Literature DB >> 22116011

Development and preliminary results of the Financial Incentive Coercion Assessment questionnaire.

Margaret M Byrne1, Jason R Croft, Michael T French, Karen L Dugosh, David S Festinger.   

Abstract

Financial incentives are often used in research, yet no measure exists to determine whether they lead to perceptions of coercion in subjects. We present a preliminary evaluation of a recently developed Financial Incentive Coercion Assessment (FICA) questionnaire. FICA measures perceived coercion specifically related to payment for participation in a research study. Two hundred sixty-six subjects were recruited from a large randomized controlled trial; 152 returned for a 6-month follow-up and completed the FICA. Approximately 30% of participants reported the major reason for participating was "for the money," but less than 5% felt that the financial incentives were coercive. FICA results are consistent with levels of perceived coercion using an alternative measure. Initial assessment of responses on the FICA suggests that it may provide a novel approach to measuring perceived coercion from financial incentives in research. Future work will refine the FICA and analyze its psychometric properties.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22116011      PMCID: PMC3701294          DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2011.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat        ISSN: 0740-5472


  30 in total

Review 1.  Enhancing adherence in clinical research.

Authors:  William N Robiner
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Do research payments precipitate drug use or coerce participation?

Authors:  David S Festinger; Douglas B Marlowe; Jason R Croft; Karen L Dugosh; Nicole K Mastro; Patricia A Lee; David S Dematteo; Nicholas S Patapis
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2005-01-23       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Payments to research subjects.

Authors:  Martin Wilkinson
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2005-01

4.  A randomized controlled trial of financial incentives for smoking cessation.

Authors:  Kevin G Volpp; Andrea Gurmankin Levy; David A Asch; Jesse A Berlin; John J Murphy; Angela Gomez; Harold Sox; Jingsan Zhu; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Incentives for survey participation when are they "coercive"?

Authors:  Eleanor Singer; Robert M Bossarte
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 6.  Competitions and incentives for smoking cessation.

Authors:  Kate Cahill; Rafael Perera
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-04-13

7.  Long-term benefits of adding incentives to the community reinforcement approach for cocaine dependence.

Authors:  Gloria García-Fernández; Roberto Secades-Villa; Olaya García-Rodríguez; Helí Alvarez-López; José R Fernández-Hermida; Sergio Fernández-Artamendi; Stephen T Higgins
Journal:  Eur Addict Res       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 8.  Pharmacoeconomic consequences of variable patient compliance with prescribed drug regimens.

Authors:  J Urquhart
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Maximising retention in a longitudinal study of genital Chlamydia trachomatis among young women in Australia.

Authors:  Jennifer Walker; Christopher K Fairley; Eve Urban; Marcus Y Chen; Catriona Bradshaw; Sandra M Walker; Basil Donovan; Sepehr N Tabrizi; Kathleen McNamee; Marian Currie; Marie Pirotta; John Kaldor; Lyle C Gurrin; Hudson Birden; Veerakathy Harindra; Francis J Bowden; Suzanne Garland; Jane M Gunn; Jane S Hocking
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 10.  Increasing recruitment to randomised trials: a review of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Judith M Watson; David J Torgerson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2006-07-19       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.