STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the sagittal balance after single-level cervical disc replacement (CDR) and range of motion (ROM). To define clinical and radiologic parameters those have a significant correlation with segmental and overall cervical curvature after CDR. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Clinical outcomes and ROM after CDR with Mobi-C (LDR, Troyes, France) prosthesis have been documented in few studies. No earlier report of this prosthesis has studied correlations between static and dynamic parameters or those between static parameters and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Forty patients were evaluated. Clinical outcome was assessed using the Short Form-36 questionnaire, Neck Disability Index, and a Visual Analog Scale. Spineview software (Surgiview, Paris, France) was used to investigate sagittal balance parameters and ROM. The mean follow-up was 24.3 months (range: 12 to 36 mo). RESULTS: Clinical outcomes were satisfactory. There was a significant improvement of Short Form-36, Neck Disability Index, and Visual Analog Scale scores. Mean ROM was 8.3 degrees preoperatively and 11.0 degrees postoperatively (P=0.013). Mean preoperative C2C7 curvature was 12.8 and 16.0 degrees at last follow-up (P=0.001). Mean preoperative functional spinal unit (FSU) angle was 2.3 and 5.3 degrees postoperatively (P<0.0001). Mean postoperative shell angle was 5.5 degrees. There was a significant correlation between postoperative C2C7 alignment and preoperative C2C7 alignment, change of C2C7 alignment, preoperative and postoperative FSU angle, and prosthesis shell angle. There was also a significant correlation between postoperative FSU angle and preoperative C2C7 alignment, preoperative FSU angle, change of FSU angle, and prosthesis shell angle. Regression analysis showed that prosthesis shell angle and preoperative FSU angle contributed significantly to postoperative FSU angle. Moreover, preoperative C2C7 alignment, preoperative FSU angle, postoperative FSU angle, and prosthesis shell angle contributed significantly to postoperative C2C7 alignment. No significant correlation was observed between ROM and sagittal parameters. Few correlations were found between sagittal alignment and clinical results. CONCLUSIONS: CDR with this prosthesis provided favorable clinical outcomes and maintains ROM of the FSU, overall and segmental cervical alignment. Long-term follow-up will be needed to assess the effectiveness and advantages of this procedure.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the sagittal balance after single-level cervical disc replacement (CDR) and range of motion (ROM). To define clinical and radiologic parameters those have a significant correlation with segmental and overall cervical curvature after CDR. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Clinical outcomes and ROM after CDR with Mobi-C (LDR, Troyes, France) prosthesis have been documented in few studies. No earlier report of this prosthesis has studied correlations between static and dynamic parameters or those between static parameters and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Forty patients were evaluated. Clinical outcome was assessed using the Short Form-36 questionnaire, Neck Disability Index, and a Visual Analog Scale. Spineview software (Surgiview, Paris, France) was used to investigate sagittal balance parameters and ROM. The mean follow-up was 24.3 months (range: 12 to 36 mo). RESULTS: Clinical outcomes were satisfactory. There was a significant improvement of Short Form-36, Neck Disability Index, and Visual Analog Scale scores. Mean ROM was 8.3 degrees preoperatively and 11.0 degrees postoperatively (P=0.013). Mean preoperative C2C7 curvature was 12.8 and 16.0 degrees at last follow-up (P=0.001). Mean preoperative functional spinal unit (FSU) angle was 2.3 and 5.3 degrees postoperatively (P<0.0001). Mean postoperative shell angle was 5.5 degrees. There was a significant correlation between postoperative C2C7 alignment and preoperative C2C7 alignment, change of C2C7 alignment, preoperative and postoperative FSU angle, and prosthesis shell angle. There was also a significant correlation between postoperative FSU angle and preoperative C2C7 alignment, preoperative FSU angle, change of FSU angle, and prosthesis shell angle. Regression analysis showed that prosthesis shell angle and preoperative FSU angle contributed significantly to postoperative FSU angle. Moreover, preoperative C2C7 alignment, preoperative FSU angle, postoperative FSU angle, and prosthesis shell angle contributed significantly to postoperative C2C7 alignment. No significant correlation was observed between ROM and sagittal parameters. Few correlations were found between sagittal alignment and clinical results. CONCLUSIONS:CDR with this prosthesis provided favorable clinical outcomes and maintains ROM of the FSU, overall and segmental cervical alignment. Long-term follow-up will be needed to assess the effectiveness and advantages of this procedure.
Authors: Marie Roguski; Edward C Benzel; Jill N Curran; Subu N Magge; Erica F Bisson; Ajit A Krishnaney; Michael P Steinmetz; William E Butler; Robert F Heary; Zoher Ghogawala Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2014-12-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Peter G Passias; Samantha R Horn; Cheongeun Oh; Subaraman Ramchandran; Douglas C Burton; Virginie Lafage; Renaud Lafage; Gregory W Poorman; Leah Steinmetz; Frank A Segreto; Cole A Bortz; Justin S Smith; Christopher Ames; Christopher I Shaffrey; Han Jo Kim; Alexandra Soroceanu; Eric O Klineberg Journal: J Spine Surg Date: 2018-06