Literature DB >> 12667733

Gonorrhea and chlamydia screening among young women: stage of change, decisional balance, and self-efficacy.

Chantay Banikarim1, Mariam R Chacko, Constance M Wiemann, Peggy B Smith.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess perceived sexually transmitted disease (STD) (gonorrhea and chlamdydia) screening behaviors among young women at risk for STDs by evaluating readiness, pros and cons, and self-efficacy to seek STD screening in the absence of symptoms.
METHODS: Two hundred forty young urban women (mean 18.8 years +/-1.59) consecutively attending an urban reproductive clinic voluntarily completed a 67-item questionnaire on STD screening behaviors that included the stages of change (SOCs), decisional balance, and self-efficacy as well as sexual practices and partner relationships. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, multivariate analyses of variance, Chi-square tests, and Wilcoxon signed rank test.
RESULTS: Ninety-five percent of the participants would be willing to obtain STD screening for early disease detection. Participants were further along the SOCs for STD screening following unprotected sex with a change in partner than main partner, (p <.001). Pros and cons of STD screening varied according to the SOCs for STD screening with a change in partner and main partner. Self-efficacy increased linearly along the SOCs for STD screening (p <.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Most young women recognize the importance of STD screening but are not currently being tested when at risk for STDs. STD screening behaviors varied according to the partner relationship, which highlights the importance of stage- and partner-matched counseling to promote STD screening particularly when at risk for STDs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12667733     DOI: 10.1016/s1054-139x(02)00706-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adolesc Health        ISSN: 1054-139X            Impact factor:   5.012


  11 in total

1.  Accuracy of the stages of change algorithm: sexual risk reported in the maintenance stage of change.

Authors:  Rebecca A Ferrer; K Rivet Amico; Angela Bryan; William A Fisher; Deborah H Cornman; Susan M Kiene; Jeffrey D Fisher
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2008-10-18

2.  Relationships between perceived STD-related stigma, STD-related shame and STD screening among a household sample of adolescents.

Authors:  Shayna D Cunningham; Deanna L Kerrigan; Jacky M Jennings; Jonathan M Ellen
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2009-12

3.  Efficacy of a motivational behavioral intervention to promote chlamydia and gonorrhea screening in young women: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mariam R Chacko; Constance M Wiemann; Claudia A Kozinetz; Kirk von Sternberg; Mary M Velasquez; Peggy B Smith; Ralph DiClemente
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 5.012

4.  Confusion regarding cervical cancer screening and chlamydia screening among sexually active young women.

Authors:  Oluwatobi Awele Ogbechie; Michele R Hacker; Laura E Dodge; Mitalee Milan Patil; Hope A Ricciotti
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 3.519

5.  Stages of change, decisional balance, and self-efficacy in condom use among rural African-American stimulant users.

Authors:  Donna L Gullette; Patricia B Wright; Brenda M Booth; Zachary Feldman; Katharine E Stewart
Journal:  J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.354

6.  New sexual partners and readiness to seek screening for chlamydia and gonorrhoea: predictors among minority young women.

Authors:  M R Chacko; C M Wiemann; C A Kozinetz; R J Diclemente; P B Smith; M M Velasquez; K von Sternberg
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.519

7.  Young women's perspective of the pros and cons to seeking screening for chlamydia and gonorrhea: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Mariam R Chacko; Kirk von Sternberg; Mary M Velasquez; Constance M Wiemann; Peggy B Smith; Ralph DiClemente
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.814

8.  Home-based chlamydia testing of young people attending a music festival--who will pee and post?

Authors:  Rachel Sacks-Davis; Judy Gold; Campbell K Aitken; Margaret E Hellard
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Correlates of STI testing among vocational school students in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Mireille E G Wolfers; Gerjo Kok; Johan P Mackenbach; Onno de Zwart
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 10.  Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Natasha L Pavlin; Jane M Gunn; Rhian Parker; Christopher K Fairley; Jane Hocking
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.