Literature DB >> 22117733

The past, present and future of augmentation cystoplasty.

Suzanne M Biers1, Suzie N Venn, Tamsin J Greenwell.   

Abstract

What's known on the subject? And what does the study add? There is a wealth of evidence on the development, indications, outcomes and complications of augmentation cystoplasty (AC). Over the last decade, new evidence has been emerging to influence our clinical practice and application of this technique. AC is indicated as part of the treatment pathway for both neurogenic and idiopathic detrusor overactivity, usually where other interventions have failed or are inappropriate. The most commonly used technique remains augmentation with a detubularised patch of ileum (ileocystoplasty). Controversy persists over the role of routine surveillance following ileocystoplasty for the detection of subsequent bladder carcinoma; however the indication for surveillance after gastrocystoplasty is clearer due to a rising incidence of malignancy in this group. Despite a reduction in the overall numbers of AC operations being performed, it clearly still has a role to play, which we re-examine with contemporary studies from the last decade.
© 2011 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2011 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22117733     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10650.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  50 in total

Review 1.  The role of imaging in pediatric bladder augmentation.

Authors:  Micheál Breen; Andrew Phelps; Carlos Estrada; Jeanne S Chow
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-04-24

Review 2.  Minimally Invasive Techniques for Bladder Reconstruction.

Authors:  Tony Nimeh; Sean Elliott
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Indications for Augmentation Cystoplasty in the Era of OnabotulinumtoxinA.

Authors:  Evan Shreck; Kevin Gioia; Alvaro Lucioni
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Cumulative incidence of outcomes and urologic procedures after augmentation cystoplasty.

Authors:  Bruce J Schlomer; Hillary L Copp
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 1.830

5.  Bladder augmentation and urinary diversion for neurogenic LUTS: current indications.

Authors:  Kamran P Sajadi; Howard B Goldman
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  The treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  A Tubaro; F Puccini; C De Nunzio; G A Digesu; S Elneil; C Gobbi; V Khullar
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 7.  Treatment for refractory overactive bladder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of sacral neuromodulation and onabotulinumtoxinA.

Authors:  Qing He; Boya Li; Chi Zhang; Jie Zhang; Deyi Luo; Kunjie Wang
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Midterm outcomes of protection for upper urinary tract function by augmentation enterocystoplasty in patients with neurogenic bladder.

Authors:  Limin Liao; Fan Zhang; Guoqing Chen
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Should simultaneous ureteral reimplantation be performed during sigmoid bladder augmentation to reduce vesicoureteral reflux in neurogenic bladder cases?

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Yong Yang; Zhi-jin Wu; Ning Zhang; Chao-hua Zhang; Xiao-dong Zhang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Tissue-engineered tubular substitutions for urinary diversion in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Lingchao Meng; Wenbiao Liao; Sixing Yang; Yunhe Xiong; Chao Song; Lingqi Liu
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2015-08-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.