| Literature DB >> 22114559 |
Manimala Sen1, Bhavin Shah, Srabanti Rakshit, Vijender Singh, Bhavna Padmanabhan, Manikandan Ponnusamy, Koteppa Pari, Ram Vishwakarma, Dipankar Nandi, Parag P Sadhale.
Abstract
Candida albicans, aEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22114559 PMCID: PMC3219719 DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002384
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Pathog ISSN: 1553-7366 Impact factor: 6.823
Figure 1Putative Gal10 paralog does not encode functional Galactose epimerase.
A) Multiple sequence alignment of Gal10 homologs from E. coli (Ec), N. crassa (Nc), H. jecorina (Hj), S. cerevisiae (Sc), C. albicans (Ca), D. hansenii (Dh), H. sapiens (Hs). The residues known to play a crucial role in catalysis or in NAD binding are shown in boxes. Identical residues are marked as * and similar residues are marked as ‘:’ B) S. cerevisiae gal10 deletion strain transformed with pPS189 (empty vector) or, pMS643 (P-Gal102), pMS861 (P-Gal102*) were spotted on YPD and YPGal plates and incubated at 30°C. Plates were photographed next day. WT S. cerevisiae strain BY4741 (GAL10) was spotted as control. C) WT SC5314 (GAL102/GAL102), Cagal10Δ/Δ and gal102Δ/Δ cells were spotted on YPD and YPGal plates and checked for growth after 1 day.
Figure 2GAL102 encodes a dTDP-glucose 4, 6-dehydratase.
A) The sequence alignment of fungal homologs of dTDP-glucose 4, 6-dehydratase with Gal102 was generated using ClustalW. The homologs from E. coli and A. thaliana used for the multiple sequence alignments are shown. The conserved NAD binding motif and the active site YXXXK motif are boxed. B) Enzymatic activity of purified wildtype Gal102 (WT) and the catalytic mutant K159A (MT) was tested with UDP glucose, dTDP glucose as substrates. The activity was measured as NAD-NADH conversion by monitoring increase in A340. All the substrates and cofactor NAD were used at 3 mM concentration. The reactions were carried out at 37°C for 2 hr. Experiment was done in triplicate with 20 µg of recombinant protein expressed in E. coli and purified using Ni-NTA column per reaction. *p<0.05.
Figure 3Deletion of GAL102 affects cell morphology and cell wall integrity.
A) Cells of GAL102/GAL102, gal102Δ/Δ, WT reintegrant and the K159A mutant reintegrant in gal102Δ/Δ strain were grown overnight at 30°C in YPD supplemented with uridine or Lee's or Spider medium. Cells were photographed using Olympus BX51 microscope with Nomarsky optics at 400X magnification. B) The gal102Δ/Δ and the GAL102/GAL102 strain were incubated in YPD containing the indicated cell wall damaging agents at the indicated concentrations. C) The gal102Δ/Δ and the WT DAY286 strain were mixed with top agar and poured on top of YPD plates. Various concentration of Echinocandin (5–15 µg) was added to the wells and photographs were taken after 48 hr of incubation at 37°C. The results from 3 different plates were used to measure the diameter of zone of inhibition and plotted in the bar graph (lower panel). Grey bars represent WT while the black bars represent mutant. *p<0.05.
Figure 4Deletion of the GAL102 affects cell wall mannan composition.
A) Anomeric region of 1H-NMR spectra of mannans from the WT (i) and gal102Δ/Δ (ii) of C. albicans recorded at 40°C temperature on a 500 MHz NMR spectrometer equipped with a triple resonance probe. Important changes that appear in the spectra for WT and the mutant samples are highlighted (and peaks are labeled with numbers). B) 2D 1H-1H TOCSY spectra of mannans from the WT (i) and the gal102Δ/Δ (ii) recorded on a 500 MHz NMR spectrometer equipped with a triple resonance probe. The mixing time for the TOCSY was fixed at 100 ms. The data was acquired at 40°C. Highlighted contours with red colors indicate the peaks of interest for comparison. C) Anomeric region of the 2D 1H-13C HSQC spectra of mannans from the WT (i) and gal102Δ/Δ (ii) recorded at 40°C on a 500 MHz NMR spectrometer equipped with a triple resonance probe. The panels (iii) and (iv) show 2D 1H-13C HSQC spectra of the WT and gal102Δ/Δ strain in the C-2, C-3 and C-6 proton/carbon region of the spectra. Highlighted contours with red box indicate the appearance of the new peaks in the spectra for mutant sample.
