Literature DB >> 22127074

Utilization of laparoscopy in colorectal surgery for cancer at academic medical centers: does site of surgery affect rate of laparoscopy?

Joseph C Carmichael1, Hossein Masoomi, Steven Mills, Michael J Stamos, Ninh T Nguyen.   

Abstract

Use of laparoscopy in colorectal cancer surgery is still limited. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of use of laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer at academic medical centers and to evaluate if the site of surgery influences the rate of use. Clinical data of patients who underwent laparoscopic or open colon and rectal resections for cancer from 2007 to 2009 were obtained from the University HealthSystem Consortium database. Data concerning rate of laparoscopy, length of stay, morbidity, and risk-adjusted mortality were obtained. During the 36-month study period, 22,780 operations were performed. The overall rate for use of laparoscopy was 14.8 per cent. Laparoscopy was most often used for total colectomy (22.6%), sigmoid colectomy (17.3%), cecectomy (17.1%), and right hemicolectomy (17.0%). Laparoscopy was most infrequently used for abdominoperineal resection (8.0%), transverse colectomy (10.0%), and left hemicolectomy (13.1%). Length of stay for laparoscopic colon and rectal procedures was 3.2 days shorter than for open surgery. Although the benefits of laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer have been demonstrated, the use of laparoscopy for colorectal resection remains under 20 per cent for colon cancer and under 10 per cent for rectal cancer. Further studies are needed to determine the factors limiting the use of laparoscopy in colorectal surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22127074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  13 in total

Review 1.  Review of single incision laparoscopic surgery in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Nisreen Madhoun; Deborah S Keller; Eric M Haas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopy vs open colectomy among nonmetastatic colon cancer patients: an analysis using the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Zhiyuan Zheng; Ahmedin Jemal; Chun Chieh Lin; Chung-Yuan Hu; George J Chang
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Robotic approaches may offer benefit in colorectal procedures, more controversial in other areas: a review of 168,248 cases.

Authors:  Maria S Altieri; Jie Yang; Dana A Telem; Jiawen Zhu; Caitlin Halbert; Mark Talamini; Aurora D Pryor
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  A Comparison of Pathologic Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Resections for Rectal Cancer Using the ACS-NSQIP Proctectomy-Targeted Database: a Propensity Score Analysis.

Authors:  Richard Garfinkle; Maria Abou-Khalil; Sahir Bhatnagar; Nathalie Wong-Chong; Laurent Azoulay; Nancy Morin; Carol-Ann Vasilevsky; Marylise Boutros
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Predicting opportunities to increase utilization of laparoscopy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Jiejing Qiu; Anthony J Senagore
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  A national evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes in open versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Conor P Delaney; Lobat Hashemi; Eric M Haas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopy may decrease morbidity and length of stay after elective colon cancer resection, especially in frail patients: results from an observational real-life study.

Authors:  Carlos Cerdán Santacruz; Matteo Frasson; Blas Flor-Lorente; José Luis Ramos Rodríguez; Marta Trallero Anoro; Mónica Millán Scheiding; Olga Maseda Díaz; Paula Dujovne Lindenbaum; Andrés Monzón Abad; Eduardo García-Granero Ximenez
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Predicting opportunities to increase utilization of laparoscopy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Niraj Parikh; Anthony J Senagore
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive versus open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Christina M Papageorge; Qianqian Zhao; Eugene F Foley; Bruce A Harms; Charles P Heise; Evie H Carchman; Gregory D Kennedy
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 10.  Education and Training in Transanal Endoscopic Surgery and Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; F Borja de Lacy; Roel Hompes
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2021-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.