Literature DB >> 22120835

Gender effect on oral volume capacity.

Weslania Viviane Nascimento1, Rachel Aguiar Cassiani, Roberto Oliveira Dantas.   

Abstract

Studies have shown anatomical and functional differences between men and women with respect to the mouth, pharynx, upper esophageal sphincter, and esophagus. The aim of this investigation was to analyze the influence of gender, body mass index (BMI), age, and orofacial anthropometric measurements on the intraoral maximum volume capacity for liquid. The investigation included asymptomatic subjects, 56 females and 44 males, aged 19-53 years. The volunteers sucked water through a straw up to the maximum tolerated oral volume, which was greater in men (71.2 ± 15.0 ml) than in women (55.4 ± 13.4 ml). Age, BMI, height, and number of teeth had no influence on the intraoral tolerated volume. Anthropometric orofacial measurements were greater in men than in women. In individuals with height between 1.66 and 1.89 m, anthropometric orofacial measurements were greater in men than in women, and the tolerated intraoral volume was greater in men than in women. There was a positive correlation between orofacial measurements and intraoral maximum volume. In conclusion, men have the capacity to place a larger volume of water inside their mouth than women. This observation is associated with higher anthropometric orofacial measures, but not with age, number of teeth, height, or BMI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22120835     DOI: 10.1007/s00455-011-9379-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dysphagia        ISSN: 0179-051X            Impact factor:   3.438


  17 in total

1.  Gender, age, vessel size, cup vs. straw sipping, and sequence effects on sip volume.

Authors:  Harry T Lawless; Sharon Bender; Carol Oman; Cathy Pelletier
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  Determining normal bolus size for thin liquids.

Authors:  I Adnerhill; O Ekberg; M E Groher
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  Effects of liquid type, delivery method, and bolus volume on penetration-aspiration scores in healthy older adults during flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing.

Authors:  Susan G Butler; Andrew Stuart; L Douglas Case; Catherine Rees; Mara Vitolins; Stephen B Kritchevsky
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.547

4.  Quantitative aspects of swallowing in an elderly nondysphagic population.

Authors:  H Nilsson; O Ekberg; R Olsson; B Hindfelt
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Effect of swallowed bolus variables on oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing.

Authors:  R O Dantas; M K Kern; B T Massey; W J Dodds; P J Kahrilas; J G Brasseur; I J Cook; I M Lang
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1990-05

6.  Gender effects on esophageal motility.

Authors:  R O Dantas; E Ferriolli; M A Souza
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.590

7.  Gender effect on the clinical measurement of swallowing.

Authors:  Leda Maria Tavares Alves; Rachel de Aguiar Cassiani; Carla Manfredi dos Santos; Roberto Oliveira Dantas
Journal:  Arq Gastroenterol       Date:  2007 Jul-Sep

8.  Sip-sizing behaviors in natural drinking conditions compared to instructed experimental conditions.

Authors:  Janice W Bennett; Pascal H H M Van Lieshout; Cathy A Pelletier; Catriona M Steele
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 3.438

9.  Effect of gender on swallow event duration assessed by videofluoroscopy.

Authors:  Roberto Oliveira Dantas; Rachel de Aguiar Cassiani; Carla Manfredi dos Santos; Geruza Costa Gonzaga; Leda Maria Tavares Alves; Suleimy Cristina Mazin
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 3.438

10.  [Normative values and sexual dimorphism in aesthetically pleasant profiles, through cephalometric computerized analysis (Ricketts and McNamara)].

Authors:  Rômulo Oliveira Valente; Marília Gerhardt de Oliverira
Journal:  Pesqui Odontol Bras       Date:  2003-08-05
View more
  7 in total

1.  Increased oral processing and a slower eating rate increase glycaemic, insulin and satiety responses to a mixed meal tolerance test.

Authors:  Ai Ting Goh; Jie Ying Michelle Choy; Xin Hui Chua; Shalini Ponnalagu; Chin Meng Khoo; Clare Whitton; Rob Martinus van Dam; Ciarán Gerard Forde
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 5.614

2.  Videofluoroscopic analysis of different volumes of liquid bolus swallowing in healthy individuals: comparison between height and sex.

Authors:  Marcia Regina Kfouri Bernardi Regueiro; Weslania Viviane Nascimento; Luana Casari Parreira; Roberto Oliveira Dantas
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.365

3.  Airborne pathogen projection during ophthalmic examination.

Authors:  Basak Bostanci Ceran; Alp Karakoç; Ertuğrul Taciroğlu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Influence of Body Height on Oral and Pharyngeal Transit Time of a Liquid Bolus in Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Marcia R K Bernardi Regueiro; Luana Casari Parreira; Weslania Viviane Nascimento; Roberto Oliveira Dantas
Journal:  Gastroenterology Res       Date:  2018-12-17

5.  Impact of food texture modifications on oral processing behaviour, bolus properties and postprandial glucose responses.

Authors:  J Y M Choy; A T Goh; G Chatonidi; S Ponnalagu; S M M Wee; M Stieger; C G Forde
Journal:  Curr Res Food Sci       Date:  2021-12-01

6.  Soft skin-interfaced mechano-acoustic sensors for real-time monitoring and patient feedback on respiratory and swallowing biomechanics.

Authors:  Youn J Kang; Hany M Arafa; Jae-Young Yoo; Cagla Kantarcigil; Jin-Tae Kim; Hyoyoung Jeong; Seonggwang Yoo; Seyong Oh; Joohee Kim; Changsheng Wu; Andreas Tzavelis; Yunyun Wu; Kyeongha Kwon; Joshua Winograd; Shuai Xu; Bonnie Martin-Harris; John A Rogers
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2022-09-20

7.  Impact of Vaping Regimens on Electronic Cigarette Efficiency.

Authors:  Sébastien Soulet; Marie Duquesne; Jean Toutain; Charly Pairaud; Maud Mercury
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.