Literature DB >> 22112970

Serial FDG-PET/CT for early outcome prediction in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer undergoing chemotherapy.

A Hendlisz1, V Golfinopoulos, C Garcia, A Covas, P Emonts, L Ameye, M Paesmans, A Deleporte, G Machiels, E Toussaint, B Vanderlinden, A Awada, M Piccart, P Flamen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The study purpose was to assess the predictive value of 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computerized tomography (CT) metabolic response after a single course of chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: FDG-PET/CT scans were carried out at baseline and on day 14 in 41 patients with unresectable mCRC treated with a biweekly regimen of chemotherapy. Metabolic nonresponse was defined by <15% decrease in FDG uptake in the dominant proportion of the patient's lesions or if a lesion was found metabolically progressive. The PET-based response was correlated with radiological response (primary end point) and patient's outcome (secondary end points).
RESULTS: RECIST response rate in metabolically responding patients was 43% (10 of 23) compared with 0% (0 of 17) in nonresponding patients (P=0.002). The metabolic assessment's predictive performance for RECIST response was sensitivity 100% [95% confidence interval (CI) 69% to 100%], specificity 57% (95% CI 37% to 75%), positive predictive value 43% (95% CI 23% to 66%), and negative predictive value 100% (95% CI 80% to 100%). Comparing metabolically responding versus nonresponding patients, the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.28 (95% CI 0.10-0.76) for overall survival and 0.57 (95% CI 0.27-1.21) for progression-free survival.
CONCLUSION: The metabolic response measured by FDG-PET/CT after a single course of chemotherapy in mCRC is able to identify patients who will not benefit from the treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22112970     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdr554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  31 in total

Review 1.  The surgical treatment of patients with colorectal cancer and liver metastases in the setting of the "liver first" approach.

Authors:  Leonardo Patrlj; Mario Kopljar; Robert Kliček; Masa Hrelec Patrlj; Marijan Kolovrat; Mislav Rakić; Antonija Duzel
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.293

2.  Positron emission tomography/computed tomography and biomarkers for early treatment response evaluation in metastatic colon cancer.

Authors:  Bodil E Engelmann; Annika Loft; Andreas Kjær; Hans J Nielsen; Thomas A Gerds; Eric V Benzon; Nils Brünner; Ib J Christensen; Susanne H Hansson; Niels H Holländer; Michael H Kristensen; Johan Löfgren; Elena Markova; Carsten Sloth; Liselotte Højgaard
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-01-22

Review 3.  Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology.

Authors:  Andrea Gallamini; Colette Zwarthoed; Anna Borra
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  [Importance of PET/CT for imaging of colorectal cancer].

Authors:  F G Meinel; N Schramm; A R Haug; A Graser; M F Reiser; C Rist
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Multidisciplinary management of liver metastases in patients with colorectal cancer: a consensus of SEOM, AEC, SEOR, SERVEI, and SEMNIM.

Authors:  R Vera; E González-Flores; C Rubio; J Urbano; M Valero Camps; J J Ciampi-Dopazo; J Orcajo Rincón; V Morillo Macías; M A Gomez Braco; G Suarez-Artacho
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Selection for hepatic resection of colorectal liver metastases: expert consensus statement.

Authors:  Reid B Adams; Thomas A Aloia; Evelyne Loyer; Timothy M Pawlik; Bachir Taouli; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Comparison of PET metabolic indices for the early assessment of tumour response in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated by polychemotherapy.

Authors:  Jacques-Antoine Maisonobe; Camilo A Garcia; Hatem Necib; Bruno Vanderlinden; Alain Hendlisz; Patrick Flamen; Irène Buvat
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Evaluation of cancer treatment in the abdomen: Trends and advances.

Authors:  Silanath Peungjesada; Hubert H Chuang; Srinivasa R Prasad; Haesun Choi; Evelyne M Loyer; Yulia Bronstein
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2013-03-28

9.  The oncosurgery approach to managing liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a multidisciplinary international consensus.

Authors:  René Adam; Aimery De Gramont; Joan Figueras; Ashley Guthrie; Norihiro Kokudo; Francis Kunstlinger; Evelyne Loyer; Graeme Poston; Philippe Rougier; Laura Rubbia-Brandt; Alberto Sobrero; Josep Tabernero; Catherine Teh; Eric Van Cutsem
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-09-07

Review 10.  Missing metastases as a model to challenge current therapeutic algorithms in colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Valerio Lucidi; Alain Hendlisz; Jean-Luc Van Laethem; Vincent Donckier
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.