Literature DB >> 2212126

Comparison of methods for checking surgical margins.

R P Rapini1.   

Abstract

Surgical margins of a cutaneous neoplasm can be evaluated by various combinations of three major types of sections: vertical (perpendicular), horizontal (parallel), and oblique (Mohs method). Vertical sections may run transversely through tumor (breadloaf method), longitudinally through tumor (breadloaf-cross method), or peripheral to the tumor. The peripheral (perimeter) sectioning methods are the only methods that can evaluate almost 100% of the margin, but they have the disadvantage of not showing the relationship of the tumor to its margin, which can be seen clearly with the vertical transverse sections. Seven methods of checking surgical margins are compared and contrasted. None of these is judged to be perfect or best.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2212126     DOI: 10.1016/0190-9622(90)70212-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol        ISSN: 0190-9622            Impact factor:   11.527


  8 in total

1.  Immunohistochemistry in mohs micrographic surgery: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Novie Sroa; Shannon Campbell; Larisa Ravitskiy
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2009-07

2.  Small margin excision of periocular basal cell carcinoma: 5 year results.

Authors:  J D Hsuan; R A Harrad; M J Potts; C Collins
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 3.  [Micrographically controlled surgery. Goals and reality].

Authors:  W Weyers
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 0.751

4.  Evaluation of information presented within mast cell tumour histopathology reports in the United States: 2012-2015.

Authors:  Jennifer K Reagan; Laura E Selmic; Caroline Fallon; Elizabeth A Driskell; Laura D Garrett
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2018-06-07

5.  Polygon method: A systematic margin assessment for breast conservation.

Authors:  Shu Ichihara; Suzuko Moritani; Rieko Nishimura; Mikinao Oiwa; Takako Morita; Takako Hayashi; Aya Kato; Tokiko Endo; Akiko Kada; Noriko Ito; Tetsuo Kuroishi; Yasuyuki Sato
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 4.452

6.  Double-bladed scalpel in mohs micrographic surgery.

Authors:  Ofer Arnon; Vasileios A Pagkalos; Arsinoi A Xanthinaki; Eldad Silberstein
Journal:  ISRN Dermatol       Date:  2012-12-19

7.  Nasal Reconstruction of Post-Mohs Defects >1.5 cm in a Single Cosmetic Subunit Under Local Anesthesia by a Combination of Plastic Surgeon and Mohs Surgeon Team: A Cross-sectional Study and Review of Algorithmic Nasal Defect Closures.

Authors:  Omeed M Memar; Benjamin Caughlin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-06-05

8.  Mohs surgery: proclamation, proof, principles, and promise.

Authors:  George B Bartley
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 12.079

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.