Literature DB >> 22125585

Living with a `women's disease': risk appraisal and management among men with osteoporosis.

Samantha L Solimeo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is clear evidence that men suffer from osteoporosis (OP) in increasing numbers, but that men commonly remain underdiagnosed, undertreated and experience poorer outcomes than do women. The widespread sociocultural association of OP with postmenopausal women reflects their greater risk for developing the disorder, but the sexing of OP as a women's disease disadvantages at-risk men.
METHODS: This paper reports on qualitative data gathered from 23 community-residing men who have an OP diagnosis.
RESULTS: Interviews with men reveal that the sexing of OP as a female disease may affect men's risk appraisal. Men clearly associate OP risk factors with women and accordingly may feel protected from the disorder. Subsequent to diagnosis, men's OP-related risk management strategies reveal that men's gender identity constrains their ability to enact risk-reducing behavior.
CONCLUSIONS: Men may internalize the association of OP with women and incorporate it into a sense of perceived invulnerability to the condition, which, in turn, contributes to delayed diagnosis and treatment. Limited male-specific treatment and support options as well as social expectations of male gender performance play roles in men's health behavior.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22125585      PMCID: PMC3223980          DOI: 10.1016/j.jomh.2011.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mens Health        ISSN: 1875-6859            Impact factor:   0.537


  22 in total

Review 1.  Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men's well-being: a theory of gender and health.

Authors:  W H Courtenay
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 2.  The need for increasing awareness of osteoporosis in men.

Authors:  Robert A Adler
Journal:  Clin Cornerstone       Date:  2006

Review 3.  The clinical impact of vertebral fractures: quality of life in women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  D T Gold
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model.

Authors:  I M Rosenstock; V J Strecher; M H Becker
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1988

5.  Health Beliefs about Osteoporosis and Osteoporosis Screening in Older Women and Men.

Authors:  Smita Nayak; Mark S Roberts; Chung-Chou H Chang; Susan L Greenspan
Journal:  Health Educ J       Date:  2010-09

6.  Older men's explanatory model for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Samantha L Solimeo; Thomas J Weber; Deborah T Gold
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2011-02-10

7.  Making the invisible body visible. Bone scans, osteoporosis and women's bodily experiences.

Authors:  Susanne Dalsgaard Reventlow; Lotte Hvas; Kirsti Malterud
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Gender relations and applied research on aging.

Authors:  Toni Calasanti
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2010-10-18

Review 9.  The nonskeletal consequences of osteoporotic fractures. Psychologic and social outcomes.

Authors:  D T Gold
Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.670

10.  Male cancer: a qualitative study of male breast cancer.

Authors:  L France; S Michie; P Barrett-Lee; K Brain; P Harper; J Gray
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.380

View more
  7 in total

1.  Sex differences in osteoporosis self-efficacy among community-residing older adults presenting for DXA.

Authors:  S L Solimeo; V-T T Nguyen; S W Edmonds; Y Lou; D W Roblin; K G Saag; P Cram; F D Wolinsky
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Osteoporosis knowledge, health beliefs, and self-efficacy in Hong Kong Chinese men.

Authors:  Sue Seen Tsing Lo; Wai Ming Kok
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 2.617

3.  Effect of dihydrotestosterone, 17-β-estrogen, genistein and equol on remodeling and morphology of bone in osteoporotic male rats during bone healing.

Authors:  Philipp Kauffmann; Anna Rau; Dana Seidlová-Wuttke; Hubertus Jarry; Boris Schminke; Swantje Matthes; Karl Günter Wiese
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2020-07-28

4.  Osteoporosis prevention: where are the barriers to improvement in a French general population? A qualitative study.

Authors:  B Merle; C Dupraz; J Haesebaert; L Barraud; M Aussedat; C Motteau; V Simon; A M Schott; M Flori
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Causes, consequences, and treatment of osteoporosis in men.

Authors:  Jameela Banu
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 4.162

6.  Expressed information needs of patients with osteoporosis and/or fragility fractures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Grace Raybould; Opeyemi Babatunde; Amy L Evans; Joanne L Jordan; Zoe Paskins
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 2.617

7.  Factors Associated With Osteoporosis Care of Men Hospitalized for Hip Fracture: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Samantha L Solimeo; Kimberly McCoy; Heather Schacht Reisinger; Robert A Adler; Mary Vaughan Sarrazin
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2019-06-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.