Are the Global Regulatory Expectations?

Authors:  Dorys Argelia Diaz; Stephen T Colgan; Connie S Langer; Nagesh T Bandi; Michael D Likar; Leslie Van Alstine
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 2.  Implementation of a reference-scaled average bioequivalence approach for highly variable generic drug products by the US Food and Drug Administration.

Authors:  Barbara M Davit; Mei-Ling Chen; Dale P Conner; Sam H Haidar; Stephanie Kim; Christina H Lee; Robert A Lionberger; Fairouz T Makhlouf; Patrick E Nwakama; Devvrat T Patel; Donald J Schuirmann; Lawrence X Yu
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Common reasons for "for-cause" inspections in bioequivalence studies submitted to the Food and Drug Administration.

Authors:  Bing V Li; Barbara M Davit; Christina H Lee; Santhosh K Pabba; Chitra Mahadevan; Hoainhon T Caramenico; Sam H Haidar; Aida L Sanchez; Aaron W Sigler; Ethan M Stier; Dale P Conner
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Bioequivalence Common Deficiencies in Generic Products Submitted for Registration to the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA).

Authors:  Lerato Moeti; Madira Litedu; Jacques Joubert
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 1.337

5.  A Phase I, Randomized, Single-Dose Study to Evaluate the Biosimilarity of QL1206 to Denosumab Among Chinese Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Hong Zhang; Min Wu; Xiaoxue Zhu; Cuiyun Li; Xiaojiao Li; Jixuan Sun; Chengjiao Liu; Quan Liu; Wei Wei; Junqi Niu; Yanhua Ding
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 5.810

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.