Literature DB >> 22126892

Validation of subject-specific cardiovascular system models from porcine measurements.

James A Revie1, David J Stevenson, J Geoffrey Chase, Christopher E Hann, Bernard C Lambermont, Alexandre Ghuysen, Philippe Kolh, Geoffrey M Shaw, Stefan Heldmann, Thomas Desaive.   

Abstract

A previously validated mathematical model of the cardiovascular system (CVS) is made subject-specific using an iterative, proportional gain-based identification method. Prior works utilised a complete set of experimentally measured data that is not clinically typical or applicable. In this paper, parameters are identified using proportional gain-based control and a minimal, clinically available set of measurements. The new method makes use of several intermediary steps through identification of smaller compartmental models of CVS to reduce the number of parameters identified simultaneously and increase the convergence stability of the method. This new, clinically relevant, minimal measurement approach is validated using a porcine model of acute pulmonary embolism (APE). Trials were performed on five pigs, each inserted with three autologous blood clots of decreasing size over a period of four to five hours. All experiments were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty at the University of Liege, Belgium. Continuous aortic and pulmonary artery pressures (P(ao), P(pa)) were measured along with left and right ventricle pressure and volume waveforms. Subject-specific CVS models were identified from global end diastolic volume (GEDV), stroke volume (SV), P(ao), and P(pa) measurements, with the mean volumes and maximum pressures of the left and right ventricles used to verify the accuracy of the fitted models. The inputs (GEDV, SV, P(ao), P(pa)) used in the identification process were matched by the CVS model to errors <0.5%. Prediction of the mean ventricular volumes and maximum ventricular pressures not used to fit the model compared experimental measurements to median absolute errors of 4.3% and 4.4%, which are equivalent to the measurement errors of currently used monitoring devices in the ICU (∼5-10%). These results validate the potential for implementing this approach in the intensive care unit.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22126892     DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2011.10.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed        ISSN: 0169-2607            Impact factor:   5.428


  15 in total

1.  Algorithmic processing of pressure waveforms to facilitate estimation of cardiac elastance.

Authors:  David Stevenson; James Revie; J Geoffrey Chase; Christopher E Hann; Geoffrey M Shaw; Bernard Lambermont; Alexandre Ghuysen; Philippe Kolh; Thomas Desaive
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 2.819

2.  Patient-specific parameter estimation in single-ventricle lumped circulation models under uncertainty.

Authors:  Daniele E Schiavazzi; Alessia Baretta; Giancarlo Pennati; Tain-Yen Hsia; Alison L Marsden
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.747

3.  Predictive Modeling of Secondary Pulmonary Hypertension in Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction.

Authors:  Karlyn K Harrod; Jeffrey L Rogers; Jeffrey A Feinstein; Alison L Marsden; Daniele E Schiavazzi
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  A computational bio-chemo-mechanical model of in vivo tissue-engineered vascular graft development.

Authors:  Ramak Khosravi; Abhay B Ramachandra; Jason M Szafron; Daniele E Schiavazzi; Christopher K Breuer; Jay D Humphrey
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  On a sparse pressure-flow rate condensation of rigid circulation models.

Authors:  D E Schiavazzi; T Y Hsia; A L Marsden
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Inverse problems in reduced order models of cardiovascular haemodynamics: aspects of data assimilation and heart rate variability.

Authors:  Sanjay Pant; Chiara Corsini; Catriona Baker; Tain-Yen Hsia; Giancarlo Pennati; Irene E Vignon-Clementel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Beat-to-beat estimation of the continuous left and right cardiac elastance from metrics commonly available in clinical settings.

Authors:  David Stevenson; James Revie; J Geoffrey Chase; Christopher E Hann; Geoffrey M Shaw; Bernard Lambermont; Alexandre Ghuysen; Philippe Kolh; Thomas Desaive
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Simulation of left atrial function using a multi-scale model of the cardiovascular system.

Authors:  Antoine Pironet; Pierre C Dauby; Sabine Paeme; Sarah Kosta; J Geoffrey Chase; Thomas Desaive
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A multi-scale cardiovascular system model can account for the load-dependence of the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship.

Authors:  Antoine Pironet; Thomas Desaive; Sarah Kosta; Alexandra Lucas; Sabine Paeme; Arnaud Collet; Christopher G Pretty; Philippe Kolh; Pierre C Dauby
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 2.819

10.  Evaluation of a model-based hemodynamic monitoring method in a porcine study of septic shock.

Authors:  James A Revie; David Stevenson; J Geoffrey Chase; Chris J Pretty; Bernard C Lambermont; Alexandre Ghuysen; Philippe Kolh; Geoffrey M Shaw; Thomas Desaive
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 2.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.