Figure 5The mutant mannan composition is significantly different from that of the WT and is qualitatively distinct from the other known mannosylation mutants.
Top panel represents the mannan profile of WT (SC5314) strain, based on Netea et al. [22] illustration. Bottom panel, represents the mannan profile of gal102Δ/Δ. Effects of other known mannosylation mutants on the mannan structure is also as represented by Netea et al. [22]. These are indicated to allow comparison with gal102 mutant. The various linkages between the mannosyl residues have been indicated by the shading of the residues. The legend for the link and the shade intensity is given at the bottom of the figure. The boxes highlight the most significant differences in the mannan profile between the WT and the mutant linkages that are either reduced or absent (denoted by empty circles) in the mutant.
The list of representative genes differentially expressed in C. albicans gal102Δ/Δ as compared to the WT.
| Classification | Percentage | Representative genes |
| Down regulated | ||
| Biofilm associated | 6 |
|
| Virulence | 12 |
|
| Cell wall associated | 11 |
|
| Macrophage associated | 8 |
|
| Misc. | 63 | iron proteins, metabolism involved genes, membrane proteins putative transcription factors chromatin associated genes |
| Up regulated | ||
| Oligopeptide and ion transporters | 10 |
|
| Stress associated | 11 |
|
| Cell wall and GPI anchored proteins | 18 |
|
| Misc | 61 |
|
The genes are categorized based on available annotation in the Candida genome database.
Figure 6Macrophages suppress the growth of gal102Δ/Δ in vitro.
A) Live C. albicans (WT or gal102Δ/Δ) were cultured in the absence or presence of adherent resident peritoneal macrophages for different time periods. Following incubation, C. albicans were washed and plated onto YPD agar plates. Data are pooled from at least two separate experiments with a total of three experiments (mean ± SD), *p < 0.05, t test. B) Representative micrographs depicting growth of WT and gal102Δ/Δ strains of Candida in the absence (left panel) or presence (right panel) of resident peritoneal macrophages for 18 hr is shown.
Figure 7Biofilm structure and diffusion properties are seriously compromised in C. albicans lacking GAL102.
The biofilms of WT (SC5314), gal102Δ/Δ, and WT and the K159A mutant reintegrant in gal102Δ/Δ strain were allowed to be developed as described in the Materials and Methods section. The biofilms were observed under a scanning electron microscope after appropriate treatment. Representative pictures at 1500X magnification are shown.
Figure 8Infection of mice with gal102Δ/Δ leads to enhanced survival and reduced fungal tissue burden.
Mice were infected intravenously with 5×106 cells of WT (SC5314 and DAY286), gal102Δ/Δ, and the GAL102 or the gal102 mutant reintegrants in gal102Δ/Δ strain. Mice were sacrificed at 24, 42 and 60 hr after infection and disease progression was assessed. A) The survival curve and statistical differences between strains were analyzed by Prism software using the Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. Data from one experiment using five mice is shown and is representative of three identical, separate experiments. **p < 0.01, t test. (B and C) Subgroups of three to five mice were sacrificed at 24, 42 and 60 hr after infection Quantitative fungal burden in kidney and liver was measured by serial dilution and expressed as log CFU/gram tissue. Data are represented as mean ± standard errors of the means from three separate experiments with three to five mice per strain. ***p<0.0001, ## p<0.01 and $$ p<0.01 compared with SC5314, DAY286 and WTRI (for (gal102Δ/Δ) injected mice) in kidney at 42 and 60 hr. ***p<0.0001, ### p<0.0001 and $$$p<0.0001 compared with SC5314, DAY286 and WTRI (for (gal102Δ/Δ) injected mice) in liver at 24, 42 and 60 hr. (D and E) Kidney and liver tissue sections were dissected from mice sacrificed at 60 hr, stained with hematoxylin & eosin and histological changes were observed. Sections from PBS treated mice were used as control. A representative histopathological examination is shown (magnification 400X for both panels). Black arrows indicate inflammatory cells, NA denotes necrotic areas in liver and white arrows indicate tubular casts and double headed arrows indicate sloughing of the tubular epithelial cells in the kidney.
