Literature DB >> 22124157

Remodelers organize cellular chromatin by counteracting intrinsic histone-DNA sequence preferences in a class-specific manner.

Yuri M Moshkin1, Gillian E Chalkley, Tsung Wai Kan, B Ashok Reddy, Zeliha Ozgur, Wilfred F J van Ijcken, Dick H W Dekkers, Jeroen A Demmers, Andrew A Travers, C Peter Verrijzer.   

Abstract

The nucleosome is the fundamental repeating unit of eukaryotic chromatin. Here, we assessed the interplay between DNA sequence and ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling factors (remodelers) in the nucleosomal organization of a eukaryotic genome. We compared the genome-wide distribution of Drosophila NURD, (P)BAP, INO80, and ISWI, representing the four major remodeler families. Each remodeler has a unique set of genomic targets and generates distinct chromatin signatures. Remodeler loci have characteristic DNA sequence features, predicted to influence nucleosome formation. Strikingly, remodelers counteract DNA sequence-driven nucleosome distribution in two distinct ways. NURD, (P)BAP, and INO80 increase histone density at their target sequences, which intrinsically disfavor positioned nucleosome formation. In contrast, ISWI promotes open chromatin at sites that are propitious for precise nucleosome placement. Remodelers influence nucleosome organization genome-wide, reflecting their high genomic density and the propagation of nucleosome redistribution beyond remodeler binding sites. In transcriptionally silent early embryos, nucleosome organization correlates with intrinsic histone-DNA sequence preferences. Following differential expression of the genome, however, this relationship diminishes and eventually disappears. We conclude that the cellular nucleosome landscape is the result of the balance between DNA sequence-driven nucleosome placement and active nucleosome repositioning by remodelers and the transcription machinery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22124157      PMCID: PMC3266603          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.06365-11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  65 in total

1.  Genome-wide location and regulated recruitment of the RSC nucleosome-remodeling complex.

Authors:  Huck Hui Ng; François Robert; Richard A Young; Kevin Struhl
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  High-throughput sequencing reveals a simple model of nucleosome energetics.

Authors:  George Locke; Denis Tolkunov; Zarmik Moqtaderi; Kevin Struhl; Alexandre V Morozov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  FAIRE (Formaldehyde-Assisted Isolation of Regulatory Elements) isolates active regulatory elements from human chromatin.

Authors:  Paul G Giresi; Jonghwan Kim; Ryan M McDaniell; Vishwanath R Iyer; Jason D Lieb
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Remosomes: RSC generated non-mobilized particles with approximately 180 bp DNA loosely associated with the histone octamer.

Authors:  Manu Shubhdarshan Shukla; Sajad Hussain Syed; Fabien Montel; Cendrine Faivre-Moskalenko; Jan Bednar; Andrew Travers; Dimitar Angelov; Stefan Dimitrov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution.

Authors:  K Luger; A W Mäder; R K Richmond; D F Sargent; T J Richmond
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-09-18       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Structure of chromatin.

Authors:  R D Kornberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 7.  Chromatin remodelling during development.

Authors:  Lena Ho; Gerald R Crabtree
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  A role for Snf2-related nucleosome-spacing enzymes in genome-wide nucleosome organization.

Authors:  Triantaffyllos Gkikopoulos; Pieta Schofield; Vijender Singh; Marina Pinskaya; Jane Mellor; Michaela Smolle; Jerry L Workman; Geoffrey J Barton; Tom Owen-Hughes
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  An in vitro-identified high-affinity nucleosome-positioning signal is capable of transiently positioning a nucleosome in vivo.

Authors:  Lia E Gracey; Zhi-Ying Chen; Jay M Maniar; Anton Valouev; Arend Sidow; Mark A Kay; Andrew Z Fire
Journal:  Epigenetics Chromatin       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 4.954

10.  Divergent human remodeling complexes remove nucleosomes from strong positioning sequences.

Authors:  Chuong D Pham; Xi He; Gavin R Schnitzler
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  41 in total

Review 1.  Nucleosome remodeling and epigenetics.

Authors:  Peter B Becker; Jerry L Workman
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  Genome-wide nucleosome positioning during embryonic stem cell development.

Authors:  Vladimir B Teif; Yevhen Vainshtein; Maïwen Caudron-Herger; Jan-Philipp Mallm; Caroline Marth; Thomas Höfer; Karsten Rippe
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2012-10-21       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 3.  Mi-2/NuRD chromatin remodeling complexes regulate B and T-lymphocyte development and function.

Authors:  Carissa Dege; James Hagman
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 12.988

4.  Functional interactions between NURF and Ctcf regulate gene expression.

Authors:  Zhijun Qiu; Carolyn Song; Navid Malakouti; Daniel Murray; Aymen Hariz; Mark Zimmerman; Derek Gygax; Aiman Alhazmi; Joseph W Landry
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Characterizing the nuclease accessibility of DNA in human cells to map higher order structures of chromatin.

Authors:  Uwe Schwartz; Attila Németh; Sarah Diermeier; Josef H Exler; Stefan Hansch; Rodrigo Maldonado; Leonhard Heizinger; Rainer Merkl; Gernot Längst
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  INO80-dependent regression of ecdysone-induced transcriptional responses regulates developmental timing in Drosophila.

Authors:  Sarah D Neuman; Robert J Ihry; Kelly M Gruetzmacher; Arash Bashirullah
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.582

7.  PICKLE is a CHD subfamily II ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling factor.

Authors:  Kwok Ki Ho; Heng Zhang; Barbara L Golden; Joe Ogas
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-11-02

8.  Covalent Modifications of Histone H3K9 Promote Binding of CHD3.

Authors:  Adam H Tencer; Khan L Cox; Luo Di; Joseph B Bridgers; Jie Lyu; Xiaodong Wang; Jennifer K Sims; Tyler M Weaver; Hillary F Allen; Yi Zhang; Jovylyn Gatchalian; Michael A Darcy; Matthew D Gibson; Jinzen Ikebe; Wei Li; Paul A Wade; Jeffrey J Hayes; Brian D Strahl; Hidetoshi Kono; Michael G Poirier; Catherine A Musselman; Tatiana G Kutateladze
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 9.  Regulation of ISWI chromatin remodelling activity.

Authors:  Maria Toto; Giulia D'Angelo; Davide F V Corona
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  Transcriptional Regulators Compete with Nucleosomes Post-replication.

Authors:  Srinivas Ramachandran; Steven Henikoff
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 41.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.