PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of automatic segmentation of atherosclerotic plaque components using solely multicontrast 3D gradient echo (GRE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 15 patients with a history of recent transient ischemic attacks or stroke underwent carotid vessel wall imaging bilaterally with a combination of 2D turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences and 3D GRE sequences. The TSE sequences included T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted scans. The 3D GRE sequences included time-of-flight (TOF), magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo (MP-RAGE), and motion-sensitized driven equilibrium prepared rapid gradient echo (MERGE) scans. From these images, the previously developed morphology-enhanced probabilistic plaque segmentation (MEPPS) algorithm was retrained based solely on the 3D GRE sequences to segment necrotic core (NC), calcification (CA), and loose matrix (LM). Segmentation performance was assessed using a leave-one-out cross-validation approach via comparing the new 3D-MEPPS algorithm to the original MEPPS algorithm that was based on the traditional multicontrast protocol including 2D TSE and TOF sequences. RESULTS: Twenty arteries of 15 subjects were found to exhibit significant plaques within the coverage of all imaging sequences. For these arteries, between new and original MEPPS algorithms, the areas per slice exhibited correlation coefficients of 0.86 for NC, 0.99 for CA, and 0.80 for LM; no significant area bias was observed. CONCLUSION: The combination of 3D imaging sequences (TOF, MP-RAGE, and MERGE) can provide sufficient contrast to distinguish NC, CA, and LM. Automatic segmentation using 3D sequences and traditional multicontrast protocol produced highly similar results.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of automatic segmentation of atherosclerotic plaque components using solely multicontrast 3D gradient echo (GRE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 15 patients with a history of recent transient ischemic attacks or stroke underwent carotid vessel wall imaging bilaterally with a combination of 2D turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences and 3D GRE sequences. The TSE sequences included T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted scans. The 3D GRE sequences included time-of-flight (TOF), magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo (MP-RAGE), and motion-sensitized driven equilibrium prepared rapid gradient echo (MERGE) scans. From these images, the previously developed morphology-enhanced probabilistic plaque segmentation (MEPPS) algorithm was retrained based solely on the 3D GRE sequences to segment necrotic core (NC), calcification (CA), and loose matrix (LM). Segmentation performance was assessed using a leave-one-out cross-validation approach via comparing the new 3D-MEPPS algorithm to the original MEPPS algorithm that was based on the traditional multicontrast protocol including 2D TSE and TOF sequences. RESULTS: Twenty arteries of 15 subjects were found to exhibit significant plaques within the coverage of all imaging sequences. For these arteries, between new and original MEPPS algorithms, the areas per slice exhibited correlation coefficients of 0.86 for NC, 0.99 for CA, and 0.80 for LM; no significant area bias was observed. CONCLUSION: The combination of 3D imaging sequences (TOF, MP-RAGE, and MERGE) can provide sufficient contrast to distinguish NC, CA, and LM. Automatic segmentation using 3D sequences and traditional multicontrast protocol produced highly similar results.
Authors: J M A Hofman; W J Branderhorst; H M M ten Eikelder; V C Cappendijk; S Heeneman; M E Kooi; P A J Hilbers; B M ter Haar Romeny Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Hunter R Underhill; Chun Yuan; Xue-Qiao Zhao; Larry W Kraiss; Dennis L Parker; Tobias Saam; Baocheng Chu; Norihide Takaya; Fei Liu; Nayak L Polissar; Blazej Neradilek; Joel S Raichlen; Valerie A Cain; John C Waterton; Wendy Hamar; Thomas S Hatsukami Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2008-01-18 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Richard Bitar; Alan R Moody; General Leung; Sean Symons; Susan Crisp; Jagdish Butany; Corwyn Rowsell; Alexander Kiss; Andrew Nelson; Robert Maggisano Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Ioannis Koktzoglou; Yiu-Cho Chung; Timothy J Carroll; Orlando P Simonetti; Mark D Morasch; Debiao Li Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Karim Lekadir; Alfiia Galimzianova; Angels Betriu; Maria Del Mar Vila; Laura Igual; Daniel L Rubin; Elvira Fernandez; Petia Radeva; Sandy Napel Journal: IEEE J Biomed Health Inform Date: 2016-11-22 Impact factor: 5.772
Authors: Taku Yoneyama; Jie Sun; Daniel S Hippe; Niranjan Balu; Dongxiang Xu; William S Kerwin; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-07-14 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Jie Sun; Xue-Qiao Zhao; Niranjan Balu; Daniel S Hippe; Thomas S Hatsukami; Daniel A Isquith; Kiyofumi Yamada; Moni B Neradilek; Gádor Cantón; Yunjing Xue; Jerome L Fleg; Patrice Desvigne-Nickens; Michael T Klimas; Robert J Padley; Maria T Vassileva; Bradley T Wyman; Chun Yuan Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-09-13 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Harm A Nieuwstadt; Zaid A M Kassar; Aad van der Lugt; Marcel Breeuwer; Anton F W van der Steen; Jolanda J Wentzel; Frank J H Gijsen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jianmin Yuan; Ammara Usman; Scott A Reid; Kevin F King; Andrew J Patterson; Jonathan H Gillard; Martin J Graves Journal: MAGMA Date: 2017-06-26 Impact factor: 2.310