Literature DB >> 22111089

Safe discharge of patients with low-risk upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB): can the use of Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score be extended?

I R Le Jeune1, A L Gordon, D Farrugia, R Manwani, I N Guha, M W James.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Risk stratification of patients with suspected upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) using either Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score (GBS) or preendoscopy Rockall score to facilitate early safe discharge (GBS=0, pre-Rockall=0) has been reported. This observational study compared score utility and considered the impact of extending the range of GBS or pre-Rockall scores permitting safe discharge.
METHODS: Consecutive adult patients presenting to acute medical admissions or the emergency department from September 2008-March 2009 with suspected UGIB had clinical history, vital signs, laboratory and endoscopy results prospectively recorded using electronic databases. GBS, pre-Rockall scores and a composite endpoint (blood transfusion, endoscopic therapy, interventional radiology, surgery or 30-day mortality) were calculated.
RESULTS: 388 patients with suspected UGIB were identified of which 92.3% were admitted (median (range) GBS=5 (0-19) and pre-Rockall=2 (0-11)) and 7.7% discharged (GBS=0 (0-4) and pre-Rockall=0 (0-4)). 186 (47.9%) underwent in-patient endoscopy. 151 (38.9%) were found to have the composite endpoint with 77.5% having transfusion, 45.7% endoscopic treatment and an 8.0% mortality within 30 days. AUROC (95% CI) for 30-day composite endpoint was 0.92 (0.89-0.94) using GBS and 0.75 (0.70-0.80) using pre-Rockall scores. Analysis using different GBS thresholds demonstrated that GBS=0, GBS ≤1 and GBS≤2 had superior utility in identifying freedom from an adverse clinical outcome at 30-days than pre-Rockall score 0.
CONCLUSIONS: GBS is superior to pre-Rockall score in identifying patients with suspected UGIB who have a low likelihood of an adverse clinical outcome and can be considered for early discharge. Diagnostic performance at different thresholds suggests that patients with GBS≤2 could be considered for early discharge, doubling the number of eligible patients (15.2 to 32.5%). This has important patient safety and resource implications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22111089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acute Med        ISSN: 1747-4884


  13 in total

1.  Glasgow Blatchford Score and risk stratifications in acute upper gastrointestinal bleed: can we extend this to 2 for urgent outpatient management?

Authors:  Kelly Chatten; Huw Purssell; Ashwini Kumar Banerjee; Stephanie Soteriadou; Yeng Ang
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.659

Review 2.  Upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk scores: Who, when and why?

Authors:  Sara Monteiro; Tiago Cúrdia Gonçalves; Joana Magalhães; José Cotter
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2016-02-15

3.  One fifth of hospitalizations for peptic ulcer-related bleeding are potentially preventable.

Authors:  Ray Boyapati; Sim Ye Ong; Bei Ye; Anuk Kruavit; Nora Lee; Rhys Vaughan; Sanjay Nandurkar; Peter Gibson; Mayur Garg
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Update on risk scoring systems for patients with upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

Authors:  Adrian J Stanley
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Outcomes of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Hospitalized Patients With Generalized Anxiety Disorder.

Authors:  Alexander J Kaye; Brooke Baker; Sarah Meyers; Sushil Ahlawat
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-16

6.  Pillcam ESO(®) is more accurate than clinical scoring systems in risk stratifying emergency room patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Ellen Gutkin; Albert Shalomov; Syed A Hussain; Sang H Kim; Rafael Cortes; Sondra Gray; Hani Judeh; Simcha Pollack; Moshe Rubin
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.409

7.  Use of glasgow-blatchford bleeding score reduces hospital stay duration and costs for patients with low-risk upper GI bleeding.

Authors:  Marc Girardin; David Bertolini; Saskia Ditisheim; Jean-Louis Frossard; Emiliano Giostra; Nicolas Goossens; Isabelle Morard; Thai Nguyen-Tang; Laurent Spahr; Alain Vonlaufen; Antoine Hadengue; Jean-Marc Dumonceau
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2014-05-07

8.  Clinical Application of AIMS65 Scores to Predict Outcomes in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Ragesh Babu Thandassery; Manik Sharma; Anil K John; Khalid Mohsin Al-Ejji; Hamidulla Wani; Khaleel Sultan; Muneera Al-Mohannadi; Rafie Yakoob; Moutaz Derbala; Nazeeh Al-Dweik; Muhammed Tariq Butt; Saad Rashid Al-Kaabi
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2015-09-30

9.  Blatchford Score Is Superior to AIMS65 Score in Predicting the Need for Clinical Interventions in Elderly Patients with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleed.

Authors:  Khalid Abusaada; Fnu Asad-Ur-Rahman; Vladimir Pech; Umair Majeed; Shengchuan Dai; Xiang Zhu; Sally A Litherland
Journal:  Adv Med       Date:  2016-08-28

10.  Glasgow Blatchford Score of limited benefit for low-risk urban patients: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  David A Leiman; Angela M Mills; Frances S Shofer; Andrew T Weber; Erin R Leiman; Brian P Riff; James D Lewis; Shivan J Mehta
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-09-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.