Literature DB >> 22123163

Confusion regarding cervical cancer screening and chlamydia screening among sexually active young women.

Oluwatobi Awele Ogbechie1, Michele R Hacker, Laura E Dodge, Mitalee Milan Patil, Hope A Ricciotti.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recently recommended that cervical cancer screening begin at 21 years of age and occur biennially for low-risk women younger than 30 years. Earlier studies suggested that women may have limited understanding of the differences between cervical cancer screening and chlamydia screening. This study assessed the knowledge of chlamydia and cervical cancer screening tests and schedules in younger women.
METHODS: A survey regarding knowledge of chlamydia and cervical cancer screening was administered to 60 younger women aged 18-25 years in an obstetrics and gynaecology clinic at an urban community health centre.
RESULTS: The majority of respondents recalled having had a Pap smear (93.3%) or chlamydia test (75.0%). Although many respondents understood that a Pap smear checks for cervical cancer (88.3%) and human papillomavirus (68.3%), 71.7% mistakenly believed that a Pap smear screens for chlamydia. No respondent correctly identified the revised cervical cancer screening schedule, and 83.3% selected annual screening. Few respondents (23.3%) identified the annual chlamydia screening schedule and 26.7% were unsure.
CONCLUSION: Many younger women in an urban community health centre believed that cervical cancer screening also screens for chlamydia and were confused about chlamydia screening schedules. As there is limited knowledge of the revised ACOG cervical cancer screening guidelines, there is a risk that currently low chlamydia screening rates may decrease further after these new guidelines are better known. Obstetrician gynaecologists and primary care providers should educate younger women about the differences between chlamydia and cervical cancer screening and encourage sexually active younger women to have annual chlamydia screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22123163      PMCID: PMC3724364          DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2011-050289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Infect        ISSN: 1368-4973            Impact factor:   3.519


  10 in total

1.  2009 cervical cytology guidelines and chlamydia testing among sexually active young women.

Authors:  Guoyu Tao; Karen W Hoover; Charlotte K Kent
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Ignorance about Chlamydia among sexually active women--a two centre study.

Authors:  S Macmillan; R Walker; E Oloto; A Fitzmaurice; A Templeton
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Chlamydia screening in a Health Plan before and after a national performance measure introduction.

Authors:  Gale R Burstein; Mark H Snyder; Deborah Conley; Daniel R Newman; Cathleen M Walsh; Guoyu Tao; Kathleen L Irwin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  ACOG Practice Bulletin no. 109: Cervical cytology screening.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Gonorrhea and chlamydia screening among young women: stage of change, decisional balance, and self-efficacy.

Authors:  Chantay Banikarim; Mariam R Chacko; Constance M Wiemann; Peggy B Smith
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.012

Review 6.  Screening for chlamydial infection: an evidence update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  David S Meyers; Heather Halvorson; Sara Luckhaupt
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Screening for chlamydial infection: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Chlamydia screening among sexually active young female enrollees of health plans--United States, 2000-2007.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 17.586

9.  Knowledge of Chlamydia trachomatis among men and women approached to participate in community-based screening, Scotland, UK.

Authors:  Karen Lorimer; Graham J Hart
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 10.  Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Natasha L Pavlin; Jane M Gunn; Rhian Parker; Christopher K Fairley; Jane Hocking
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 3.295

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015.

Authors:  Kimberly A Workowski; Gail A Bolan
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2015-06-05

2.  Estimating chlamydia screening coverage: a comparison of self-report and health care effectiveness data and information set measures.

Authors:  Christine M Khosropour; Jennifer M Broad; Delia Scholes; Jacquelyn Saint-Johnson; Lisa E Manhart; Matthew R Golden
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  "The Vagina is a Very Tricky Little Thing Down There": Cervical Health Literacy among Incarcerated Women.

Authors:  Megha Ramaswamy; Patricia J Kelly
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2015-11

Review 4.  Current recommendations for cervical cancer screening: do they render the annual pelvic examination obsolete?

Authors:  Robert P Kauffman; Stephen J Griffin; Jon D Lund; Paul E Tullar
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 1.927

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.