Literature DB >> 22120690

Rectification of the EMG is an unnecessary and inappropriate step in the calculation of Corticomuscular coherence.

Verity M McClelland1, Zoran Cvetkovic, Kerry R Mills.   

Abstract

Corticomuscular coherence (CMC) estimation is a frequency domain method used to detect a linear coupling between rhythmic activity recorded from sensorimotor cortex (EEG or MEG) and the electromyogram (EMG) of active muscles. In motor neuroscience, rectification of the surface EMG is a common pre-processing step prior to calculating CMC, intended to maximize information about action potential timing, whilst suppressing information relating to motor unit action potential (MUAP) shape. Rectification is believed to produce a general shift in the EMG spectrum towards lower frequencies, including those around the mean motor unit discharge rate. However, there are no published data to support the claim that EMG rectification enhances the detection of CMC. Furthermore, performing coherence analysis after the non-linear procedure of rectification, which results in a significant distortion of the EMG spectrum, is considered fundamentally flawed in engineering and digital signal processing. We calculated CMC between sensorimotor cortex EEG and EMG of two hand muscles during a key grip task in 14 healthy subjects. CMC calculated using unrectified and rectified EMG was compared. The use of rectified EMG did not enhance the detection of CMC, nor was there any evidence that MUAP shape information had an adverse effect on the CMC estimation. EMG rectification had inconsistent effects on the power and coherence spectra and obscured the detection of CMC in some cases. We also provide a comprehensive theoretical analysis, which, along with our empirical data, demonstrates that rectification is neither necessary nor appropriate in the calculation of CMC. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22120690     DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  31 in total

1.  Modulation of corticomuscular coherence by peripheral stimuli.

Authors:  Verity M McClelland; Zoran Cvetkovic; Kerry R Mills
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Phasic stabilization of motor output after auditory and visual distractors.

Authors:  Harri Piitulainen; Mathieu Bourguignon; Eero Smeds; Xavier De Tiège; Veikko Jousmäki; Riitta Hari
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Spatial variability in cortex-muscle coherence investigated with magnetoencephalography and high-density surface electromyography.

Authors:  Harri Piitulainen; Alberto Botter; Mathieu Bourguignon; Veikko Jousmäki; Riitta Hari
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Inconsistent effects of EMG rectification on coherence analysis.

Authors:  Verity M McClelland; Zoran Cvetkovic; Kerry R Mills
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Reply from Dario Farina, Francesco Negro and Ning Jiang.

Authors:  Dario Farina; Francesco Negro; Ning Jiang
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Rectification of EMG in low force contractions improves detection of motor unit coherence in the beta-frequency band.

Authors:  Nicholas J Ward; Simon F Farmer; Luc Berthouze; David M Halliday
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Intermuscular coherence contributions in synergistic muscles during pedaling.

Authors:  Cristiano De Marchis; Giacomo Severini; Anna Margherita Castronovo; Maurizio Schmid; Silvia Conforto
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Neural coupling between homologous muscles during bimanual tasks: effects of visual and somatosensory feedback.

Authors:  Hoi B Nguyen; Sang Wook Lee; Michelle L Harris-Love; Peter S Lum
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Effect of training status on beta-range corticomuscular coherence in agonist vs. antagonist muscles during isometric knee contractions.

Authors:  Fabien Dal Maso; Marieke Longcamp; Sylvain Cremoux; David Amarantini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Dynamic Modulation of Beta Band Cortico-Muscular Coupling Induced by Audio-Visual Rhythms.

Authors:  Manuel Varlet; Sylvie Nozaradan; Laurel Trainor; Peter E Keller
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-08-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.