Literature DB >> 22126610

Accuracy of clinical prediction rules in peptic ulcer perforation: an observational study.

David Levarett Buck1, Morten Vester-Andersen, Morten Hylander Møller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare the ability of four clinical prediction rules to predict adverse outcome in perforated peptic ulcer (PPU): the Boey score, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, and the sepsis score.
DESIGN: an observational multicenter study. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTINGS: a total of 117 patients surgically treated for PPU between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2009 in seven gastrointestinal departments in Denmark were included. Pregnant and breastfeeding women, non-surgically treated patients, patients with malignant ulcers, and patients with perforation of other organs were excluded. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: 30-day mortality rate. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: the ability of four clinical prediction rules to distinguish survivors from non-survivors (discrimination ability) was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), positive predictive values (PPVs), negative predictive values (NPVs), and adjusted relative risks.
RESULTS: Median age (range) was 70 years (25-92 years), 51% of the patients were females, and 73% of the patients had at least one co-existing disease. The 30-day mortality proportion was 17% (20/117). The AUCs: the Boey score, 0.63; the sepsis score, 0.69; the ASA score, 0.73; and the APACHE II score, 0.76. Overall, the PPVs of all four prediction rules were low and the NPVs high.
CONCLUSIONS: The Boey score, the ASA score, the APACHE II score, and the sepsis score predict mortality poorly in patients with PPU.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22126610     DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2011.639078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  9 in total

1.  Risk factors influencing morbidity and mortality in perforated peptic ulcer disease.

Authors:  İlhan Taş; Burak Veli Ülger; Akın Önder; Murat Kapan; Zübeyir Bozdağ
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2014-10-20

2.  Outcomes of Nonoperative Treatment for Gastroduodenal Ulcer Perforation: a Nationwide Study of 14,918 Inpatients in Japan.

Authors:  Takaaki Konishi; Michimasa Fujiogi; Nobuaki Michihata; Ryosuke Kumazawa; Hiroki Matsui; Kiyohide Fushimi; Masahiko Tanabe; Yasuyuki Seto; Hideo Yasunaga
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  What is the best predictor of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer disease? A population-based, multivariable regression analysis including three clinical scoring systems.

Authors:  Kenneth Thorsen; Jon Arne Søreide; Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  A practical scoring system to predict mortality in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Ebru Menekse; Belma Kocer; Ramazan Topcu; Aydemir Olmez; Mesut Tez; Cuneyt Kayaalp
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 5.  Perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Kjetil Søreide; Kenneth Thorsen; Ewen M Harrison; Juliane Bingener; Morten H Møller; Michael Ohene-Yeboah; Jon Arne Søreide
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Retrospective Cohort Study of Risk Factors among Black Africans in Côte d'Ivoire.

Authors:  Soro Kountele Gona; Mahassadi Kouamé Alassan; Koffi Gnangoran Marcellin; Kissi Ya Henriette; Coulibaly Adama; Assohoun Toussaint; Ehua Adjoba Manuela; Seu Gagon Sylvain; Afum-Adjei Awuah Anthony; Ehua Somian Francis
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 2.260

7.  Assessment of PULP score in predicting 30-day perforated duodenal ulcer morbidity, and comparison of its performance with Boey and ASA, a retrospective study.

Authors:  Tamer Saafan; Walid El Ansari; Omer Al-Yahri; Ammar Eleter; Hisham Eljohary; Rashad Alfkey; Mustafa Hajjar; Ali Toffaha; Abdelrahman El Osta
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2019-05-10

Review 8.  Scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Kenneth Thorsen; Jon Arne Søreide; Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  A Fast and Reliable Method to Interpret Short-Term Mortality in Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Red Cell Distribution Width is Sensitive and Specific.

Authors:  Okan Murat Akturk; Mikail Çakır; Yaşar Murat Vardar; Doğan Yıldırım; Muzaffer Akıncı
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2021-05-18
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.