Literature DB >> 22113862

Current status of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

Jose M Reyes1, Marc C Smaldone, Robert G Uzzo, Rosalia Viterbo.   

Abstract

The incidence of incidentally diagnosed small renal masses is rising. Although open partial nephrectomy (OPN) remains the reference standard for clinically localized renal lesions, growing experience with minimally invasive PN has demonstrated equivalent oncologic efficacy and improved short-term perioperative outcomes compared to open techniques. Compared to the technically demanding laparoscopic PN (LPN), robotic PN (RPN) overcomes a number of the technical hurdles of LPN with a shorter learning curve, and now has emerged as an attractive minimally invasive treatment option for amenable tumors. Although experience with RPN has been limited to date, early series have demonstrated short-term oncologic outcomes comparable to OPN and equivalent perioperative outcomes to LPN (all ≤ level III evidence). Although prospective evidence would be ideal, clinical trial comparisons with LPN and OPN will be fraught with accrual challenges and are not expected in the near future. This review summarizes the advantages and indications for a robotic approach, operative principles and emerging technologies, early functional and oncologic outcomes, and expected future advances of RPN for localized renal tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22113862     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-011-0223-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   3.092


  87 in total

1.  Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: single-surgeon matched cohort study of 150 patients.

Authors:  Georges-Pascal Haber; Wesley M White; Sebastien Crouzet; Michael A White; Sylvain Forest; Riccardo Autorino; Jihad H Kaouk
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Robotic partial nephrectomy: new beginnings.

Authors:  Ricardo Brandina; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 3.  Comparison of laparoscopic versus robotic assisted partial nephrectomy: one surgeon's initial experience.

Authors:  Jessica M DeLong; Oleg Shapiro; Alireza Moinzadeh
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.344

4.  Rising incidence of small renal masses: a need to reassess treatment effect.

Authors:  John M Hollingsworth; David C Miller; Stephanie Daignault; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system.

Authors:  Matthew T Gettman; Michael L Blute; George K Chow; Richard Neururer; Georg Bartsch; Reinhard Peschel
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Every minute counts when the renal hilum is clamped during partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  R Houston Thompson; Brian R Lane; Christine M Lohse; Bradley C Leibovich; Amr Fergany; Igor Frank; Inderbir S Gill; Michael L Blute; Steven C Campbell
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Robotic partial nephrectomy with sliding-clip renorrhaphy: technique and outcomes.

Authors:  Brian M Benway; Agnes J Wang; Jose M Cabello; Sam B Bhayani
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: evaluation of learning curve for an experienced renal surgeon.

Authors:  Mohammed Haseebuddin; Brian M Benway; Jose M Cabello; Sam B Bhayani
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a large single-institutional experience.

Authors:  Benjamin J Scoll; Robert G Uzzo; David Y T Chen; Stephen A Boorjian; Alexander Kutikov; Brandon J Manley; Rosalia Viterbo
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy in patients with small renal tumors--is there a difference in mortality and cardiovascular outcomes?

Authors:  William C Huang; Elena B Elkin; Andrew S Levey; Thomas L Jang; Paul Russo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The role of minimally invasive surgery in multifocal renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Serge Ginzburg; Robert G Uzzo; Alexander Kutikov
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Mental stress experienced by first-year residents and expert surgeons with robotic and laparoscopic surgery interfaces.

Authors:  Martina I Klein; Vladimir Mouraviev; Curtis Craig; Lou Salamone; Timothy A Plerhoples; Sherry M Wren; Krishnanath Gaitonde
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2014-01-23

3.  [Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: functional and oncological outcomes].

Authors:  F C Roos; C Thomas; A Neisius; S Nestler; J W Thüroff; C Hampel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Robot-assisted renal surgery: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Manuela Hiess; Christian Seitz
Journal:  Robot Surg       Date:  2016-05-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.