Literature DB >> 22112320

No difference in the frequency of locus-specific methylation in the peripheral blood DNA of women diagnosed with breast cancer and age-matched controls.

Tomasz K Wojdacz1, Britta B Thestrup, Søren Cold, Jens Overgaard, Lise L Hansen.   

Abstract

There is no doubt that aberrant somatic (tumor-specific) methylation significantly contributes to the carcinogenic process. However, the question of the relevance of methylation pattern changes, acquired by individuals during their development and lifetime or inherited through the germline, to the pathology of different diseases, remains open. Recently, a number of studies addressed the question of the prevalence of aberrant methylation of cancer-related genes in peripheral blood leukocyte (PBL) DNA and indicated a strong possibility that the presence of constitutional methylation of different genes might predispose for cancer development. Here, we have used the methlyation-sensitive high-resolution melting approach to examine the methylation status of the BRCA1, BRCA2, APC, RASSF1A and RARβ2 genes in PBLs of a group of women diagnosed with breast cancer, and an age-matched control group with no signs of breast cancer. No significant differences in the frequency of methylation of the above genes were found between cases and controls in our study. Hence, testing for the presence of methylation of cancer-related genes in PBL DNA from women diagnosed with sporadic breast cancer and classified for testing without any pathological or clinical selection criteria does not seem to have clinical applicability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22112320     DOI: 10.2217/fon.11.123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Future Oncol        ISSN: 1479-6694            Impact factor:   3.404


  8 in total

Review 1.  Constitutional epimutation as a mechanism for cancer causality and heritability?

Authors:  Megan P Hitchins
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Methylation of cancer related genes in tumor and peripheral blood DNA from the same breast cancer patient as two independent events.

Authors:  Tomasz K Wojdacz; Britta B Thestrup; Jens Overgaard; Lise Lotte Hansen
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.644

3.  The limitations of locus specific methylation qualification and quantification in clinical material.

Authors:  Tomasz K Wojdacz
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Association between aberrant APC promoter methylation and breast cancer pathogenesis: a meta-analysis of 35 observational studies.

Authors:  Dan Zhou; Weiwei Tang; Wenyi Wang; Xiaoyan Pan; Han-Xiang An; Yun Zhang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  APC gene promoter aberrant methylation in serum as a biomarker for breast cancer diagnosis: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaojun Qian; Liwei Ruan
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Promoter Hypermethylation in White Blood Cell DNA and Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Yoon Hee Cho; Lauren E McCullough; Marilie D Gammon; Hui-Chen Wu; Yu-Jing Zhang; Qiao Wang; Xinran Xu; Susan L Teitelbaum; Alfred I Neugut; Jia Chen; Regina M Santella
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.207

7.  Quantitative assessment of the association between APC promoter methylation and breast cancer.

Authors:  Keli He; Li Zhang; Xinghua Long
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-06-21

Review 8.  Integrating DNA methylation measures to improve clinical risk assessment: are we there yet? The case of BRCA1 methylation marks to improve clinical risk assessment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Ee Ming Wong; Melissa C Southey; Mary Beth Terry
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.