Literature DB >> 22119938

A CD44⁻/CD24⁺ phenotype is a poor prognostic marker in early invasive breast cancer.

Mohamed A H Ahmed1, Mohammed A Aleskandarany, Emad A Rakha, Radwa Z A Moustafa, Ahmed Benhasouna, Christopher Nolan, Andrew R Green, Mohammad Ilyas, Ian O Ellis.   

Abstract

A CD44(-)/CD24(+) phenotype is a poor prognostic marker in early invasive breast cancer. Breast cancer cells with high CD44 and low or absent CD24 (i.e. CD44(+)CD24(-)/low phenotype) are reported to have stem cell features. However, the clinical impact of CD24 and CD44 expression in tumours remains unclear. To explore the immunohistochemical expression of CD44 and CD24 (individually and combined) and their clinical value as prognostic and predictive markers. Immunohistochemical expression of CD24 and CD44 was studied in a large series of early primary invasive breast cancer tumours (n = 1036) prepared as a tissue microarray. Associations between the expression of each marker individually and in combination and clinico-pathological, molecular variables and patients' outcome were investigated. CD24 cytoplasmic expression was significantly associated with poor prognostic variables including high tumour grade, ER-, PR-, HER2(+), p53+ and triple negative (TN) phenotype; P < 0.05. However, CD24 expression was not significantly associated with patients' outcome. Conversely, CD44 expression was associated with favourable prognostic criteria including lower Nottingham prognostic index, ER+, HER2- and luminal phenotype; P < 0.05. Moreover, CD44 expression was found to be an independent predictor of good prognosis. In combination, the CD44(+)/CD24(-) phenotype was associated with the most favourable outcome (84 and 80% 10 year breast cancer survival [BCSS] and metastasis free survival [MFS], respectively). Contrasting this, the CD44(-)/CD24(+) phenotype was associated with the most dismal outcome (62 and 60% 10 years BCSS and MFS, respectively). CD24 and CD44 expression can individually yield prognostic data in breast cancer, but importantly, when both markers are considered; the CD44(+)/CD24(-) phenotype had the best prognosis, while the CD44(-)/CD24(+) phenotype had the worst prognosis. This shows that the relationship between basic cell biology and clinical behaviour is not always straightforward and warrants further investigations of the true clinical impact of breast cancer stem cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22119938     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1865-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  42 in total

1.  The prognostic significance of BMI1 expression in invasive breast cancer is dependent on its molecular subtypes.

Authors:  Maryam Althobiti; Abir A Muftah; Mohammed A Aleskandarany; Chitra Joseph; Michael S Toss; Andrew Green; Emad Rakha
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Raf-1 oncogenic signaling is linked to activation of mesenchymal to epithelial transition pathway in metastatic breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Alexey A Leontovich; Shuya Zhang; Cosima Quatraro; Ianko Iankov; Pier Francesco Veroux; Mario W Gambino; Amy Degnim; James McCubrey; James Ingle; Evanthia Galanis; Antonino B D'Assoro
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 5.650

3.  Aberrant immunostaining pattern of the CD24 glycoprotein in clinical samples and experimental models of pediatric medulloblastomas.

Authors:  Emma Sandén; Cecilia Dyberg; Cecilia Krona; Edward Visse; Helena Carén; Paul A Northcott; Marcel Kool; Nils Ståhl; Annette Persson; Elisabet Englund; John I Johnsen; Peter Siesjö; Anna Darabi
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 4.  Breast cancer stem cells-from origins to targeted therapy.

Authors:  Woei Chyi Sin; Chooi Ling Lim
Journal:  Stem Cell Investig       Date:  2017-11-29

5.  Evidence for embryonic stem-like signature and epithelial-mesenchymal transition features in the spheroid cells derived from lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Raheleh Roudi; Zahra Madjd; Marzieh Ebrahimi; Ali Najafi; Alireza Korourian; Ahmad Shariftabrizi; Ali Samadikuchaksaraei
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-04-05

6.  Engineered Breast Cancer Cell Spheroids Reproduce Biologic Properties of Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Stephanie L Ham; Ramila Joshi; Gary D Luker; Hossein Tavana
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 9.933

7.  Correlation of TERT and Stem Cell Markers in the Context of Human Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Umar Wazir; Mona M A W Orakzai; Tracey Amanda Martin; Wen G Jiang; Kefah Mokbel
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.069

8.  CD44 expression in intraoral salivary ductal papillomas and oral papillary squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Sarah G Fitzpatrick; Lindsay J Montague; Donald M Cohen; Indraneel Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2012-11-13

Review 9.  Role of hypoxia-inducible factors in breast cancer metastasis.

Authors:  Daniele M Gilkes; Gregg L Semenza
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.404

10.  Predictive value of CD44 and CD24 for prognosis and chemotherapy response in invasive breast ductal carcinoma.

Authors:  Yanping Chen; Jinlian Song; Yuhong Jiang; Chundong Yu; Zhongliang Ma
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.