Literature DB >> 17701143

[Micrographically controlled surgery. Goals and reality].

W Weyers1.   

Abstract

Micrographic control of surgical margins reduces the risk of recurrence following excision of malignant neoplasms and allows for limited re-excisions of incompletely excised tumors. Several methods for checking surgical margins have been proposed. Principally, transverse sections through the entire specimen must be distinguished from longitudinal sections along all lateral margins. Transverse sections do not demonstrate the entire outer surface of the specimen. This may lead to false-negative results with subsequent recurrences. Longitudinal sections along lateral margins distort the architecture of the neoplasm and may make the diagnosis more difficult. Moreover, extensions of the neoplasm that come very close to lateral margins may be included in those sections, the consequence being false-positive results leading to unnecessary re-excisions. Regardless of the method employed, extensions of the neoplasm are not always recognizable, and, therefore, recurrences cannot be excluded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17701143     DOI: 10.1007/s00105-007-1383-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hautarzt        ISSN: 0017-8470            Impact factor:   0.751


  16 in total

1.  The case for micrographically controlled skin surgery.

Authors:  M Lebwohl; J D Bernhard
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 2.  Comparison of methods for checking surgical margins.

Authors:  R P Rapini
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 3.  [Micrographic controlled surgery (3D-histology) in cutaneous melanoma].

Authors:  Matthias Möhrle
Journal:  J Dtsch Dermatol Ges       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.584

4.  [The Muffin technique--an alternative to Mohs' micrographic surgery].

Authors:  Matthias Möhrle; Helmut Breuninger
Journal:  J Dtsch Dermatol Ges       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.584

Review 5.  Mohs micrographic surgery.

Authors:  D L Shriner; D K McCoy; D J Goldberg; R F Wagner
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 11.527

6.  [A modified procedure of microscopically controlled surgery for the removal of basaliomas].

Authors:  H Audring
Journal:  Dermatol Monatsschr       Date:  1982-07

7.  Melanoma in situ versus melanocytic hyperplasia in sun-damaged skin. Assessment of the significance of histopathologic criteria for differential diagnosis.

Authors:  W Weyers; M Bonczkowitz; I Weyers; A Bittinger; W B Schill
Journal:  Am J Dermatopathol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.533

8.  High recurrence rates of Basal cell carcinoma after mohs surgery in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Khosrow Mehrany; Roger H Weenig; Mark R Pittelkow; Randall K Roenigk; Clark C Otley
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2004-08

Review 9.  A comparison between Mohs micrographic surgery and wide surgical excision for the treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.

Authors:  H M Gloster; K R Harris; R K Roenigk
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 11.527

10.  Surgical treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.

Authors:  D F Roses; Q Valensi; G LaTrenta; M N Harris
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1986-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.