Literature DB >> 22130212

The challenges to transparency in reporting medical errors.

Zachary R Paterick1, Barbara B Paterick, Blake E Waterhouse, Timothy E Paterick.   

Abstract

In an ideal health care environment, physicians and health care organizations would acknowledge and factually report all medical errors and "near misses" in an effort to improve future patient safety by better identifying systemic safety lapses. Truth must permeate the health care system to achieve the goal of transparency. The Institute of Medicine has estimated that 44,000 to 98,000 patients die each year as a result of medical errors. Improving the reporting of medical errors and near misses is essential for better prevention of medical errors and thus increasing patient safety. Higher rates of reporting can permit identification of the root causes of errors and create improved processes that can significantly reduce errors in future patient care. Multiple barriers exist with respect to reporting medical errors, despite the ethical and various professional, regulatory, and legislative expectations and requirements generating this obligation. As long as physicians perceive that they are at risk for sanctions, malpractice claims, and unpredictable compensation of injured patients as determined by the United States' tort law system, legislative or regulative reform is unlikely to affect the underreporting of medical errors, and patient safety cannot benefit from the lessons derived from past medical errors and near misses. A new infrastructure for creating patient safety systems, as identified in the Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act of 2005 is needed. A patient compensation system guided by an administrative health court that includes some form of no-fault insurance must be studied to identify benefits and risks. Most urgent is the development of a reporting system for medical errors and near misses that is transparent and effectively recognizes the legitimate concerns of physicians and health care providers and improves patient safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 22130212     DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3181be2a88

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Patient Saf        ISSN: 1549-8417            Impact factor:   2.844


  5 in total

Review 1.  Highly reliable procedural teams: the journey to spread the universal protocol in diagnostic imaging.

Authors:  Julie Ross; Debby Wolf; Kimberly Reece
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2014

2.  Perceived versus Observed Patient Safety Measures in a Critical Care Unit from a Teaching Hospital in Southern Colombia.

Authors:  Jorge Hernan Montenegro; Adriana Fernanda Romero; Paola Andrea Tejada; Sandra Ximena Olaya; Andres Mariano Rubiano
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2016-02-18

3.  Morbidity and mortality conferences: Their educational role and why we should be there.

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-11-26

4.  Medication Error Disclosure and Attitudes to Reporting by Healthcare Professionals in a Sub-Saharan African Setting: A Survey in Uganda.

Authors:  Ronald Kiguba; Paul Waako; Helen B Ndagije; Charles Karamagi
Journal:  Drugs Real World Outcomes       Date:  2015-09-01

5.  10,000 Good Catches: Increasing Safety Event Reporting In A Pediatric Health Care System.

Authors:  Kristen M Crandall; Ahmed Almuhanna; Rebecca Cady; Lisbeth Fahey; Tara Taylor Floyd; Debbie Freiburg; Mary Anne Hilliard; Sonal Kalburgi; Nafis I Khan; DiAnthia Patrick; Padmaja Pavuluri; Kelvin Potter; Lisa Scafidi; Laura Sigman; Rahul K Shah
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2018-04-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.