Literature DB >> 22122555

Magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy in men with previously negative prostate biopsy results.

Seung Hwan Lee1, Mun Su Chung, Joo Hee Kim, Young Taik Oh, Koon Ho Rha, Byung Ha Chung.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to characterize clinicopathologic features of tumors detected with targeted prostate biopsy in men with previous negative prostate biopsy results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively studied 87 patients with a persistently increasing level of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), at least one previous set of negative 12-core prostate biopsies, and normal digital rectal examination. All patients were examined with combined T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI before undergoing the prostate biopsy. Prostate biopsy was performed using transrectal ultrasonography-guided standard 12 cores plus targeted biopsy to suspicious region(s) as identified on T2 images on their MRI.
RESULTS: Of a total of 87 cases, 82 (94.2%) patients had suspicious lesion(s) on their MRI. Of these 82 patients, 46 (56.0%) patients had prostate cancer (PCA) as determined by the biopsy. The patients with PCA showed a significantly higher incidence of having suspicious lesion(s) (the anterior or apex) on MRI than the patients without PCA (P<0.05). On analysis by dividing all biopsy cores into the targeted cores and standard cores, PCA was found in 149/518 (28.8%) MRI-targeted cores and in 32/903 (3.6%) standard cores (P=0.012) Of 43 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy, 37 (86.0%) patients were detected with PCA located at the anterior or apex portion of the prostate. For tumor characteristics according to tumor locations, there was no significant correlation between tumor location and Gleason scores or pathologic stage.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that a MRI-targeted prostate biopsy after prostate MRI might be considered for the identification of cancer foci and the detection of PCA, for patients with a previous negative standard prostate biopsy result despite a persistently elevated PSA value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22122555     DOI: 10.1089/end.2011.0393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  14 in total

1.  The Efficacy of Target Biopsy of Suspected Cancer Lesions Detected by Magnetic Resonance Imaging and/or Transrectal Ultrasonography during Initial Prostate Biopsies: Comparison of Outcomes between Two Physicians.

Authors:  Hideto Iwamoto; Tetsuya Yumioka; Noriya Yamaguchi; Seiya Inoue; Toshihiko Masago; Shuichi Morizane; Akihisa Yao; Masashi Honda; Takehiro Sejima; Atsushi Takenaka
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 1.641

Review 2.  Prostate MRI and transperineal TRUS/MRI fusion biopsy for prostate cancer detection: clinical practice updates.

Authors:  Eugenio Martorana; Giacomo Maria Pirola; Maria Cristina Aisa; Pietro Scialpi; Aldo Di Blasi; Giovanni Saredi; Alfredo D'Andrea; Stefano Signore; Riccardo Grisanti; Michele Scialpi
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-07-01

Review 3.  [Fusion imaging in urology: combination of MRI and TRUS for detection of prostate cancer].

Authors:  D Schilling; M Kurosch; R Mager; I Tsaur; A Haferkamp; M Röthke
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  Comparison of image-guided targeted biopsies versus systematic randomized biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic literature review of well-designed studies.

Authors:  Antoine van Hove; Pierre-Henri Savoie; Charlotte Maurin; Serge Brunelle; Gwenaëlle Gravis; Naji Salem; Jochen Walz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Reply by the Authors.

Authors:  Daniel T Oberlin; William J Catalona; Joshua J Meeks
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 6.  Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Patients with a Prior Negative Biopsy: A Consensus Statement by AUA and SAR.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Sadhna Verma; Peter Choyke; Steven C Eberhardt; Scott E Eggener; Krishnanath Gaitonde; Masoom A Haider; Daniel J Margolis; Leonard S Marks; Peter Pinto; Geoffrey A Sonn; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  The Current State of MR Imaging-targeted Biopsy Techniques for Detection of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Sadhna Verma; Peter L Choyke; Steven C Eberhardt; Aytekin Oto; Clare M Tempany; Baris Turkbey; Andrew B Rosenkrantz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Prebiopsy MRI and MRI-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy in Men With Previous Negative Biopsies: Impact on Repeat Biopsy Strategies.

Authors:  Neil Mendhiratta; Xiaosong Meng; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; James S Wysock; Michael Fenstermaker; Richard Huang; Fang-Ming Deng; Jonathan Melamed; Ming Zhou; William C Huang; Herbert Lepor; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Diagnosis of relevant prostate cancer using supplementary cores from magnetic resonance imaging-prompted areas following multiple failed biopsies.

Authors:  Daniel N Costa; B Nicolas Bloch; David F Yao; Martin G Sanda; Long Ngo; Elizabeth M Genega; Ivan Pedrosa; William C DeWolf; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 10.  MRI-targeted prostate biopsy: a review of technique and results.

Authors:  Nicola L Robertson; Mark Emberton; Caroline M Moore
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.