Literature DB >> 22119855

Incidence rate and predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis.

Valeria Calvi1, Sergio Conti, Giusi Paola Pruiti, Davide Capodanno, Euglena Puzzangara, Donatella Tempio, Angelo Di Grazia, Gian Paolo Ussia, Corrado Tamburino.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conduction disorders and permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation are common complications in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Previous studies, evaluating small populations, have identified several different predictors of PPM implantation after TAVI. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence rate of conduction disorders and the predictors of postoperative PPM requirement in a large series of patients undergoing TAVI.
METHODS: Data were analyzed from 181 consecutive patients at high-risk surgery who underwent TAVI at our institute between July 2007 and April 2011. All patients underwent implantation of the third-generation percutaneous self-expanding CoreValve® prosthesis (CoreValve, Inc., Irvine, CA, USA). In all patients, a 12-lead electrocardiogram and a 24-h holter monitoring was recorded before and after the procedure in order to assess the presence of conduction disorders. Clinical data, preoperative conduction disorders, echocardiographic patterns, and procedural data were tested as predictors of PPM implantation after TAVI.
RESULTS: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) was the most common conduction disorder, with an incidence of 50.3% at discharge. Fifty-two (32.1%) patients developed a persistent complete AVB requiring PPM implantation. PPM implantation was strongly correlated with the presence of preoperative right bundle branch block (RBBB) which was found to be the only independent predictor of PPM implantation (HR 16.5, CI 3.3-82.3, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: LBBB and PPM implantation requirement after TAVI are common occurrences using the self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis. In this large series of consecutive patients, only RBBB was found to be a strong predictor of PPM requirement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22119855     DOI: 10.1007/s10840-011-9634-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  28 in total

1.  Transapical minimally invasive aortic valve implantation; the initial 50 patients.

Authors:  Thomas Walther; Volkmar Falk; Jörg Kempfert; Michael A Borger; Jens Fassl; Michael W A Chu; Gerhard Schuler; Friedrich W Mohr
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 2.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: A systematic review.

Authors:  Tristan D Yan; Christopher Cao; Julie Martens-Nielsen; Ratnasari Padang; Martin Ng; Michael P Vallely; Paul G Bannon
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Factors associated with cardiac conduction disorders and permanent pacemaker implantation after percutaneous aortic valve implantation with the CoreValve prosthesis.

Authors:  Jan Baan; Ze Yie Yong; Karel T Koch; José P S Henriques; Berto J Bouma; Marije M Vis; Riccardo Cocchieri; Jan J Piek; Bas A J M de Mol
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation in humans: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Samuel V Lichtenstein; Anson Cheung; Jian Ye; Christopher R Thompson; Ronald G Carere; Sanjeevan Pasupati; John G Webb
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-07-31       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: first results from a multi-centre real-world registry.

Authors:  Ralf Zahn; Ulrich Gerckens; Eberhard Grube; Axel Linke; Horst Sievert; Holger Eggebrecht; Rainer Hambrecht; Stefan Sack; Karl Eugen Hauptmann; Gert Richardt; Hans-Reiner Figulla; Jochen Senges
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Lesions of conduction tissue complicating aortic valvular replacement.

Authors:  T Fukuda; R L Hawley; J E Edwards
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Risk factors for pacemaker implantation following aortic valve replacement: a single centre experience.

Authors:  G Limongelli; V Ducceschi; A D'Andrea; A Renzulli; B Sarubbi; M De Feo; F Cerasuolo; R Calabrò; M Cotrufo
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Treatment of calcific aortic stenosis with the percutaneous heart valve: mid-term follow-up from the initial feasibility studies: the French experience.

Authors:  Alain Cribier; Helene Eltchaninoff; Christophe Tron; Fabrice Bauer; Carla Agatiello; Deborah Nercolini; Sydney Tapiero; Pierre-Yves Litzler; Jean-Paul Bessou; Vasilis Babaliaros
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Prognostic significance of the development of left bundle conduction defects following aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  J L Thomas; R A Dickstein; F B Parker; J L Potts; R A Poirier; C T Fruehan; R H Eich
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Procedural success and 30-day clinical outcomes after percutaneous aortic valve replacement using current third-generation self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis.

Authors:  Corrado Tamburino; Davide Capodanno; Massimiliano Mulè; Marilena Scarabelli; Valeria Cammalleri; Marco Barbanti; Antonio Calafiore; Gianpaolo Ussia
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.022

View more
  8 in total

1.  Permanent Pacemaker Implantation after TAVR - Predictors and Impact on Outcomes.

Authors:  Marcel Weber; Jan-Malte Sinning; Christoph Hammerstingl; Nikos Werner; Eberhard Grube; Georg Nickenig
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2015-05

Review 2.  Permanent pacemaker insertion in patients with conduction abnormalities post transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a review and proposed guidelines.

Authors:  Tamunoinemi Bob-Manuel; Amit Nanda; Samuel Latham; Issa Pour-Ghaz; William Paul Skelton; Rami N Khouzam
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-01

3.  Management of Coronary Artery Disease and Conduction Abnormalities in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Authors:  Anna Kostopoulou; Panagiotis Karyofillis; Efthimios Livanis; George Karavolias; George Theodorakis; John Paraskevaides; Vassilis Voudris
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-02

Review 4.  Multimodality noninvasive imaging for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a primer.

Authors:  Stephen H Little; Dipan J Shah; John J Mahmarian
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun

Review 5.  New conduction abnormalities after TAVI--frequency and causes.

Authors:  Robert M van der Boon; Rutger-Jan Nuis; Nicolas M Van Mieghem; Luc Jordaens; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Ron T van Domburg; Patrick W Serruys; Robert H Anderson; Peter P T de Jaegere
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  Computed Tomography for Structural Heart Disease and Interventions.

Authors:  Pascal Thériault-Lauzier; Marco Spaziano; Beatriz Vaquerizo; Jean Buithieu; Giuseppe Martucci; Nicolo Piazza
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2015-09

Review 7.  Atrioventricular and intraventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Jane J Lee; Nora Goldschlager; Vaikom S Mahadevan
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-06-24       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 8.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: design, clinical application, and future challenges.

Authors:  John K Forrest
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2012-06-25
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.