Julie Ross1, Debby Wolf2, Kimberly Reece3. 1. Project Manager for Medical Group Administration for the West Los Angeles Medical Center in CA. julie.b.ross@kp.org. 2. Assistant Medical Center Administrator for the Southern California Permanente Medical Group at the West Los Angeles Medical Center in CA. debby.a.wolf@kp.org. 3. Family Medicine Physician at the West Los Angeles Medical Center in CA. kimberly.c.reece@kp.org.
Abstract
CONTEXT: The Joint Commission’s Universal Protocol has been widely implemented in surgical settings since publication in 2003. The elements improved patient safety in operating rooms, and the same rigor is being applied to procedures occurring in other health care arenas, in particular, diagnostic imaging. OBJECTIVE: In 2011, Kaiser Permanente West Los Angeles’s Diagnostic Imaging Department desired to adapt previous work on Universal Protocol implementation to improve patient safety in interventional radiology and mammography procedures. DESIGN: The teams underwent human factors training and then adapted key interventions used in surgical suites to their workflows. Time-out posters, use of whiteboards, "glitch books," and regular audits provided structure to overcome the risks that human factors present. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Staff and physician perceptions of the teamwork and safety climates in their modalities were measured using the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire at baseline and at 18 months after training. Unusual Occurrence Reports were also reviewed to identify events and near misses that could be prevented. Implementation of key process changes were identified as process measures. RESULTS: Perception of the safety climate improved 25% in interventional radiology and 4.5% in mammography. Perception of the teamwork climate decreased 5.4% in interventional radiology and 16.6% in mammography. Unusual occurrences were underreported at baseline, and there is ongoing reluctance to document near misses. CONCLUSION: This work provides important considerations of the impact of departmental cultures for the implementation of the Universal Protocol in procedural areas. It also reveals unexpected challenges, and requires long-term effort and focus.
CONTEXT: The Joint Commission’s Universal Protocol has been widely implemented in surgical settings since publication in 2003. The elements improved patient safety in operating rooms, and the same rigor is being applied to procedures occurring in other health care arenas, in particular, diagnostic imaging. OBJECTIVE: In 2011, Kaiser Permanente West Los Angeles’s Diagnostic Imaging Department desired to adapt previous work on Universal Protocol implementation to improve patient safety in interventional radiology and mammography procedures. DESIGN: The teams underwent human factors training and then adapted key interventions used in surgical suites to their workflows. Time-out posters, use of whiteboards, "glitch books," and regular audits provided structure to overcome the risks that human factors present. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Staff and physician perceptions of the teamwork and safety climates in their modalities were measured using the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire at baseline and at 18 months after training. Unusual Occurrence Reports were also reviewed to identify events and near misses that could be prevented. Implementation of key process changes were identified as process measures. RESULTS: Perception of the safety climate improved 25% in interventional radiology and 4.5% in mammography. Perception of the teamwork climate decreased 5.4% in interventional radiology and 16.6% in mammography. Unusual occurrences were underreported at baseline, and there is ongoing reluctance to document near misses. CONCLUSION: This work provides important considerations of the impact of departmental cultures for the implementation of the Universal Protocol in procedural areas. It also reveals unexpected challenges, and requires long-term effort and focus.
Authors: Martin A Makary; J Bryan Sexton; Julie A Freischlag; Christine G Holzmueller; E Anne Millman; Lisa Rowen; Peter J Pronovost Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Alex B Haynes; Thomas G Weiser; William R Berry; Stuart R Lipsitz; Abdel-Hadi S Breizat; E Patchen Dellinger; Teodoro Herbosa; Sudhir Joseph; Pascience L Kibatala; Marie Carmela M Lapitan; Alan F Merry; Krishna Moorthy; Richard K Reznick; Bryce Taylor; Atul A Gawande Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-01-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Joanne Timmel; Paula S Kent; Christine G Holzmueller; Lori Paine; Richard D Schulick; Peter J Pronovost Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2010-06
Authors: D R Lewis; R A Bullbulia; P Murphy; A J Jones; F C Smith; R N Baird; P M Lamont Journal: Ann R Coll Surg Engl Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 1.891
Authors: Peter Pronovost; Christine G Holzmueller; Dale M Needham; J Bryan Sexton; Marlene Miller; Sean Berenholtz; Albert W Wu; Trish M Perl; Richard Davis; David Baker; Laura Winner; Laura Morlock Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Karen Mazzocco; Diana B Petitti; Kenneth T Fong; Doug Bonacum; John Brookey; Suzanne Graham; Robert E Lasky; J Bryan Sexton; Eric J Thomas Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2008-09-11 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: John B Sexton; Robert L Helmreich; Torsten B Neilands; Kathy Rowan; Keryn Vella; James Boyden; Peter R Roberts; Eric J Thomas Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2006-04-03 Impact factor: 2.655