Literature DB >> 22130052

Measuring physical activity and sedentary behaviour at work: a review.

Marcelo Castillo-Retamal1, Erica A Hinckson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify methods used to assess physical activity and sedentary behaviour at the workplace and review the validity and reliability of these measures.
METHODS: Databases were searched for relevant published articles including MEDLINE, SPORT Discus, ProQuest and Google Scholar. Keywords used were physical-activity, workplace, sedentary-behaviour, measurement and questionnaire. Studies included were original, written in English, published between 1990 and 2009, and focused on validated physical activity and sedentary behaviour measures at work. Eleven papers were identified in which three used criterion standards, three objective measures, and five subjective measures.
RESULTS: The most common method of data collection was through self-report, surveys or questionnaires. Physical activity measured with motion sensors, ranged from 4,422 to 10,334 steps/day (pedometers) and sedentary time ranged from 1.8 to 6 hours/day (h/d) (accelerometers). Self-report measures provided information relevant to the perception of physical activity at work (∼ 0.5 h/d), sitting time (> 3 h/d) and calculated energy expenditure (< 800 kcal/d).
CONCLUSION: Physical activity levels at work were low while sedentary behaviour was high. This was largely a function of occupation (white-collar vs. blue-collar). None of the studies assessed validity or reliability of measures used however, instruments as assessed by others showed moderate to strong validity and reliability values.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22130052     DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2011-1246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Work        ISSN: 1051-9815


  16 in total

1.  Deviation between self-reported and measured occupational physical activity levels in office employees: effects of age and body composition.

Authors:  Katharina Wick; Oliver Faude; Susanne Schwager; Lukas Zahner; Lars Donath
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Practical guide to measuring physical activity.

Authors:  Louisa G Sylvia; Emily E Bernstein; Jane L Hubbard; Leigh Keating; Ellen J Anderson
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 4.910

Review 3.  Review of self-reported physical activity assessments for pregnancy: summary of the evidence for validity and reliability.

Authors:  Kelly R Evenson; Lisa Chasan-Taber; Danielle Symons Downs; Emily E Pearce
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 3.980

4.  E-health physical activity interventions and moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity levels among working-age women: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Jennifer L Reed; Stephanie A Prince; Christie A Cole; Kara A Nerenberg; Swapnil Hiremath; Heather E Tulloch; J George Fodor; Agnieszka Szczotka; Lisa A McDonnell; Kerri-Anne Mullen; Andrew L Pipe; Robert D Reid
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-01-14

5.  Workplace physical activity interventions and moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity levels among working-age women: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Jennifer L Reed; Stephanie A Prince; Christie A Cole; J George Fodor; Swapnil Hiremath; Kerri-Anne Mullen; Heather E Tulloch; Erica Wright; Robert D Reid
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2014-12-19

6.  Association of Occupational and Leisure-Time Physical Activity with Aerobic Capacity in a Working Population.

Authors:  Jonas Mundwiler; Ulla Schüpbach; Thomas Dieterle; Jörg Daniel Leuppi; Arno Schmidt-Trucksäss; David Paul Wolfer; David Miedinger; Stefanie Brighenti-Zogg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Lower limb blood flow and mean arterial pressure during standing and seated work: Implications for workplace posture recommendations.

Authors:  David M Antle; Lauren Cormier; Megan Findlay; Linda L Miller; Julie N Côté
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2018-03-05

8.  Objectively Measured Total and Occupational Sedentary Time in Three Work Settings.

Authors:  Paula van Dommelen; Jennifer K Coffeng; Hidde P van der Ploeg; Allard J van der Beek; Cécile R L Boot; Ingrid J M Hendriksen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Reliability and validity of two fitness tracker devices in the laboratory and home environment for older community-dwelling people.

Authors:  Elissa Burton; Keith D Hill; Nicola T Lautenschlager; Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani; Gill Lewin; Eileen Boyle; Erin Howie
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.921

10.  Changes in Sitting Time and Sitting Fragmentation after a Workplace Sedentary Behaviour Intervention.

Authors:  Jasmin Hutchinson; Samuel Headley; Tracey Matthews; Greg Spicer; Kristen Dempsey; Sarah Wooley; Xanne Janssen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.