Figure 9Reduced virulence is associated with the inability of gal102Δ/Δ to elicit pro-inflammatory cytokine response in the host.
(A, B and C) Mice were infected intravenously with WT (SC5314 and DAY286), gal102Δ/Δ, and the GAL102 or the gal102 mutant reintegrants in gal102Δ/Δ strains and were sacrificed at different time points for measurement of serum cytokine amounts. TNFα (A), IFNγ(B) and IL-4 (C) amounts were determined by ELISA. Sera from PBS treated mice were taken as control. Data are represented as means ± standard errors of the means from three separate experiments with sera of five mice. ***p<0.001, **p<0.01, *p<0.05; ### p<0.001, ## p<0.01, # p<0.05 and $$$ p<0.001, $$ p<0.01, $ p<0.05 compared with SC5314, DAY286 and WTRI (for (gal102Δ/Δ) treated).
List of C. albicans and S. cerevisiae strains.
| Strain | Genotype | Reference |
|
| ||
| SC5314 | Clinical isolate |
|
| BWP17 |
|
|
| DAY286 |
| |
| CAS8 | BWP17, |
|
| CAS12 | BWP17, | This study |
| CAS17 | BWP17, | This study |
| CAS18 | BWP17, | This study |
|
| ||
| PJB5 |
|
|
List of plasmids.
| Plasmid | Alias | Description | Reference |
| pVM602 |
| This study | |
| pPS189 | pABE448 | Yeast cloning vector, PTEF1, |
|
| pMS643 |
| This study | |
| pMS835 | Codon optimized | This study | |
| pMS836 | Codon optimized | This study | |
| pMS837 | Codon optimised catalytic mutant of | This study | |
| pMS838 | Codon optimised catalytic mutant of | This study | |
| pMS861 | Codon optimized | This study | |
| pMS889 | 420 bp downstream region of | This study | |
| pMS890 | 420 bp downstream region of | This study | |
| pMS891 | Wildtype Ca | This study | |
| pMS892 | Catalytic mutant of Ca | This study |
List of primers.
| Primer | Primer sequence |
| CaACT1(f) | 5′CGTTGTTCCAATTTACGCTGG 3′ |
| CaACT1(r) | 5′CAGCAATACCTGGGAACATGG 3′ |
| Ca putGal10 (r) | 5′CAGTTCATGGCAAGGGAACC 3′ |
| Ca put Gal10 int (f) | 5′CAGTTCATGGCAAGGGAACC 3′ |
| Ca put Gal10 _del _F | 5′CTAAACTATGCTAGTAATGCTACTGAAATCGAAAATCTTAAGAGTTTCTCAAACTTTGAATTTGTTCACTTGGATTTATCAGAGAAGCTTCGTACGCTGCAGGTC 3′ |
| Ca put Gal10_del _R | 5′CCTTAACAAGAGATATTTTCGGAGACCATCCCAAATTATGGATCTTTTGTTGTGTCTATGGAATAATTAGTATCGTTGTAATTTCGATCTTTGATAAATTTCTGATATCATCGATGAATTGAG 3′ |
| Gal102 CTG* r | 5′ |
| Psfs2_f | 5′GTCGAGCGTCAAAACTAGAG 3′ |
| Psfs2_r | 5′ |
| Gal102 _int _r | 5′AATCAATAGCTGC |
| Gal102 _int _f | 5′CAAGT |
| Ca putGal10 (f) | 5′ |